Guest guest Posted April 30, 2005 Report Share Posted April 30, 2005 Dear Abhay, As per rule Rahu is representing Jupiter, and as Jupiter is retro not to be considered so Rahu can not be taken as RPs. But, in my own experience I have seen that a retro planet should not be discarded but should be considered as RPs. Particularly if in the native's chart you are working same planet[say Jupiter in your example] is retro. I know this is very controversial but I have given my experience only. Moreover, RPs are used for timings of events. Then, retro rule of KP for discarding retro may be applicable. But if RPs are used for getting clue to some problems, then retro planet will give you sufficient clues. Inder , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2005 Report Share Posted April 30, 2005 Dear Inder Thanks for the reply. Yes, i have in mind your point that if any planet is Retro. & if the same planet is retro. in original chart also, then, it should be considered in RP. We need to observe this in many cases, then, we can definitely be sure about it. This rule might be true, but, see my exam. given below. Take my chart as an example, I have Jup. (retro) in my original chart, 2 days before i plotted a "Prashna Chart" which was of Pisces ascendant sign, wherein Reto. Jup was at 1st level in RP + Jup. was indicating favorable answer to my question. BUt, actually, the incidence has not happened, because i think, the Retro. planet always give negative answer (NO) only. Reto. Jup. has not given Positive result to my question even when it was signifying all the house required for the positive answer. So, think, the answer of Retro. planet is always "NO", irrespective of the original chart. Of course, we will need to observe more cases, but, this example was recent, so, i remembered it. Regards Abhay Inder wrote: Dear Abhay, As per rule Rahu is representing Jupiter, and as Jupiter is retro not to be considered so Rahu can not be taken as RPs. But, in my own experience I have seen that a retro planet should not be discarded but should be considered as RPs. Particularly if in the native's chart you are working same planet[say Jupiter in your example] is retro. I know this is very controversial but I have given my experience only. Moreover, RPs are used for timings of events. Then, retro rule of KP for discarding retro may be applicable. But if RPs are used for getting clue to some problems, then retro planet will give you sufficient clues. Inder , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2005 Report Share Posted April 30, 2005 Dear Abhay, As per rule Rahu is representing Jupiter, and as Jupiter is retro not to be considered so Rahu can not be taken as RPs. But, in my own experience I have seen that a retro planet should not be discarded but should be considered as RPs. Particularly if in the native's chart you are working same planet[say Jupiter in your example] is retro. I know this is very controversial but I have given my experience only. Moreover, RPs are used for timings of events. Then, retro rule of KP for discarding retro may be applicable. But if RPs are used for getting clue to some problems, then retro planet will give you sufficient clues. Inder , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2005 Report Share Posted April 30, 2005 Dear Inder Thanks for the reply. Yes, i have in mind your point that if any planet is Retro. & if the same planet is retro. in original chart also, then, it should be considered in RP. We need to observe this in many cases, then, we can definitely be sure about it. This rule might be true, but, see my exam. given below. Take my chart as an example, I have Jup. (retro) in my original chart, 2 days before i plotted a "Prashna Chart" which was of Pisces ascendant sign, wherein Reto. Jup was at 1st level in RP + Jup. was indicating favorable answer to my question. BUt, actually, the incidence has not happened, because i think, the Retro. planet always give negative answer (NO) only. Reto. Jup. has not given Positive result to my question even when it was signifying all the house required for the positive answer. So, think, the answer of Retro. planet is always "NO", irrespective of the original chart. Of course, we will need to observe more cases, but, this example was recent, so, i remembered it. Regards Abhay Inder wrote: Dear Abhay, As per rule Rahu is representing Jupiter, and as Jupiter is retro not to be considered so Rahu can not be taken as RPs. But, in my own experience I have seen that a retro planet should not be discarded but should be considered as RPs. Particularly if in the native's chart you are working same planet[say Jupiter in your example] is retro. I know this is very controversial but I have given my experience only. Moreover, RPs are used for timings of events. Then, retro rule of KP for discarding retro may be applicable. But if RPs are used for getting clue to some problems, then retro planet will give you sufficient clues. Inder , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2005 Report Share Posted May 1, 2005 Yes , I agree with you .Weshould observe more to come to any conclusions. Inder , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2005 Report Share Posted May 1, 2005 Yes , I agree with you .Weshould observe more to come to any conclusions. Inder , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Abhay 1. Yes,Rah will be a RP Ranade --- Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Members I just have one small query regardingRuling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer'ssign), we will add " Ketu " to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , wewill Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since " Rahu " is inJup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Abhay 1. Yes,Rah will be a RP Ranade --- Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Members I just have one small query regardingRuling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer'ssign), we will add " Ketu " to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , wewill Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since " Rahu " is inJup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2005 Report Share Posted May 7, 2005 Dear Inder, 1. Your understanding of to come up with further observation is a welcome development. Not thousands examples as you've said in a post not nedded but will need a sufficient number number of samples of observation to support your repeated against-KSK-KP retrogression view which is up to now not supported by any solid references of research. 2. Another welcome development is that you're now using Astraura's SW as mentioned by you in a post from the early stage of asking for Astraura's KP charts as shown below. It will help your observation. Regards, tw Message 14292 of 16344 < Previous | Next > " Inder " <indervohra2001 Mon Feb 7, 2005 7:11 am Re: A Curse/KP Chart? indervohra2001 Dear Bob, Yes, I was reading your chart as given here. This is your chart. Inder , " Bob Singh " <rayseth2001> wrote: > > Dear Mr. Inder, > If this is what you were talking about, it was posted by someone else > for me I think. I do not have the software to do this. Do confirm if > this is what you meant, when you said that prospects for marriage are > negligible. > > Regards > > Bob > > > > > Astraura's Vedic Horoscope > > > > > > > > System : Krishnamurthy Ayanamsa: 23° 18' 34 " > > > > Name : Bob Singh > > > > Place : Mangalore, India > > > > Date : 23-1-1968 Tuesday > > > > Time : 0-10-0 > > > > Longitude : 74-53-0 East > > > > Latitude : 12-52-0 North > > > > Zone : IST 5.5 > > > > Settings : Universal Time > > > > Sid.Time : 7° 44' 16 " > > > > Latitude : Geocentric > > > > Cusp System: Placidus > > > > > > > > Planet Longitude KP Pointer House > > > > Sun 8° Cp 30' 13.4945 " Sat-Sun-Ven-Mar 4 > > > > Mercury 23° Cp 59' 59.8564 " Sat-Mar-Mar-Ven 4 > > > > Venus 1° Sa 52' 5.8371 " Jup-Ket-Ven-Rah 3 > > > > Moon 7° Li 58' 49.0383 " Ven-Rah-Rah-Ven 1 > > > > Mars 17° Aq 6' 8.4962 " Sat-Rah-Ven-Mer 5 > > > > JupR) 10° Le 58' 57.3467 " Sun-Ket-Sat-Rah 11 > > > > Saturn 14° Pi 3' 47.0407 " Jup-Sat-Rah-Ket 6 > > > > Ura® 5° Vi 45' 2.8139 " Mer-Sun-Mer-Ven 12 > > > > Neptune 2° Sc 51' 59.1837 " Mar-Jup-Rah-Ven 2 > > > > Plu® 29° Le 20' 51.5505 " Sun-Sun-Rah-Rah 11 > > > > Rahu 29° Pi 31' 53.1315 " Jup-Mer-Sat-Rah 6 > > > > Ketu 29° Vi 31' 53.1315 " Mer-Mar-Sat-Rah 12 > > > > Lagna 2° Li 21' 32.643 " Ven-Mar-Ket-Jup 1 > > > > > > > > Cusps Longitude KP Pointer > > > > I 2° Li 21' 32.643 " Ven-Mar-Ket-Jup > > > > II 2° Sc 5' 32.7696 " Mar-Jup-Rah-Sat > > > > III 1° Sa 21' 46.2929 " Jup-Ket-Ven-Moo > > > > IV 0° Cp 51' 45.2597 " Sat-Sun-Rah-Sun > > > > V 1° Aq 29' 28.1121 " Sat-Mar-Mer-Jup > > > > VI 2° Pi 40' 11.9539 " Jup-Jup-Rah-Ven > > > > VII 2° Ar 21' 32.643 " Mar-Ket-Ven-Sat > > > > VIII 2° Ta 5' 32.7696 " Ven-Sun-Jup-Ket > > > > IX 1° Ge 21' 46.2929 " Mer-Mar-Mer-Jup > > > > X 0° Cn 51' 45.2597 " Moo-Jup-Mar-Sat > > > > XI 1° Le 29' 28.1121 " Sun-Ket-Ven-Mar > > > > XII 2° Vi 40' 11.9539 " Mer-Sun-Jup-Mar > > > > Fortuna 1° Cn 50' 8.1868 " Moo-Jup-Rah-Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun Rise/Set Upper Ray : 6 - 57 - 06 | 6 - 27 - 17 > > > > Sun Rise/Set Lower Ray : 7 - 0 - 44 | 6 - 23 - 39 > > > > Lagna : Thula Chitra 3 > > > > Birth Rasi (Moon Sign) : Thula > > > > Birth Star (Nakshatra) : Swati 1 > > > > Lunar Half (Paksha) : Krishna Paksha (Declining Phase) > > > > Lunar Day (Thithi) : Apara Ashthami 23 > > > > Yoga : Dhriti > > > > Karana : Balavam > > > > Dasa at DOB / DOQ : Rahu > > > > Dasa Balance : 16 Y:2 M:23 D > > > > Bhukti at DOB / DOQ : Rahu > > > > Bhukti Balance : 0 Y:11 M:8 D > > > > Current Date : 2/4/2005 > > > > Current Dasa running : Sat-Mer-Rah > > > > : Saturn Dasa upto: 16-Apr-2019 > > > > : Mercury Bhukti upto: 27-Dec-2005 > > > > : Rahu Antar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Bob Singh " > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > Dear Mr. Inder, > > I have never posted my KP chart. > > Regards > > Bob > > > > > > , " Inder " <indervohra2001> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Bob, > > > What I meant as you have posted your KP chart can you give their > > > charts? > > > Inder > > > > > > , " Bob Singh " > > > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Inder, > > > > Thank you for your analysis. The details of my brother and sister > > > are > > > > > > > > > > Brother > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > Name: Ro > > > > > > DOB: 6th July 1973 > > > > > > Time: 9:48 a.m. > > > > > > Place: Mumbai > > > > > > > > > > > > Sister > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > Name: Di > > > > > > DOB: 25th July 1975 > > > > > > Time: 1:49 a.m. > > > > > > Place: Mumbai > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Inder " > > > <indervohra2001> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hallo Bob, > > > > > You gave your Kp chart in some message above. Should have > > > analysed > > > > > by some KP astrologer.?? > > > > > As I see Saturn and Rahu in 6th house [12th to 7th], and other > > > > > configration show that prospects of marriage in your chart are > > > > > negligbe. Many planets are in the star and sub of negative > > > forces > > > > > like Sat, rahu, Ketu etc. Sun and Mer also donot contribute > > > anything > > > > > positive. > > > > > Mars jupiter axix can give you some good friendhip etc but > > > chances > > > > > of marriage are not there. > > > > > Sat(in own star) and Rahu in 6 also show that you are likely to > > > > > continue in job with decent earnings. > > > > > > > > > > Give chart of your brothe and sis to examine. > > > > > Good luck > > > > > > > > > > Inder > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " Bob Singh " > > > > > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tremendous concern and also that of my mother, that > > > both my > > > > > > brother and sister are not getting prospectives for marriage. > > > My > > > > > > brother meets a lot of girls, but somehow it does not stick. > > > As > > > > > for my > > > > > > sister, she just does not get mental compatibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > I too, as said earlier, am unmarried. > > > > > > > > > > > > Could there be a curse? This was suggested to me, that there > > > could > > > > > be > > > > > > a bad eye from a relative from my father's side. My father died > > > > > > suddenly August 12, 2000. > > > > > > > > > > > > Brother > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > Name: Ro > > > > > > DOB: 6th July 1973 > > > > > > Time: 9:48 a.m. > > > > > > Place: Mumbai > > > > > > > > > > > > Sister > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > Name: Di > > > > > > DOB: 25th July 1975 > > > > > > Time: 1:49 a.m. > > > > > > Place: Mumbai , " Inder " <indervohra2001> wrote: > Yes , I agree with you .Weshould observe more to come to any > conclusions. > Inder > > , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> wrote: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2005 Report Share Posted May 7, 2005 Dear TW, 1]It amazes me how you are stuck with BOb singh case. Most of the time, for any analysis I prepare my own chart, but as he had posted one KP chart, I used that. But I am wondering what you find so unususl in this case. 2] As regards sublord of any cusp in any retro star not giving positive result. I have seen in several case that this rule is failing. If that sublord and star lord are favourable then I hesitate to give negative results. This is my own experience. And no question of forcing it on others, so I say, that this should be seen/tested by all to believe/follow this. I hope I carified. Inder , " tw853 " <tw853> wrote: > Dear Inder, > > 1. Your understanding of to come up with further observation is a > welcome development. Not thousands examples as you've said in a post > not nedded but will need a sufficient number number of samples of > observation to support your repeated against-KSK-KP retrogression view > which is up to now not supported by any solid references of research. > > 2. Another welcome development is that you're now using Astraura's SW > as mentioned by you in a post from the early stage of asking for > Astraura's KP charts as shown below. It will help your observation. > > > Regards, > > tw > > > > > Message 14292 of 16344 < Previous | Next > > > > " Inder " <indervohra2001@> > Mon Feb 7, 2005 7:11 am > Re: A Curse/KP Chart? indervohra2001 > > > Dear Bob, > Yes, I was reading your chart as given here. > This is your chart. > Inder > > , " Bob Singh " > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > Dear Mr. Inder, > > If this is what you were talking about, it was posted by someone > else > > for me I think. I do not have the software to do this. Do confirm > if > > this is what you meant, when you said that prospects for marriage > are > > negligible. > > > > Regards > > > > Bob > > > > > > > Astraura's Vedic Horoscope > > > > > > > > > > System : Krishnamurthy Ayanamsa: 23° 18' 34 " > > > > > Name : Bob Singh > > > > > Place : Mangalore, India > > > > > Date : 23-1-1968 Tuesday > > > > > Time : 0-10-0 > > > > > Longitude : 74-53-0 East > > > > > Latitude : 12-52-0 North > > > > > Zone : IST 5.5 > > > > > Settings : Universal Time > > > > > Sid.Time : 7° 44' 16 " > > > > > Latitude : Geocentric > > > > > Cusp System: Placidus > > > > > > > > > > Planet Longitude KP Pointer House > > > > > Sun 8° Cp 30' 13.4945 " Sat-Sun-Ven-Mar 4 > > > > > Mercury 23° Cp 59' 59.8564 " Sat-Mar-Mar-Ven 4 > > > > > Venus 1° Sa 52' 5.8371 " Jup-Ket-Ven-Rah 3 > > > > > Moon 7° Li 58' 49.0383 " Ven-Rah-Rah-Ven 1 > > > > > Mars 17° Aq 6' 8.4962 " Sat-Rah-Ven-Mer 5 > > > > > JupR) 10° Le 58' 57.3467 " Sun-Ket-Sat-Rah 11 > > > > > Saturn 14° Pi 3' 47.0407 " Jup-Sat-Rah-Ket 6 > > > > > Ura® 5° Vi 45' 2.8139 " Mer-Sun-Mer-Ven 12 > > > > > Neptune 2° Sc 51' 59.1837 " Mar-Jup-Rah-Ven 2 > > > > > Plu® 29° Le 20' 51.5505 " Sun-Sun-Rah-Rah 11 > > > > > Rahu 29° Pi 31' 53.1315 " Jup-Mer-Sat-Rah 6 > > > > > Ketu 29° Vi 31' 53.1315 " Mer-Mar-Sat-Rah 12 > > > > > Lagna 2° Li 21' 32.643 " Ven-Mar-Ket-Jup 1 > > > > > > > > > > Cusps Longitude KP Pointer > > > > > I 2° Li 21' 32.643 " Ven-Mar-Ket-Jup > > > > > II 2° Sc 5' 32.7696 " Mar-Jup-Rah-Sat > > > > > III 1° Sa 21' 46.2929 " Jup-Ket-Ven-Moo > > > > > IV 0° Cp 51' 45.2597 " Sat-Sun-Rah-Sun > > > > > V 1° Aq 29' 28.1121 " Sat-Mar-Mer-Jup > > > > > VI 2° Pi 40' 11.9539 " Jup-Jup-Rah-Ven > > > > > VII 2° Ar 21' 32.643 " Mar-Ket-Ven-Sat > > > > > VIII 2° Ta 5' 32.7696 " Ven-Sun-Jup-Ket > > > > > IX 1° Ge 21' 46.2929 " Mer-Mar-Mer-Jup > > > > > X 0° Cn 51' 45.2597 " Moo-Jup-Mar-Sat > > > > > XI 1° Le 29' 28.1121 " Sun-Ket-Ven-Mar > > > > > XII 2° Vi 40' 11.9539 " Mer-Sun-Jup-Mar > > > > > Fortuna 1° Cn 50' 8.1868 " Moo-Jup-Rah-Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun Rise/Set Upper Ray : 6 - 57 - 06 | 6 - 27 - 17 > > > > > Sun Rise/Set Lower Ray : 7 - 0 - 44 | 6 - 23 - 39 > > > > > Lagna : Thula Chitra 3 > > > > > Birth Rasi (Moon Sign) : Thula > > > > > Birth Star (Nakshatra) : Swati 1 > > > > > Lunar Half (Paksha) : Krishna Paksha (Declining Phase) > > > > > Lunar Day (Thithi) : Apara Ashthami 23 > > > > > Yoga : Dhriti > > > > > Karana : Balavam > > > > > Dasa at DOB / DOQ : Rahu > > > > > Dasa Balance : 16 Y:2 M:23 D > > > > > Bhukti at DOB / DOQ : Rahu > > > > > Bhukti Balance : 0 Y:11 M:8 D > > > > > Current Date : 2/4/2005 > > > > > Current Dasa running : Sat-Mer-Rah > > > > > : Saturn Dasa upto: 16-Apr-2019 > > > > > : Mercury Bhukti upto: 27-Dec-2005 > > > > > : Rahu Antar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Bob Singh " > > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Mr. Inder, > > > I have never posted my KP chart. > > > Regards > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > , " Inder " > <indervohra2001> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Bob, > > > > What I meant as you have posted your KP chart can you give > their > > > > charts? > > > > Inder > > > > > > > > , " Bob Singh " > > > > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Inder, > > > > > Thank you for your analysis. The details of my brother and > sister > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > Brother > > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > > Name: Ro > > > > > > > DOB: 6th July 1973 > > > > > > > Time: 9:48 a.m. > > > > > > > Place: Mumbai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sister > > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > > Name: Di > > > > > > > DOB: 25th July 1975 > > > > > > > Time: 1:49 a.m. > > > > > > > Place: Mumbai > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Inder " > > > > <indervohra2001> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hallo Bob, > > > > > > You gave your Kp chart in some message above. Should have > > > > analysed > > > > > > by some KP astrologer.?? > > > > > > As I see Saturn and Rahu in 6th house [12th to 7th], and > other > > > > > > configration show that prospects of marriage in your chart > are > > > > > > negligbe. Many planets are in the star and sub of negative > > > > forces > > > > > > like Sat, rahu, Ketu etc. Sun and Mer also donot > contribute > > > > anything > > > > > > positive. > > > > > > Mars jupiter axix can give you some good friendhip etc but > > > > chances > > > > > > of marriage are not there. > > > > > > Sat(in own star) and Rahu in 6 also show that you are > likely to > > > > > > continue in job with decent earnings. > > > > > > > > > > > > Give chart of your brothe and sis to examine. > > > > > > Good luck > > > > > > > > > > > > Inder > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " Bob Singh " > > > > > > <rayseth2001> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tremendous concern and also that of my mother, > that > > > > both my > > > > > > > brother and sister are not getting prospectives for > marriage. > > > > My > > > > > > > brother meets a lot of girls, but somehow it does not > stick. > > > > As > > > > > > for my > > > > > > > sister, she just does not get mental compatibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I too, as said earlier, am unmarried. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could there be a curse? This was suggested to me, that > there > > > > could > > > > > > be > > > > > > > a bad eye from a relative from my father's side. My > father died > > > > > > > suddenly August 12, 2000. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brother > > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > > Name: Ro > > > > > > > DOB: 6th July 1973 > > > > > > > Time: 9:48 a.m. > > > > > > > Place: Mumbai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sister > > > > > > > ======= > > > > > > > Name: Di > > > > > > > DOB: 25th July 1975 > > > > > > > Time: 1:49 a.m. > > > > > > > Place: Mumbai , " Inder " <indervohra2001> wrote: > > Yes , I agree with you .Weshould observe more to come to any > > conclusions. > > Inder > > > > , Abhay Godse <abhaygodse@e...> > wrote: > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.