LK discussion group Lal Kitab 35 sala dasa Kulbir

[Guest guest]

Respected pt ji, thanks for taking time from your busy schedule.

Regards. Kulbir.

 

On 2/11/09, < wrote:

> Dear Kulbir,

>

> No. The dasha has to be worked out with sun's years included

> irrespective of who is the sun with.

> The same is true for all planets. All planets are to be represented

> in the dasha system.

>

> God bless you,

>

> Bhooshan Priya

>

>

>

, kulbir bance

> <kulbirbance wrote:

>>

>> Respected Pt. Ji,

>>

>> i too have a querry. In situations like 1. When sun

>> is with rahu, the era of sun is zero years. Do we cut the 2 years

>> allotment given to sun and proceed with moon instead.

>>

>> Regards.

>>

>> Kulbir.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> On 2/11/09, < wrote:

>> > Dear Narendra,

>> >

>> > As we all know the dasha system in Indian astrology evolved

> hundreds

>> > of years ago. When maharshi Parashar conceived the dasha sytem,

> or

>> > when maharshi Jaimini conceived them which calendar was in vogue?

>> >

>> > It was not the 365 year calendar of today.

>> >

>> > The traditional Indian calendar had always been of 360 days

> based on

>> > the moon.

>> > Since all the dasha systems are worked out based on the Nakshatra

>> > traversed by moon therefore it is logical to use the nakshatra

> varsh

>> > or the lunar year of 360 days while working out the dasha.

>> >

>> > Just one more thing, work out the Lal Kitab dasha through Raman’s

>> > Ayanansha. You might get better results. No harm in

> experimenting.

>> >

>> > God bless you

>> >

>> > Bhooshan Priya

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > , " junejanarendra "

>> > <junejanarendra@> wrote:

>> >>

>> >> Respected Bhooshan Priya ji,

>> >>

>> >> Your method to work out the Lal Kitab 35 year dasa is simply

>> > superb to

>> >> say the least. It is a major break through as far the Lal Kitab

> is

>> >> concerned.

>> >> I have one serious question. Sir, you calculate the dasa taking

> a

>> > year

>> >> for 360 days instead of 365 days since you deduct 5 days for

> each

>> >> year. All the soft wares calculate the dasa systems with 365 day

>> > year.

>> >> Why this anomaly, sir.

>> >>

>> >> Narendra Juneja

>> >>

>> >

>> >

>> >

>>

>> --

>> Sent from my mobile device

>>

>

>

>

 

--

Sent from my mobile device