Guest guest Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 Respected MembersThe budh is only planet which has various charatcteristics.LAT PAT 35 CHATAR SUJAN, KAHO GANGA RAMA SHREE BHAGWAAN.Ye ibaarat agar bakhoobi samajh aa jaaye to iski buniyaad par rin pitri se lekar budh ke bhed tak ka asool apne aap main bahut kuchh spasht kar daaltaa hai. Yah "kundali se kundali main" tak ke safar main har jagah maujood hai.Maslan agar hum kisi kundali main dekhtain hai ki ketu to hai khana 9 main aur Budh hai khana no. 6 main to Yah ek taraf to Rin Pitri ki pratham avastha ki taraf isharaa kar deta hai doosri taraf yah budh bhi ab AQAL KI NAQAL ki salaahiyyat ke paathh(Leson) yaani ki khana 9 ke ketu ke asool par chalegaa lekin iskaa matlab yah nahi ki yah khana 9 ki AQAL KI NAKAL ki kuvvat ke asool se judaa rahegaa.Lekin agar yahi budh (budh ke jaati swabhaav ke hisaab se) shani ki haisiyat ka sabit hua to iskaa apnaa asal swabhaav shani se judaa nahi ho sakta.( Budh Ka jaati swabhav grahon ki taqat ke hisab se nikaalne ka tarikaa lalkitab main diyaa hua hai.) Aise main hum yah keh saktey hai ki aqal ki naqal kartey huve bhi yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki aankh to kabhi kuttey ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah saktaa. Shayd yahi vazah hai ki budh khana 6 main hone par pandit ji ne qaifiyat "kehna - sunanaa" likha hai. Matlab kehnaa to budh ki qaifiyat hai aur sunana Ketu ki. ( Jaroori nahi ki ketu 9 main hee ho kahin bhi ho saktaa hai) Doosri taraf ek sawal yah bhi hai ki khana no. 9 se iska talluq TOTEY KI 35 main kahin nahi hai, Mere vichaar se to iskaa jawaab yahi ho saktaa hai ki-- lalkitab ke mutabik khana no 9 khud aqal hai , to aise main Budh ko khana no. 9 se Aqal ki Naqal karne ki kuvvat to haasil ho gayee ,lekin use kyaa ratvaayaa ja rahaa hai yah uskaa judaa judaa khane ke us grah ki qaifiyat par bhi nirbhar hai jiska ki vah pakka ghar hai. Sahi maayno main Naqal main khud Generate karne ki Taqat nahi hoti. Maslan agar kisi ko 2 X 2 = 4 samjhaaya gaya aur usi formule ke aadhaar par 2 x3 =6 khud ba khud haasil kiyaa to yah kuvvat hee AQAL hai jo ki khana no. 9 se talluq rakhti hai. Lekin agar kisi nursery class ke student ko 2 ka table ratvaayaa gayaa aur jab tak use iskaa logical view nahi pataa ,bus usne rat liyaa to yah aqal ki naqal hai, jis din use iskaa logical view samajh aa gayaa to naqal khatam sirf AQAL hai. Yahi karan hai ki khana no 9 ka zikra is totey ki 35 main nahi diya gaya. Kyonki totey ki 35 main agar totaa khana 9 ki naqal kartaa to totaa rahtaa hee nahi ,vah to insaan ban jaataa. Doosri taraf totey ko chaahey jo bhi ratvaayaa jaaye ,rahegaa to totaa hee vo insaan ban nahi saktaa. Aqal ki naqal kee ja sakti hai lekin naqal kabhi aqal ka darzaa haasil nahi kar sakti. Yah to ek aam asool hai. Vastav main meraa yah ek prayaas hai jo ki shayd hee ek baar main kisi ki samajh main aaye. Isiliye Sabhi members se meri guzaarish hai ki is budh ke bhed main ulajhne ya sulajhne se pehley bakhoobi lalkitab ko samjhain. Varnaa Kisi ki kyaa haisiyat hai ki budh ke raav dhang ko kuchh shabdon main baandh sakey. Mujhe to aisaa lagtaa hai ki agar kabhi kisi ne Pujya Pandit ji se bhi is budhh ke bhed ke baarey main poochha hogaa to unhone bhi yahi salaah dee hogi ki pehley baaki kitaab padh lo aur samajh lo,fir ismain ulajhnaa. BUDH TO HAI BUDH ,BAAKI SAB SHUDH. KEHNE KO MUKHANNAS,NACHAAVE LEKIN SAB KO, JISE AAYAA SAMAJH , KHUD BA KHUD VAHI BAN GAYAA BUDH ( Buddhimaan , vidvaan).With RegardsPt.LalkitabeeV.Shukla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 Dear Vipin, This is a beautiful and extremely valuable contribution. This would help in understanding the nature of the least understood planet like Mercury I loved your expression when you said: yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki aankh to kabhi kuttey ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah saktaa. I was wondering if the last lines could also be read as: Jise aya samajh, khud ba khud voh na raha niraa budh ka budh[ planet] God bless you, Bhooshan Priya , "lalkitabee" <lalkitabee wrote:>> Respected Members> > The budh is only planet which has various charatcteristics.> > LAT PAT 35 CHATAR SUJAN, KAHO GANGA RAMA SHREE BHAGWAAN.> > Ye ibaarat agar bakhoobi samajh aa jaaye to iski buniyaad par rin pitri> se lekar budh ke bhed tak ka asool apne aap main bahut kuchh spasht kar> daaltaa hai. Yah "kundali se kundali main" tak ke safar main har jagah> maujood hai.Maslan agar hum kisi kundali main dekhtain hai ki ketu to> hai khana 9 main aur Budh hai khana no. 6 main to Yah ek taraf to Rin> Pitri ki pratham avastha ki taraf isharaa kar deta hai doosri taraf yah> budh bhi ab AQAL KI NAQAL ki salaahiyyat ke paathh(Leson) yaani ki khana> 9 ke ketu ke asool par chalegaa lekin iskaa matlab yah nahi ki yah khana> 9 ki AQAL KI NAKAL ki kuvvat ke asool se judaa rahegaa.Lekin agar yahi> budh (budh ke jaati swabhaav ke hisaab se) shani ki haisiyat ka sabit> hua to iskaa apnaa asal swabhaav shani se judaa nahi ho sakta.( Budh Ka> jaati swabhav grahon ki taqat ke hisab se nikaalne ka tarikaa lalkitab> main diyaa hua hai.) Aise main hum yah keh saktey hai ki aqal ki naqal> kartey huve bhi yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki aankh> to kabhi kuttey ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah saktaa.> Shayd yahi vazah hai ki budh khana 6 main hone par pandit ji ne qaifiyat> "kehna - sunanaa" likha hai. Matlab kehnaa to budh ki qaifiyat hai aur> sunana Ketu ki. ( Jaroori nahi ki ketu 9 main hee ho kahin bhi ho saktaa> hai)> > Doosri taraf ek sawal yah bhi hai ki khana no. 9 se iska talluq> TOTEY KI 35 main kahin nahi hai, Mere vichaar se to iskaa jawaab yahi ho> saktaa hai ki-- lalkitab ke mutabik khana no 9 khud aqal hai , to aise> main Budh ko khana no. 9 se Aqal ki Naqal karne ki kuvvat to haasil ho> gayee ,lekin use kyaa ratvaayaa ja rahaa hai yah uskaa judaa judaa khane> ke us grah ki qaifiyat par bhi nirbhar hai jiska ki vah pakka ghar hai.> Sahi maayno main Naqal main khud Generate karne ki Taqat nahi hoti.> Maslan agar kisi ko 2 X 2 = 4 samjhaaya gaya aur usi formule ke aadhaar> par 2 x3 =6 khud ba khud haasil kiyaa to yah kuvvat hee AQAL hai jo ki> khana no. 9 se talluq rakhti hai. Lekin agar kisi nursery class ke> student ko 2 ka table ratvaayaa gayaa aur jab tak use iskaa logical view> nahi pataa ,bus usne rat liyaa to yah aqal ki naqal hai, jis din use> iskaa logical view samajh aa gayaa to naqal khatam sirf AQAL hai. Yahi> karan hai ki khana no 9 ka zikra is totey ki 35 main nahi diya gaya.> Kyonki totey ki 35 main agar totaa khana 9 ki naqal kartaa to totaa> rahtaa hee nahi ,vah to insaan ban jaataa. Doosri taraf totey ko chaahey> jo bhi ratvaayaa jaaye ,rahegaa to totaa hee vo insaan ban nahi saktaa.> Aqal ki naqal kee ja sakti hai lekin naqal kabhi aqal ka darzaa haasil> nahi kar sakti. Yah to ek aam asool hai.> > > Vastav main meraa yah ek prayaas hai jo ki shayd hee ek> baar main kisi ki samajh main aaye. Isiliye Sabhi members se meri> guzaarish hai ki is budh ke bhed main ulajhne ya sulajhne se pehley> bakhoobi lalkitab ko samjhain. Varnaa Kisi ki kyaa haisiyat hai ki budh> ke raav dhang ko kuchh shabdon main baandh sakey. Mujhe to aisaa lagtaa> hai ki agar kabhi kisi ne Pujya Pandit ji se bhi is budhh ke bhed ke> baarey main poochha hogaa to unhone bhi yahi salaah dee hogi ki pehley> baaki kitaab padh lo aur samajh lo,fir ismain ulajhnaa.> BUDH TO HAI BUDH ,BAAKI SAB SHUDH.> KEHNE KO MUKHANNAS,NACHAAVE LEKIN SAB KO,> JISE AAYAA SAMAJH , KHUD BA KHUD> VAHI BAN GAYAA BUDH ( Buddhimaan , vidvaan).> With Regards> Pt.Lalkitabee> V.Shukla> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 Sir Lalkitabee ji Thank you for explaining the concept of mercury. Sir, we hope to have many more such insights from you on Lal Kitab concepts. With respect Girish Raheja , " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee wrote: > > Respected Members > > The budh is only planet which has various charatcteristics. > > LAT PAT 35 CHATAR SUJAN, KAHO GANGA RAMA SHREE BHAGWAAN. > > Ye ibaarat agar bakhoobi samajh aa jaaye to iski buniyaad par rin pitri > se lekar budh ke bhed tak ka asool apne aap main bahut kuchh spasht kar > daaltaa hai. Yah " kundali se kundali main " tak ke safar main har jagah > maujood hai.Maslan agar hum kisi kundali main dekhtain hai ki ketu to > hai khana 9 main aur Budh hai khana no. 6 main to Yah ek taraf to Rin > Pitri ki pratham avastha ki taraf isharaa kar deta hai doosri taraf yah > budh bhi ab AQAL KI NAQAL ki salaahiyyat ke paathh(Leson) yaani ki khana > 9 ke ketu ke asool par chalegaa lekin iskaa matlab yah nahi ki yah khana > 9 ki AQAL KI NAKAL ki kuvvat ke asool se judaa rahegaa.Lekin agar yahi > budh (budh ke jaati swabhaav ke hisaab se) shani ki haisiyat ka sabit > hua to iskaa apnaa asal swabhaav shani se judaa nahi ho sakta.( Budh Ka > jaati swabhav grahon ki taqat ke hisab se nikaalne ka tarikaa lalkitab > main diyaa hua hai.) Aise main hum yah keh saktey hai ki aqal ki naqal > kartey huve bhi yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki aankh > to kabhi kuttey ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah saktaa. > Shayd yahi vazah hai ki budh khana 6 main hone par pandit ji ne qaifiyat > " kehna - sunanaa " likha hai. Matlab kehnaa to budh ki qaifiyat hai aur > sunana Ketu ki. ( Jaroori nahi ki ketu 9 main hee ho kahin bhi ho saktaa > hai) > > Doosri taraf ek sawal yah bhi hai ki khana no. 9 se iska talluq > TOTEY KI 35 main kahin nahi hai, Mere vichaar se to iskaa jawaab yahi ho > saktaa hai ki-- lalkitab ke mutabik khana no 9 khud aqal hai , to aise > main Budh ko khana no. 9 se Aqal ki Naqal karne ki kuvvat to haasil ho > gayee ,lekin use kyaa ratvaayaa ja rahaa hai yah uskaa judaa judaa khane > ke us grah ki qaifiyat par bhi nirbhar hai jiska ki vah pakka ghar hai. > Sahi maayno main Naqal main khud Generate karne ki Taqat nahi hoti. > Maslan agar kisi ko 2 X 2 = 4 samjhaaya gaya aur usi formule ke aadhaar > par 2 x3 =6 khud ba khud haasil kiyaa to yah kuvvat hee AQAL hai jo ki > khana no. 9 se talluq rakhti hai. Lekin agar kisi nursery class ke > student ko 2 ka table ratvaayaa gayaa aur jab tak use iskaa logical view > nahi pataa ,bus usne rat liyaa to yah aqal ki naqal hai, jis din use > iskaa logical view samajh aa gayaa to naqal khatam sirf AQAL hai. Yahi > karan hai ki khana no 9 ka zikra is totey ki 35 main nahi diya gaya. > Kyonki totey ki 35 main agar totaa khana 9 ki naqal kartaa to totaa > rahtaa hee nahi ,vah to insaan ban jaataa. Doosri taraf totey ko chaahey > jo bhi ratvaayaa jaaye ,rahegaa to totaa hee vo insaan ban nahi saktaa. > Aqal ki naqal kee ja sakti hai lekin naqal kabhi aqal ka darzaa haasil > nahi kar sakti. Yah to ek aam asool hai. > > > Vastav main meraa yah ek prayaas hai jo ki shayd hee ek > baar main kisi ki samajh main aaye. Isiliye Sabhi members se meri > guzaarish hai ki is budh ke bhed main ulajhne ya sulajhne se pehley > bakhoobi lalkitab ko samjhain. Varnaa Kisi ki kyaa haisiyat hai ki budh > ke raav dhang ko kuchh shabdon main baandh sakey. Mujhe to aisaa lagtaa > hai ki agar kabhi kisi ne Pujya Pandit ji se bhi is budhh ke bhed ke > baarey main poochha hogaa to unhone bhi yahi salaah dee hogi ki pehley > baaki kitaab padh lo aur samajh lo,fir ismain ulajhnaa. > BUDH TO HAI BUDH ,BAAKI SAB SHUDH. > KEHNE KO MUKHANNAS,NACHAAVE LEKIN SAB KO, > JISE AAYAA SAMAJH , KHUD BA KHUD > VAHI BAN GAYAA BUDH ( Buddhimaan , vidvaan). > With Regards > Pt.Lalkitabee > V.Shukla > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 Respected GurudevPranamIm just like a kid bfore u,thanx for such a good astrological lyric. .In fact u have corrected me.Really the lines written by u---Jise aya samajh, khud ba khud voh na raha niraa budh ka budh[ planet] properly explain my point of view.May god bless me with ur guidence till the completion of my 3rd 35 year cycle of life.With regardsV.Shukla , "" < wrote:>> > Dear Vipin,> > This is a beautiful and extremely valuable contribution. This would help> in understanding the nature of the least understood planet like Mercury> > I loved your expression when you said:> > yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki aankh to kabhi kuttey> ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah saktaa.> > I was wondering if the last lines could also be read as:> > Jise aya samajh, khud ba khud> > voh na raha niraa budh ka budh[ planet]> > God bless you,> > Bhooshan Priya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "lalkitabee"> lalkitabee@ wrote:> >> > Respected Members> >> > The budh is only planet which has various charatcteristics.> >> > LAT PAT 35 CHATAR SUJAN, KAHO GANGA RAMA SHREE BHAGWAAN.> >> > Ye ibaarat agar bakhoobi samajh aa jaaye to iski buniyaad par rin> pitri> > se lekar budh ke bhed tak ka asool apne aap main bahut kuchh spasht> kar> > daaltaa hai. Yah "kundali se kundali main" tak ke safar main har jagah> > maujood hai.Maslan agar hum kisi kundali main dekhtain hai ki ketu to> > hai khana 9 main aur Budh hai khana no. 6 main to Yah ek taraf to Rin> > Pitri ki pratham avastha ki taraf isharaa kar deta hai doosri taraf> yah> > budh bhi ab AQAL KI NAQAL ki salaahiyyat ke paathh(Leson) yaani ki> khana> > 9 ke ketu ke asool par chalegaa lekin iskaa matlab yah nahi ki yah> khana> > 9 ki AQAL KI NAKAL ki kuvvat ke asool se judaa rahegaa.Lekin agar yahi> > budh (budh ke jaati swabhaav ke hisaab se) shani ki haisiyat ka sabit> > hua to iskaa apnaa asal swabhaav shani se judaa nahi ho sakta.( Budh> Ka> > jaati swabhav grahon ki taqat ke hisab se nikaalne ka tarikaa lalkitab> > main diyaa hua hai.) Aise main hum yah keh saktey hai ki aqal ki naqal> > kartey huve bhi yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki> aankh> > to kabhi kuttey ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah> saktaa.> > Shayd yahi vazah hai ki budh khana 6 main hone par pandit ji ne> qaifiyat> > "kehna - sunanaa" likha hai. Matlab kehnaa to budh ki qaifiyat hai aur> > sunana Ketu ki. ( Jaroori nahi ki ketu 9 main hee ho kahin bhi ho> saktaa> > hai)> >> > Doosri taraf ek sawal yah bhi hai ki khana no. 9 se iska talluq> > TOTEY KI 35 main kahin nahi hai, Mere vichaar se to iskaa jawaab yahi> ho> > saktaa hai ki-- lalkitab ke mutabik khana no 9 khud aqal hai , to aise> > main Budh ko khana no. 9 se Aqal ki Naqal karne ki kuvvat to haasil ho> > gayee ,lekin use kyaa ratvaayaa ja rahaa hai yah uskaa judaa judaa> khane> > ke us grah ki qaifiyat par bhi nirbhar hai jiska ki vah pakka ghar> hai.> > Sahi maayno main Naqal main khud Generate karne ki Taqat nahi hoti.> > Maslan agar kisi ko 2 X 2 = 4 samjhaaya gaya aur usi formule ke> aadhaar> > par 2 x3 =6 khud ba khud haasil kiyaa to yah kuvvat hee AQAL hai jo ki> > khana no. 9 se talluq rakhti hai. Lekin agar kisi nursery class ke> > student ko 2 ka table ratvaayaa gayaa aur jab tak use iskaa logical> view> > nahi pataa ,bus usne rat liyaa to yah aqal ki naqal hai, jis din use> > iskaa logical view samajh aa gayaa to naqal khatam sirf AQAL hai. Yahi> > karan hai ki khana no 9 ka zikra is totey ki 35 main nahi diya gaya.> > Kyonki totey ki 35 main agar totaa khana 9 ki naqal kartaa to totaa> > rahtaa hee nahi ,vah to insaan ban jaataa. Doosri taraf totey ko> chaahey> > jo bhi ratvaayaa jaaye ,rahegaa to totaa hee vo insaan ban nahi> saktaa.> > Aqal ki naqal kee ja sakti hai lekin naqal kabhi aqal ka darzaa haasil> > nahi kar sakti. Yah to ek aam asool hai.> >> >> > Vastav main meraa yah ek prayaas hai jo ki shayd hee ek> > baar main kisi ki samajh main aaye. Isiliye Sabhi members se meri> > guzaarish hai ki is budh ke bhed main ulajhne ya sulajhne se pehley> > bakhoobi lalkitab ko samjhain. Varnaa Kisi ki kyaa haisiyat hai ki> budh> > ke raav dhang ko kuchh shabdon main baandh sakey. Mujhe to aisaa> lagtaa> > hai ki agar kabhi kisi ne Pujya Pandit ji se bhi is budhh ke bhed ke> > baarey main poochha hogaa to unhone bhi yahi salaah dee hogi ki pehley> > baaki kitaab padh lo aur samajh lo,fir ismain ulajhnaa.> > BUDH TO HAI BUDH ,BAAKI SAB SHUDH.> > KEHNE KO MUKHANNAS,NACHAAVE LEKIN SAB KO,> > JISE AAYAA SAMAJH , KHUD BA KHUD> > VAHI BAN GAYAA BUDH ( Buddhimaan , vidvaan).> > With Regards> > Pt.Lalkitabee> > V.Shukla> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 Respected Raheja Ji I think u already grasped the theme of this budh from lalkitab,only such a person who has read thoroughly might use such words. Thanx for these kind words,in fact here are more insightful statures than me. With Regards Pt.Lalkitabee V.Shukla , " girish_raheja " <girish_raheja wrote: > > Sir Lalkitabee ji > > Thank you for explaining the concept of mercury. Sir, we hope to > have many more such insights from you on Lal Kitab concepts. > > With respect > > Girish Raheja > > > , " lalkitabee " > <lalkitabee@> wrote: > > > > Respected Members > > > > The budh is only planet which has various charatcteristics. > > > > LAT PAT 35 CHATAR SUJAN, KAHO GANGA RAMA SHREE BHAGWAAN. > > > > Ye ibaarat agar bakhoobi samajh aa jaaye to iski buniyaad par rin > pitri > > se lekar budh ke bhed tak ka asool apne aap main bahut kuchh > spasht kar > > daaltaa hai. Yah " kundali se kundali main " tak ke safar main har > jagah > > maujood hai.Maslan agar hum kisi kundali main dekhtain hai ki ketu > to > > hai khana 9 main aur Budh hai khana no. 6 main to Yah ek taraf to > Rin > > Pitri ki pratham avastha ki taraf isharaa kar deta hai doosri > taraf yah > > budh bhi ab AQAL KI NAQAL ki salaahiyyat ke paathh(Leson) yaani ki > khana > > 9 ke ketu ke asool par chalegaa lekin iskaa matlab yah nahi ki yah > khana > > 9 ki AQAL KI NAKAL ki kuvvat ke asool se judaa rahegaa.Lekin agar > yahi > > budh (budh ke jaati swabhaav ke hisaab se) shani ki haisiyat ka > sabit > > hua to iskaa apnaa asal swabhaav shani se judaa nahi ho sakta.( > Budh Ka > > jaati swabhav grahon ki taqat ke hisab se nikaalne ka tarikaa > lalkitab > > main diyaa hua hai.) Aise main hum yah keh saktey hai ki aqal ki > naqal > > kartey huve bhi yah totaa rahegaa to totaa hee lekin kabhi baaz ki > aankh > > to kabhi kuttey ki dum ke asar se kisi keemat par judaa nahi rah > saktaa. > > Shayd yahi vazah hai ki budh khana 6 main hone par pandit ji ne > qaifiyat > > " kehna - sunanaa " likha hai. Matlab kehnaa to budh ki qaifiyat hai > aur > > sunana Ketu ki. ( Jaroori nahi ki ketu 9 main hee ho kahin bhi ho > saktaa > > hai) > > > > Doosri taraf ek sawal yah bhi hai ki khana no. 9 se iska talluq > > TOTEY KI 35 main kahin nahi hai, Mere vichaar se to iskaa jawaab > yahi ho > > saktaa hai ki-- lalkitab ke mutabik khana no 9 khud aqal hai , to > aise > > main Budh ko khana no. 9 se Aqal ki Naqal karne ki kuvvat to > haasil ho > > gayee ,lekin use kyaa ratvaayaa ja rahaa hai yah uskaa judaa judaa > khane > > ke us grah ki qaifiyat par bhi nirbhar hai jiska ki vah pakka ghar > hai. > > Sahi maayno main Naqal main khud Generate karne ki Taqat > nahi hoti. > > Maslan agar kisi ko 2 X 2 = 4 samjhaaya gaya aur usi formule ke > aadhaar > > par 2 x3 =6 khud ba khud haasil kiyaa to yah kuvvat hee AQAL hai > jo ki > > khana no. 9 se talluq rakhti hai. Lekin agar kisi nursery class ke > > student ko 2 ka table ratvaayaa gayaa aur jab tak use iskaa > logical view > > nahi pataa ,bus usne rat liyaa to yah aqal ki naqal hai, jis din > use > > iskaa logical view samajh aa gayaa to naqal khatam sirf AQAL hai. > Yahi > > karan hai ki khana no 9 ka zikra is totey ki 35 main nahi diya > gaya. > > Kyonki totey ki 35 main agar totaa khana 9 ki naqal kartaa to totaa > > rahtaa hee nahi ,vah to insaan ban jaataa. Doosri taraf totey ko > chaahey > > jo bhi ratvaayaa jaaye ,rahegaa to totaa hee vo insaan ban nahi > saktaa. > > Aqal ki naqal kee ja sakti hai lekin naqal kabhi aqal ka darzaa > haasil > > nahi kar sakti. Yah to ek aam asool hai. > > > > > > Vastav main meraa yah ek prayaas hai jo ki shayd hee ek > > baar main kisi ki samajh main aaye. Isiliye Sabhi members se meri > > guzaarish hai ki is budh ke bhed main ulajhne ya sulajhne se pehley > > bakhoobi lalkitab ko samjhain. Varnaa Kisi ki kyaa haisiyat hai ki > budh > > ke raav dhang ko kuchh shabdon main baandh sakey. Mujhe to aisaa > lagtaa > > hai ki agar kabhi kisi ne Pujya Pandit ji se bhi is budhh ke bhed > ke > > baarey main poochha hogaa to unhone bhi yahi salaah dee hogi ki > pehley > > baaki kitaab padh lo aur samajh lo,fir ismain ulajhnaa. > > BUDH TO HAI BUDH ,BAAKI SAB SHUDH. > > KEHNE KO MUKHANNAS,NACHAAVE LEKIN SAB KO, > > JISE AAYAA SAMAJH , KHUD BA KHUD > > VAHI BAN GAYAA BUDH ( Buddhimaan , vidvaan). > > With Regards > > Pt.Lalkitabee > > V.Shukla > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.