Guest guest Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Respected Kalsi Ji Again wrong interpretation-- Vishkanya is the woman ,who she comes in contact with, he will suffer phisically or may die.Not neccesserily through marriage. MATLAB YAH HAI KI VAH AURAT JISKE SANSARG MAIN AANE WALE PURUSH KO SHAARIRIK APGHAAT HO JAAYE YA HO SAKTAA HAI KI USKI MAUT BHI HO JAAYE, VISHKANYA KEHLAATI HAI.SHAADI KI SHART JAROORI NAHI HAI. AUR PUJYA PANDIT JI KI LINE " KHASAM KHANI VAH AURAT HO " KA BHI SEEDHA SEEDHA YAHI MATLAB HO SAKTAA HAI. VKY is not other context, it is also in lalkitab with the word " KHASAM-KHANI AURAT " Regarding ur wolf & lamb - Only u can like to call the contents of lalkitab as lamb. In my opinion these r LIONS & a true lalkitab scholar is a daring rider of lion.Thanx for ur kind suggestions. With Regards Pt.Lalkitabee V.Shukla , " Shivdev Kalsi " <shivdev.kalsi wrote: > > Respected Trivedi Ji, > > Vishkanyas do not have husbands. I remember the story of " The Wolf and the > Lamb " . > > In my opinion, here Lamb is contents of Lalkitab. Come what may , all of KSY > & VKY preachers started one or other pretext to force the war to justify > these yogas with LK contents. > > I feel let the contents of Lalkitab be treated in right way > > Regards > > > On 8/21/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Kalsi ji, > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned the *Vish Kanya yog* on page 1066 of 1952 urdu ed > > : > > > > Shatru shukra budh har do dekhen, milti baithak khwah alheda ho > > Surya ketu aa budh pe chamke, khasam khani voh aurat ho > > > > Regards, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Shivdev Kalsi " > > <shivdev.kalsi@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shukla Ji, > > > > > > In this case Elephant does not exist neither in Africa nor in Asia. I > > mean > > > there is no mention of this yoga in Hora Prashara the main collection of > > > astrological systems. There is no mention of this yoga in Ashtakvarga, > > nor > > > there is any deduction of Bindus/rekhas on this position of planets. > > > > > > In Jaimini I donot find any mention there in also in Horary there is no > > > mention of it. > > > > > > There is no harm to do research in any field. But it is not a right > > practice > > > to force unethical practices on innocent people in the name of holy > > > shashtras. > > > > > > Almost all the practising astrologers create fear psychosis in the name > > of > > > KalaSarpa Yoga. this is not a good practice to grab money from poor > > innocent > > > people. > > > > > > Regarding Vishkanya and other yogas, One shall keep himself to the system > > he > > > is studying. these yogas should be discussed where the shastras > > containing > > > these yogas are discussed and should not be intermingled with others. > > > > > > Every system has his own rules and regulations. If I want to justify > > > allopathy with ayurvedic or homoeopathy formulation then it is not called > > a > > > good pratice. all these system have there own course of remedies and > > > diagonose. > > > > > > If ih this group Lalkitab is discussed then all should discuss lalkitab. > > Not > > > to insert other ideologies. > > > > > > Let us keep ourselves away from this human nature to justify our wrong > > > doings in the name of research or something else. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:24 AM, lalkitabee lalkitabee@ wrote: > > > > > > > Respected Mr. Wandahl > > > > Kaalsarp yog is also a yog.U r known about -how it can be decided in a > > > > horoscope. If the same situation may be described in lalkitab without > > > > any name with some other definations, > > > > what will u say it ? It can be called Kaalsarp Yog bcoz no other > > > > word seems adequate for this. As example- elephants are in Africa & > > > > Asia with some phisical differences. But there is no contradiction > > > > about the use of the word " elephant " . In the same way reading about > > > > Kaalsarp Yog in perview of lalkitab ,is a reading out of the text, not > > > > only into the text. U can bring out pearls after a deep dive into the > > > > sea. The " read-out " theory cant be assumed without " read-into " > > > > fundamentals.At other side - " about the fear of general peoples " is a > > > > defferent scenerio.Not only kaalsarp Yog is in this category of > > > > fear-generator group. But it > > > > > > > > doesn't mean to stop read or learn about this or type of these yogas. > > > > Today u r saying not to support this Kaal Sarp Yog, after some days > > > > other will say -not to support VISHKANYA YOG etc. After all how a > > > > scholar can stop his readings or researches ? > > > > Electricity is hazardous , but the theory of > > > > electricity is not hazardous & reading of this theory can be helpful > > > > from safety-point of view from electricity. > > > > With Regards > > > > Pt.Lalkitabee > > > > V.Shukla > > > > www.lalkitabee.com > > > > <% > > 40>, > > > > " Finn Wandahl " > > > > finn.wandahl@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. KP Miglani, > > > > > > > > > > There is absolutely NOTHING about Kala Sarpa Yoga in the great Lal > > > > > Kitab, no matter how much we twist or bend the text. > > > > > > > > > > Please always remember, we are supposed to read out of the text, not > > > > > into the text. After all, we are not the writers of the great Lal > > > > > Kitab, Pt. Roop Chand Joshi was. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Finn Wandahl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <% > > 40>, > > > > " kpmiglani " > > > > > <kpmiglani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Varun Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with you. I was wondering if you have read the section on > > > > > > Rahu + Ketu in the 1952 edition on page 323 of Arun Sanhita. I do > > > > > > not have the Urdu edition because I can not read urdu. I do not > > know > > > > > > why, but it sounds to me that the book is talking about the kalsarp > > > > > > yog in that context. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > KP Miglani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In <% > > 40>, > > > > " varun_trvd " > > > > > > <varun_trvd@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Miglani ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your point is well taken. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I accept that all planets hemmed by rahu and ketu and half the > > > > > > > horoscope going empty does give the horoscope a different look. > > > > > > What > > > > > > > I am against is the scare that has been caused by this; or > > > > > > treating > > > > > > > this placement as a curse. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, it has not been proved beyond doubt that whatever ills, > > > > > > if > > > > > > > at all, accrue are because of this placement. Till such time that > > > > > > > the ills in the horoscope get associated with this placement, I > > > > > > > would personally like to keep this in the grey area of research. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In academic research all possibilities are examined and > > evaluated. > > > > > > > Those not found tenable are left; they are not dumped. You never > > > > > > > know some body else comes up with a better explanation later > > which > > > > > > > proves the existence of a Kal Sarp Yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can not dump Kal Sarp Yog simply because this placement did not > > > > > > > find a mention in the classics. In other fields of life there are > > > > > > > quite a few things which did not find a mention in old texts and > > > > > > are > > > > > > > a reality today. Therefore we can not dump a thing on the basis > > > > > > that > > > > > > > classics are silent about it. Similarly I will not accept it to > > be > > > > > > a > > > > > > > reality till such time that it is proved beyond doubt that a Yog > > > > > > > like Kal Sarp Yog exists and these are the effects of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore I do not dump the Kal Sarp Yog as a figment of > > > > > > > imagination, nor would give more credence then what it deserves. > > > > > > > When I said that I treat it a matter of grey area research, it > > > > > > means > > > > > > > that I accept its possible existence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In <% > > 40>, > > > > " kpmiglani " > > > > > > > <kpmiglani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Finn and Varun, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you agree that if all the planets are on one side of > > Rahu- > > > > > > > > ketu axis and consequently half the horoscope stays empty, it > > > > > > > > presents an abnormal distribution of planets. This abnormality > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > not have gone unnoticed by the great astrology Savants, > > > > > > including > > > > > > > > Roopchandra ji. What name was given to this abnormality, or how > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > it understood, or what it was taken to mean could be a matter > > of > > > > > > > > debate. Whatever name we assign to it, it definitely needs our > > > > > > > > attention. We can not ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. > > > > > > > > As you both seem to suggest that this so called Kal Sarp Yog > > has > > > > > > > > been used by unscrupulous astrologers to intimidate gullible > > > > > > > seekers > > > > > > > > and used as a money spinner, then it becomes all the more > > > > > > > imperative > > > > > > > > on our part to bring out the truth such that it explains the > > > > > > > > phenomenon logically. By just saying that it does not exist is > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > wishing some thing away. The phenomenon of all the planets > > > > > > hemmed > > > > > > > > between rahu-ketu does exist, neither of you can deny. Give it > > > > > > > > whatever name you want, but a plausible well reasoned response > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > expected before dumping it into the waste paper basket. > > > > > > > > I am sorry if I have hurt any body's feelings, that has never > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > my intention. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KP Miglani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <%40>, > > > > " Finn Wandahl " > > > > > > > > <finn.wandahl@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. V. Shukla (Lalkitabee), > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please, I mean nothing personal by this. I agree with you > > that > > > > > > > many > > > > > > > > > statements of Lal Kitab has a number of hidden meanings > > hidden > > > > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > them. No doubt about that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I think we should always be very careful that our > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab is not being misused to support something malefic like > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > general peoples fear, which I think is the case here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my honest opinion this whole Kala Sarpa yoga thing should > > be > > > > > > > > > considered to be within the evil circle of Mercury. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > Finn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > careful not to > > > > > > > > > > > <%40>, > > > > " lalkitabee " > > > > > > > > > <lalkitabee@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mr. Wandahl > > > > > > > > > > Yes u r absolutly right, Descriptions of planets are > > usually > > > > > > > > based on > > > > > > > > > > religious cosmology but my explanations are based upon the > > > > > > > > predective & > > > > > > > > > > remedial astrology of lalkitab.This is a reading into the > > > > > > > > text ,to > > > > > > > > > > search out the vision about kalsarp yog in perview of > > > > > > > lalkitab.I > > > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > > > > to answer - does lalkitab includes kalsarp yog directly or > > > > > > > > indirectly? > > > > > > > > > > . & i found it indirect state in lalkitab.(Here i want to > > > > > > say -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the word > > > > > > > > > > KAALSARP has been used as a real snake by some astrologers, > > > > > > In > > > > > > > > fact this > > > > > > > > > > word was used to explain a YOG, like gajkesri YOG, sunafaa > > > > > > > YOG, > > > > > > > > anafaa > > > > > > > > > > YOG, etc. .Here the 1st word KAAL = TIME used as KAAL= > > > > > > HORROR, > > > > > > > > DEATH ,by > > > > > > > > > > some half baked quacksalvers.otherwise there r so much > > > > > > > > horoscopes having > > > > > > > > > > kalsarp yog with a cheerful life.) > > > > > > > > > > Symbolic imaginations are very useful to understand to > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > stream > > > > > > > > > > of predective & remedial astrology while analyzing any > > > > > > > > horoscope.But my > > > > > > > > > > views focused only to the horoscope for the purpose of > > > > > > > > predective or > > > > > > > > > > remedial astrology . Im not trying to prove how are rahu > > > > > > ketu > > > > > > > > explained > > > > > > > > > > astronomically or in other style, bcoz whole lalkitab is > > > > > > based > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > logical predective & logical remedial theory, no other > > > > > > system > > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > found > > > > > > > > > > like this. Otherwise Rahu ketu r accepted as shadow planets > > > > > > > > (CHHAYAA > > > > > > > > > > GRAH)also. I think u wil be agree with my point of > > > > > > view ,what > > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > want to > > > > > > > > > > say.We cant deny symbolic imaginations while reading > > > > > > lalkitab. > > > > > > > > This is > > > > > > > > > > y- in very begining the author of this book Pt. roop Chand > > > > > > > > Joshi ji > > > > > > > > > > adviced this book to read as a noval. > > > > > > > > > > With Regards > > > > > > > > > > Pt.Lalkitabee > > > > > > > > > > V.Shukla > > > > > > > > > > > > <%40>, > > > > " Finn Wandahl " > > > > > > > > > > <finn.wandahl@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. V. Shukla (Lalkitabee), > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Descriptions of planets are usually based on religious > > > > > > > > cosmology, and > > > > > > > > > > > in many religious texts Rahu is pictured as a big snake > > > > > > > > swallowing the > > > > > > > > > > > Sun and causing eclipse to happen. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a matter of fact, than in Varaha Mihira's " Brihat > > > > > > > > Samhita " (6th > > > > > > > > > > > century AD) the very word " Rahu " is used for eclipse and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > word > > > > > > > > > > > " Ketu " is the word for comets and meteors, since comets > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > meteors > > > > > > > > > > > look like tails when observed in the sky. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However there mere fact that Lal Kitab also describes > > Rahu > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > something like this, cannot be used to legitimate " Kala > > > > > > > Sarpa > > > > > > > > Yoga " as > > > > > > > > > > > somehow being linked to Lal Kitab. No way! I think we > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > be honest > > > > > > > > > > > about this - at least to our own good selves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When dealing with the great Lal Kitab, I think we should > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > > > careful to read out of the text, not into the text. > > > > > > > Otherwise > > > > > > > > we may > > > > > > > > > > > end up with some serious misunderstandings. At least this > > > > > > > > happens to > > > > > > > > > > > be my own humble opinion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Finn Wandahl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <%40>, > > > > " lalkitabee " > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitabee@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mr. Wandahl & Members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your keen observations r absolutly right that Nowhere > > any > > > > > > > > > > description > > > > > > > > > > > > with the name as " Kalsarp Yoga " in lalkitab. So we can > > > > > > say > > > > > > > > lalkitab > > > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > > > not consider Kalsarp yoga. But with humble words I want > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > share > > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > own views in this perview..This article was written by > > > > > > me > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > past in > > > > > > > > > > > > other group.I think it will be helpfull to under stand > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > topic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LALKITAB & KAALSARP YOG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RESPECTED MEMBERS lalkitab accepts Rahu as the > > > > > > > > > > > > head of snake & ketu as the tail of snake & saturn is > > > > > > > > elaborated as > > > > > > > > > > > > snake in lalkitab.As example in the very begining of > > > > > > > > lalkitab says > > > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > rahu ketu-- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. EK NE INSAAN KO SIR SE PAKDAA HAI DOOSRE NE PAIR SE. > > > > > > TO > > > > > > > > KHUD BA > > > > > > > > > > > KHUD UNKO JAGAH MIL GAYEE (Means ;- Rahu will be treated > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > head & > > > > > > > > > > > Ketu as tail) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. About saturn - shani khana no 4 addressed as PANI KA > > > > > > > > SAANP, Shani > > > > > > > > > > > > khana no.5 as BACHCHEY KHANE WALAA SAANP, Shani khana > > > > > > no. > > > > > > > 6 > > > > > > > > as RAAT > > > > > > > > > > > KA ANDHAA SAANP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So much use of this word prooves that saturn is called > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > snake in > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now an opinion of mine is that Kalsarp means kal= > > > > > > > > time ,SAMAY Sarp - > > > > > > > > > > > > snake. As defination we can say that the cycle of time > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > which all > > > > > > > > > > > > planets come between Rahu & Ketu in any horoscope will > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > treated as > > > > > > > > > > > > kalsarp yog. It is declared name in Jyotish. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At other side when i saw in lalkitab-- i found some > > > > > > > > discriptions & > > > > > > > > > > > > definations as below > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.PEHLEY GHARON MAIN DUM KETU HOTE ICHCHHAADHAARI SHANI > > > > > > > > HOTAA HO > > > > > > > > > > > > ULAT MAGAR JAB TEVE BAITHA AZDAHAA KHOONI BANTAA HO > > > > > > (here > > > > > > > > ajdahaa is > > > > > > > > > > > > AJGAR SNAKE)SAANP SHANI DUM(tail) KETU GINTEY MUKHDAA > > > > > > > (Head) > > > > > > > > RAHU > > > > > > > > > > > KHUD HOTAA HO (Page no. 585 oroginal book 1952) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.SANICHCHAR KO AGAR SAANP MAANAA JAYE TO USKI DUM KETU > > > > > > > > BAITHAA HONE > > > > > > > > > > > > WALE GHAR MAIN HOGI AUR SIR USKAA RAHU BAITHAA HONE > > WALE > > > > > > > > GHAR MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > GINAA JAYEGAA YA SANICHCHAR KA SIR RAHU HOGAA AUR > > > > > > SANICHCHAR > > > > > > > > KI DUM > > > > > > > > > > > KETU HOGI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (PAGE NO. 588 at no. 5 in the chapter of AAM HAALAT) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Shani ka swabhav is specially counted by RAHU KETU > > in > > > > > > > > lalkitab. > > > > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > > > > > well as at page no. 590 ---MANDI HAALAT MAIN AMOOMAN > > > > > > > > SANICHCHAR > > > > > > > > > > > BAITHAA HONE WALE GHAR KE DONO TARAF HEE DAAYAIN (RIGHT) > > > > > > > > BAAYAIN > > > > > > > > > > > (LEFT) RAHU KETU BAITHAA HONE KE VAQT UNKAA BHEE MANDAA > > > > > > ASAR > > > > > > > > HOGAA. > > > > > > > > > > > > (after this a chart has been written at page 590 > > showing > > > > > > > BAD > > > > > > > > effects > > > > > > > > > > > > of SAANP (Shani) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.At page no. 623 I saw the defination about bad saturn > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > > > > > HEADING:- SANICHCHAR KE MANDE ASAR KA RUKH KIDHAR HOGAA > > > > > > > > > > > > RAHU KO SIR AUR KETU KO DUM (tail) SAMAJHKAR EK SAANP > > > > > > KEE > > > > > > > > SHAKAL > > > > > > > > > > > (shape)BANAYAIN TO RAHU BAITHAA HONE WAALE GHAR SE AAGE > > > > > > > JAHAAN > > > > > > > > KAHIN > > > > > > > > > > > BHI YAANI JIS KHAANE MAIN REKHAA NIKAL KAR SEEDHEE HEE > > JAA > > > > > > > > SAKTEE HO , > > > > > > > > > > > US GHAR PAR SHANI KA ASAR PADEGAA (Here also pandit ji > > > > > > > assumed > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > snake).Even this line has been said for saturn khana 8. > > > > > > But > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > > > context also saturn treated as snake & rahu called as > > head > > > > > > & > > > > > > > > ketu as > > > > > > > > > > > tail. As said above > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :--- SAANP SHANI DUM(tail) KETU GINTEY MUKHDAA (Head) > > > > > > RAHU > > > > > > > > KHUD HOTAA > > > > > > > > > > HO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means we can create a shape of snake in each > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here my only view is that lalkitab already persues Rahu > > > > > > > ketu > > > > > > > > as head > > > > > > > > > > > & tail of Saturn (Snake) & if a horoscope comes befor us > > > > > > > > including all > > > > > > > > > > > planets between Rahu & Ketu ,then as per lalkitab ,a > > > > > > picture > > > > > > > > appears > > > > > > > > > > > that all planets controlled at one side (left or right) > > by > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > snake > > > > > > > > > > > (Saturn) placing his head rahu & tail Ketu. So even > > > > > > lalkitab > > > > > > > > does not > > > > > > > > > > > used the word KALSARP YOG directly.But above said > > > > > > situation > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > planets > > > > > > > > > > > gives us an image of Horoscope as Kal = Time or SAMAY & > > > > > > Sarp > > > > > > > = > > > > > > > > Snake > > > > > > > > > > > Yog,created in horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yaani ki Samay ke ya vaqt ke mutabik sabhi > > > > > > > > > > > > grah saanp ke sir (head) aur dum (Tail) ko paar nahi > > kar > > > > > > > > sake aur ek > > > > > > > > > > > > aisa yog ban baithaa jiskaa naam kalsarp yog ke alawaa > > > > > > aur > > > > > > > > kuchh > > > > > > > > > > bolnaa > > > > > > > > > > > > sateek nahee maaloom hotaa.Bhaley hee laalkitab main > > ise > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > naam se > > > > > > > > > > > > naheen kahaa gayaa hai lekin rahu aur ketu ko to saanp > > > > > > > > (Saturn) ka > > > > > > > > > > sir > > > > > > > > > > > > aur dum kahaa gayaa hai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All this is my view as per understanding of quotes of > > > > > > > revered > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But knowledge & research has no limit.I m owed to all > > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > > > members & there views. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pt.Lalkitabee > > > > > > > > > > > > V.Shukla > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <%40>, > > > > " Finn > > > > > > Wandahl " > > > > > > > > > > > > <finn.wandahl@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Varun Trivedi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kala sarpa Yoga and its opposite, the so called > > " Sweet > > > > > > > > Sarpa > > > > > > > > > > Yoga " , > > > > > > > > > > > > > are by no means ancient. Both these Yogas were > > > > > > > introduced > > > > > > > > by the > > > > > > > > > > late > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hindu astrologer Gopala Krishna Rao (Meena) in his > > > > > > > > book 'Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joytisha', written somewhere in the 1950-ties. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, Mr. Gopala Krishna Rao never mentioned > > > > > > anything > > > > > > > > about an > > > > > > > > > > > > > Upaya for this Yoga. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kalasarpa Yoga is not being mentioned in any of the > > > > > > > > traditional > > > > > > > > > > > > > classics of Hindu astrology. It is also not being > > > > > > > mentioned > > > > > > > > > > anywhere > > > > > > > > > > > > > in our great Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also like to mention that my good friend Mr. K.N. > > > > > > Rao > > > > > > > > from Delhi > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > very critical about Kala Sarpa Yoga, since it has > > been > > > > > > > > misused a > > > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > > > > > to scare the people, very much like the way Mangal- > > > > > > dosha > > > > > > > > and the > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7½-years of Saturn are being used to exploit > > people > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Finn Wandahl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > > > > > > <% > > 40>, > > > > " varun_trvd " > > > > > > > > > > > > > varun_trvd@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Rakesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Go to the files section of the following group. > > Read > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > article > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kal Sarp yog and its upaya. You will know about our > > > > > > > > views on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > > > > > > > > <% > > 40>, > > > > " rakesh.behal " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <rakesh.behal@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i request you all that please discuss > > > > > > KALSARP > > > > > > > > YOG what > > > > > > > > > > lal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kitab > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > says about this and does it really affect a > > person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > waht upayas one can do to get rid of its adverse > > > > > > > > effects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rakesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dr. Shiv Dev Kalsi, > > > Jyotish Rishi (AIFAS) > > > Consultant (Vedic Astrology) > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Shiv Dev Kalsi, > Jyotish Rishi (AIFAS) > Consultant (Vedic Astrology) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.