Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

clarification-mer3

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

resp mr trivedi;

there is mention of only western wall or centre of house

in relation to mer 3 in gutka by yograj prabhakar ji

also there is some impact of 32 teeth in case mer. is manda

in 3rd house in arun samhita 1952. kindly take a look.

could not find southern wall ref of sun articles in mer3

in above pl.

with regards

ghansu

 

, " varun_trvd "

<varun_trvd wrote:

>

> Respected Singh Saheb,

>

> The upaya suggested by the Lal Kitab scholar is a genuine Lal Kitab

> upaya.

>

> Mercury placed in the 3rd house is considered as very bad because it

> not only affects the 3rd house, it also affects the 9th and the 11th

> through aspect. The effect of the mercury in the 3rd spills over to

> the 4th and 5th also. The book says : 9 marte hon, 11 ujade, char,

> panch, teen garakta ho.

>

> The Lal Kitab suggests quite a few upaya for the mercury in the 3rd.

> One of them is makan ki dakshin deewar par lal [ surya ] vastu

> mubarik hogi. This upaya is suggested because budh gina jo teeje

> manda, ravi se darata hai. Thus placing a sun symbol on the south

> wall means establishing the sun in the 3rd house.

>

> This upaya is mentioned in the 1942 edition.

>

> Therefore the suggestion of placing a sun symbol of copper on the

> south wall sounds very logical for the mercury in the 3rd house.

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

, " rpsingh2710 "

> <rpsingh2710@> wrote:

> >

> > Sir,

> >

> > Recently one of my friends with mercury placed in the 3rd house

> has

> > been advised by a well known Lal Kitab scholar from Delhi that he

> > should put on the south wall a copper sun emblem. Sir, is it a Lal

> > Kitab upaya or a vastu upaya ?

> >

> > Respectfully,

> >

> > RP Singh

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " varun_trvd "

> > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Singh saheb,

> > >

> > > Sure, you can ask your question even if it is not related to the

> > > grammar of the Lal Kitab.

> > >

> > > Posting Lal Kitab grammar write ups in the group does not mean

> > that

> > > we have stopped taking up other Lal Kitab concerns.

> > >

> > > Please go ahead with your query.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Varun Trivedi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , " rpsingh2710 "

> > > <rpsingh2710@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Sir,

> > > >

> > > > Can I seek clarification on a point which is not related to

> > > grammar of

> > > > the book? Or we can ask only those questions which are related

> > to

> > > > grammar.

> > > >

> > > > respectfully,

> > > >

> > > > RP Singh

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Respected Ghansu ji,

 

Yes you are right that the teeth count of 32 is also to be seen.

 

I was trying to explain why that Lal Kitab astrolger might have

suggested this upaya. Since the 3rd house represents the south, and

establishing Sun emblem there could keep the mercury in check, the

upaya suggested by that Lal Kitab astrologer sounds logical.

 

I believe the astrologer had picked up the upaya from the Arun

sanhita 1942 ed. There the south wall is mentioned. The original

book mentions only the center or the western wall. But in this

context the south wall also makes sense.

 

Apart from the Lal Kitab angle, it is quite possible that the upaya

suggested by that astrologer might have some Vaastu consideration

also.

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " ghansu108 "

<ghansu108 wrote:

>

> resp mr trivedi;

> there is mention of only western wall or centre of house

> in relation to mer 3 in gutka by yograj prabhakar ji

> also there is some impact of 32 teeth in case mer. is manda

> in 3rd house in arun samhita 1952. kindly take a look.

> could not find southern wall ref of sun articles in mer3

> in above pl.

> with regards

> ghansu

>

> , " varun_trvd "

> <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Singh Saheb,

> >

> > The upaya suggested by the Lal Kitab scholar is a genuine Lal

Kitab

> > upaya.

> >

> > Mercury placed in the 3rd house is considered as very bad

because it

> > not only affects the 3rd house, it also affects the 9th and the

11th

> > through aspect. The effect of the mercury in the 3rd spills over

to

> > the 4th and 5th also. The book says : 9 marte hon, 11 ujade,

char,

> > panch, teen garakta ho.

> >

> > The Lal Kitab suggests quite a few upaya for the mercury in the

3rd.

> > One of them is makan ki dakshin deewar par lal [ surya ] vastu

> > mubarik hogi. This upaya is suggested because budh gina jo teeje

> > manda, ravi se darata hai. Thus placing a sun symbol on the

south

> > wall means establishing the sun in the 3rd house.

> >

> > This upaya is mentioned in the 1942 edition.

> >

> > Therefore the suggestion of placing a sun symbol of copper on

the

> > south wall sounds very logical for the mercury in the 3rd house.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Varun Trivedi

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " rpsingh2710 "

> > <rpsingh2710@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sir,

> > >

> > > Recently one of my friends with mercury placed in the 3rd

house

> > has

> > > been advised by a well known Lal Kitab scholar from Delhi that

he

> > > should put on the south wall a copper sun emblem. Sir, is it a

Lal

> > > Kitab upaya or a vastu upaya ?

> > >

> > > Respectfully,

> > >

> > > RP Singh

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected Singh saheb,

> > > >

> > > > Sure, you can ask your question even if it is not related to

the

> > > > grammar of the Lal Kitab.

> > > >

> > > > Posting Lal Kitab grammar write ups in the group does not

mean

> > > that

> > > > we have stopped taking up other Lal Kitab concerns.

> > > >

> > > > Please go ahead with your query.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Varun Trivedi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " rpsingh2710 "

> > > > <rpsingh2710@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Sir,

> > > > >

> > > > > Can I seek clarification on a point which is not related

to

> > > > grammar of

> > > > > the book? Or we can ask only those questions which are

related

> > > to

> > > > > grammar.

> > > > >

> > > > > respectfully,

> > > > >

> > > > > RP Singh

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...