Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

LK Grammar : Planets....part 1

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Planets :

 

Rasi phal / Grah phal planets

 

When a planet is placed in a house which is not it’s

rasi of exaltation or debility, or is not its pakka

house or is not it’s house according to the Kal

Purush Kundali or exchanges house with some

other planet, then such a planet is called that of

Rasi phal. A Rasi phal planet is always remediable.

 

On the contrary, if a planet is placed in its own rasi,

or rasi of exaltation /debility, or in its own pakka

house, or in its own house according to the Kal

Purush Kundali or in its house of exaltation / debility

according to the Kal Purush Kundali and has not

exchanged place with any other planet, then such

a planet will be considered as that of Grah phal.

A grah phal planet is not remediable. In order to

do the remedy of such a planet, the help of other

planets may have to be taken. Sun is never of

rasi phal, where as moon is always of rasi phal.

 

 

We have already discussed the following 5

types of the planets earlier :

 

[ 1 ] Andhe grah / blind planets : Discussed in the

context of the blind horoscope

 

[ 2 ] Ratandhra grah / night blind planets : Discussed

in the context of half blind horoscope.

 

[ 3 ] Rin Pitri grah / planets denoting ancestral debt :

Discussed in the context of Rin Pitri horoscope

 

[ 4 ] Dharmi grah / pious planets :

Discussed in the context of the pious horoscope.

 

[ 5 ] Naabalig / baalig grah : Discussed in the

context of adolescent and mature horoscopes.

 

Now the other categories of the planets:

 

 

[ 6 ] Saathi grah

 

When the planets exchange their rasi, or rasi

of exaltation /debility or houses of exaltation/debility

according to Kal Purush Kundali, or exchange

their pakka houses, then such planets are called

as saathi grah.

 

For example the 4th house is a pakka ghar of the

Moon and the 9th house is a pkka ghar of Jupiter,

if the moon is placed in the 9th and the Jupiter in

the 4th then both these planets will become saathi

grah.

 

[ 7 ] Muqabile ke grah :

 

When an enemy planet is placed in the jar

[root] of any two friendly planets, the relationship

of friendship gets affected, and such two friendly

planets might become hostile to each other.

 

For example, if a venus is placed in the 6th house

[house of mercury] and the Sun gets placed in the

 

7th house [the jar /root of the venus] then there

could be a hostility between mercury and venus

although both of them are good friends.

 

 

[ 8 ] Qayam grah :

 

A planet is called fully established [ qayam ]

if it has no association with an enemy planet

either through placement or through aspect.

By placement it is meant that such a planet

should not be in rasi of an enemy planet, nor

in the pakka house of an enemy planet, nor in

the house of an enemy according to the Kal

Purush Kundali.

 

Such a fully established planet is considered as

strong and gives full results of the house it is in.

 

[ 9 ] Grah ka ghar:

 

The Rasi which belongs to the planet is called the

grah ka ghar [house of the planet ]. For example

the Gemini and Virgo are the rasi of Mercury; therefore

these two rasi will be called as the mercury ka ghar.

Similarly the 3rd house and the 6th house of the Kal Purush

Kundali will also be known as mercury ka ghar.

 

 

[ 10 ] Ghar ka grah :

 

This simply means the pakka ghar of the planet.

For example the 2nd, 5th, 9th, and 12th are the pakka

ghar of Jupiter, therefore Jupiter will be known as a

ghar ka grah for these houses.

 

 

[ 11 ] Uchcha /neech grah â€" exalted /

debilitated planet

 

It is exactly the same as in traditional vedic

astrology. For example the cancer is the sign of

exaltation for Jupiter while the Capricorn is the

sign of debility. Jupiter in Cancer will be known

as an exalted planet, while in Capricorn it will be

known as in debility.

 

 

Bhooshan Priya

 

Next : Planets contd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear pt. Bhooshan Priya,

 

Your explanation of LK-grammar related to the planets is in fact very

good and right to the point.

 

I do however have a question. In connection to doubtful planets and

Rasi-phal you have given a somewhat strange statement: " The Sun is

never of Rasi-phal, where the Moon is always of Rasi-phal " . I can't

remember ever reading this before. Where exactly did you find this

statement?

 

I hope you will also discuss about 'Equivalent planets'. I have found

these to be very useful for judging friendly and enemical influences,

and also they are used in connection with 'Mahadasa', which I also

hope you will discuss.

 

A number of books have been written about Lal Kitab, but when it comes

to 'Mahadasa' they keep silent or simply repeat LK-1952 almost word by

word. They never give any kind of self experienced information, as if

they never tried it for themselves. However, I have tried 'Mahadasa'

and found it to be very useful, though malefic...

 

 

Best regards,

Finn Wandahl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Finn ji,

 

Pt. Krishna Ashant ji, whom I respect as a learned Lal Kitab scholar,

is of the view that the Sun should always be treated as of Grah phal

and the moon as that of Rasi phal. Other commentators of the book

also have a similar view.

 

I presume [ I said presume ] that it could have been drawn from the

traditional concept where in a kundali the Sun is considered as the

Raja [ king ] and the Moon its Vajeer [ prime minister ]. I believe

that the above inference might have been drawn from the statement :

grah phal ko raja kahen to rasi phal uska saathi vajeer hoga’ -- If

the grah phal is the king then the rasi phal is its companion prime

minister.

 

I have no idea what you mean by equivalent planets, or may be I know

the concept by some other name. However I would request you to do a

small write up, if you can, on the topic for the group.

 

Yes, I will discuss the 35 year dasha cycle [not to be confused with

the 35 years age cycle ] and the way I calculate it. How to calculate

the 35 year dasha system had been a puzzle which has not been solved

as yet. I have my solution for it which I will share with the group.

 

As for the 120 year Vinshottari dasha I go by the Vedic dasha system

because for the Vedic system I have got quite a lot of literature in

Sanskrit to go by. I have found the classical literature on the

vinshottari dasha extremely valuable and useful. I will also explain

why and where I use the 35 year dasha cycle , and why and where I use

the traditional Vedic Vinshottari dasha system.

 

Even otherwise in the horoscopes analyzed and included in the Lal

Kitab, I have not come across any proof of Pt. Rupchand ji having

used either of the two dasha systems namely the 35 year dasha system

or the 120 year dasha system. Had he made some reference to either of

the dasha systems in his analysed horoscopes; it would have been very

easy for us to work out the methodology through reverse engineering.

 

God bless you,

 

Bhooshan Priya

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " Finn Wandahl "

<finn.wandahl wrote:

>

> Dear pt. Bhooshan Priya,

>

> Your explanation of LK-grammar related to the planets is in fact

very

> good and right to the point.

>

> I do however have a question. In connection to doubtful planets and

> Rasi-phal you have given a somewhat strange statement: " The Sun is

> never of Rasi-phal, where the Moon is always of Rasi-phal " . I can't

> remember ever reading this before. Where exactly did you find this

> statement?

>

> I hope you will also discuss about 'Equivalent planets'. I have

found

> these to be very useful for judging friendly and enemical

influences,

> and also they are used in connection with 'Mahadasa', which I also

> hope you will discuss.

>

> A number of books have been written about Lal Kitab, but when it

comes

> to 'Mahadasa' they keep silent or simply repeat LK-1952 almost word

by

> word. They never give any kind of self experienced information, as

if

> they never tried it for themselves. However, I have tried 'Mahadasa'

> and found it to be very useful, though malefic...

>

>

> Best regards,

> Finn Wandahl

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...