Re:Devising the form of an upaya / Shiv Dev Kalsi

[Guest guest]

Dear Shiv Dev Kalsi,

 

Thank you for explaining this.

 

In LK-1952, in the chapter of Two-planet-conjunctions, it is stated

under SUN-MARS that items of Moon like mother etc, becomes badly

affected, but Moon is not destroyed. It is not explained why the Moon

is badly affected, but the explanation involving the Masnooyi-concept

(Artificial planets) seems sound and logical to my ears, since the

Masnooyi-concept, as one of the most fundamental basic elements of

LK-grammar and LK-remedies, cannot possibly be considered subject to

restrictions of application.

 

(By the way, under the same SUN-MARS it is also stated that the Sun

would give exalted results. This could be explained by the simple fact

that Mars rules the exaltation-sign of the Sun, both mutual friends at

the same time)

 

Regarding your statement that Mars-Mercury, when in conjunction, is

the enemy of female planets (Moon & Venus), I have my doubts, as I

think there is more to it than that. Under MARS-MERCURY, the book

itself has no doubt employed the Masnooyi-concept as explanation.

However, it obviously makes a difference if Mars is positive (Sun +

Mercury) or negative (Sun + Saturn), and it also makes a difference if

Mars-Mercury are placed prior to Venus in the chart according to

LK-1952.

 

Best wishes,

Finn Wandahl