LK discussion group Staying on a Second floor / Bhupinder Johar

[Guest guest]

Thank You Varunji.

 

Respectfully,

Bhupinder

--- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

 

>

> Respected Johar ji,

>

> Your makan or dwelling begins at the front entrance

> to your flat,

> east as you have said.

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

,

> bhupinder johar

> <bsjoharsnp wrote:

> >

> > Respected Varunji,

> >

> > Pls allow me to ask one more question - I live on

> 2nd

> > floor. I enter into my house ( gnd floor and 1st

> floor

> > doesn't belong to me) using stairs in south

> direction

> > and after few curves, I enter into my house on 2nd

> > floor from an east facing main door.

> >

> > Now the below mentioned rule should be applied on

> me

> > as per my entry from east door since you've

> mentioned

> > that it matters where the jatak lives.

> >

> > Stairs from south is the common ingress point for

> gnd

> > floor & 1st floor tenants also, hence not

> applicable

> > to me??

> >

> > Pls advise.

> >

> > Respectfully,

> > Bhupinder

> >

> > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > Respected Iqbal ji,

> > >

> > > Briefly summarizing what Pt. Umesh ji has said :

> > >

> > > See page 1130 of the 1952 urdu edition.

> > >

> > > According to the janma Kundali those planets

> which

> > > are posited in

> > > the houses 1 to 9 will demonstrate their effect

> on

> > > the right side as

> > > one enters the house, and those posited from 12

> to

> > > 10 will

> > > demonstrate it on the left side.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Varun Trivedi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ,

> > > punjabilovebug@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Could someone please translate Umesh Ji's

> > > response?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd@>

> > > >

> > > > Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:53:19

> > > >

> > > > LK discussion group Re : Expressing

> > > gratitude to Umesh

> > > Sharma ji

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Respected Sharma ji,

> > > >

> > > > I on my behalf and on the behalf of the

> entire

> > > group convey my

> > > > gratitude to you.Our stand gets vindicated.

> > > >

> > > > We hope that you will keep on finding some

> time

> > > to actively

> > > > participate in the group.

> > > >

> > > > All of us have a lot to learn from scholars

> like

> > > you. let us all

> > > > together solve many such puzzles in the Lal

> > > Kitab.

> > > >

> > > > With Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Varun Trivedi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > <%

> > > 40> @, " Umesh

> Sharma "

> > > > <mudit982001@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Res. Varun ji,

> > > > > Sir, See page no 1130 of 1952 Edition

> > > > > " Teve baithey Ek taa Nauvain, daayain

> dakhila

> > > boltey hain,

> > > > > chaltey chaltey 12 se ghar nau aavain, asar

> > > baayain par dete

> > > > hain "

> > > > > 1. Janamkundli ke anusaar jo grahghar no.1

> se

> > > nau tak baithey

> > > hon

> > > > > vah apna apna parbhav ghar main parvesh

> hote

> > > hue daayain hath

> > > ki

> > > > aur

> > > > > parkat kiya kartey hain tatha ghar no.12 se

> 10

> > > tak bethey hue

> > > > > makaanm ke baayaintaraf apna parbhav

> dikhatain

> > > hey.

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Umesh Sharma

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > <%

> > > 40> @,

> " varun_trvd "

> > > > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Kulbir bhai,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > All Lal kitab readers know that this is

> how

> > > pandit ji wrote.

> > > Had

> > > > > > this not been his style of writing then

> most

> > > of the concepts

> > > > under

> > > > > > the grammar portion would have been

> > > understood by most of us.

> > > > > Giving

> > > > > > my own example, I do not understand even

> 20%

> > > of what is

> > > written

> > > > in

> > > > > > the grammar portion. Now that can not be

> > > because I haven't

> > > got

> > > > the

> > > > > > brains, it is primarily because the style

> of

> > > writing. At

> > > times

> > > > it

> > > > > > appears that Pandit ji was writing in a

> state

> > > of trance and

> > > even

> > > > > he

> > > > > > didn't know what he was writing.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Taking the statement as it appears, we

> have

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

______________________________\

____

You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total

Access, No Cost.

http://tc.deals./tc/blockbuster/text5.com