EXPERINCED NOT PROFESSIONAL- KALSI JI

[Guest guest]

i think; what kalsi ji means to say is that the persons who have

maximum experience of analysing tewas according to lalkitab system

should comment on the issue.

kalsi ji this time it was ur turn to choose the wrong word; the

correct word should have been experience holders not professionals.

 

secondly Profession means a vocation requiring knowledge of some

department of learning.

what a person does to earn his bread and butter should not be our

concern here. our purpose is to share, learn, teach, explore,

lalkitab in this group.

i think u would agree with me that u meant experienced by

professinals.

sincerely

kulbirbance

 

 

, " lalkitabee "

<lalkitabee wrote:

>

> Respected Kalsi Ji

> Im unable to understand that how u consider Bhooshanpriya ji,

kulbir

> ji,Yograj ji & Thakur ji as professionals.Bcoz they never claimed

themselves to be professionals.

> Though as per my experience i want to say that:-

> Rarely I visited to the house of someone for the purpose due to the

> lak of time.

> With regards

> Pt.lalkitabee

>

> , " Shivdev Kalsi "

> <shivdev.kalsi@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Friends,

> >

> > Lalkitabi Ji has raised a crucial query. which statments we shall

> treat as

> > correct. He further

> > emphasized that this is a true outcome of efforts by

professionals.

> > Now here becomes two platforms amateurs like me,

> > varun trivedi, Tyagi Ji, Miglani ji, Nirmal ji and

> > proffessionals like Lalkitabi ji, Bhooshan priya Ji, Umesh

> > Ji,Yograj Ji, Thakur Ji & Kulbir Ji.

> > while reading lalkitab I found important dictum that verification

> must be

> > applied before interpreting the horoscope.

> > Now ball is in the court of professionals.

> > You must be applying these rules before interpreting the

horoscopes.

> > Therefore there will not be any person more suitable to answer

these

> > queries.

> >

> >

> > Regards

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > On 4/3/08, lalkitabee <lalkitabee@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Delhi Naresh

> > > Marvelous Job.Heartiest Congrats from me.

> > > This one is the spirit of a true scholar. aapne ek bojh halkaa

kar

> diya

> > > varnaa log yah hee kehtey ki Pt.Lalkitabee aur varun to bekaar

> main josh

> > > dikhaa rahey hain aur ab lalkitab ko hee galat bol rahey hain.

> Aapki khoj ne

> > > saabit kar diyaa ki aap sahi maayno main lalkitab ka kayee baar

> addhyayan

> > > kar chuke hain. aapki maansiktaa sankuchit nahi hai. Aur shayad

> yah bhi

> > > saabit ho gayaa ki lalkitab main bhi galatiyaan hain aur unhain

> jaise ka

> > > taisaa manjoori de denaa dishaa-bhraamak hee hogaa.Mujhe aur

Varun

> ji ko

> > > Yahi to afsos hai ki jo baar baar kitaab padhne ka aur

samajhne ka dum

> > > bhartey hain unmain se koyee bhi is vishay par nahi bolaa,

dosri

> taraf is

> > > bhed ya galati ko uthaane wala aur solve karne wala dono hee

> professional

> > > astrologers hain. Jinki baat ko hazam karnaa hameshaa hee ek

mudaa

> rahaa

> > > hai. Khair -- ek baar fir se aapko badhaayee aur salaam.

> > > Main ab isi discussion ko aage le jaatey huve yah

vichaar

> > > karne ko boltaa hoon ki -- *AB KIS DEFINATION KO AUTHENTIC

MAANAA

> JAAYE ,

> > > PAGE NO. 206 YA PAGE NO. 1130, kyonki dono hee to orioginal

> hain aur

> > > dono hee ek saath theek nahi ho saktey.koyee ek defination hee

> theek ho

> > > sakti hai. Jabki abhi tak pehley wali defination par hee

vichaar

> hotaa rahaa

> > > hai. Ab to faisla ek tarfaa lenaa hee hogaa.*

> > >

> > > Meri iltazaa hai ki kam se kam ab to ve log

mitthyaa

> bhram ya

> > > abhimaan chhodkar aage aa jaayain aur vastvik taur se addhyayn

> kartey huve

> > > participate karain , aur apne vichaar rakhain. Varnaa bekaar

main gaal

> > > bajaane se kyaa faayada. Yahaan na to koyee mahaagyaani hai na

hee

> > > mahaamoorkh hai,hum sabhi researchers hain.

> > > ANAND -PIDIT kar diyaa aapne AACHARYA UMESH JI.

> > > With Regards

> > > Pt.Lalkitabee

> > > V.Shukla

> > >

> > >

> > > , " Umesh Sharma "

> <mudit982001@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Res. Varun ji,

> > > > Sir, See page no 1130 of 1952 Edition

> > > > " Teve baithey Ek taa Nauvain, daayain dakhila boltey hain,

> > > > chaltey chaltey 12 se ghar nau aavain, asar baayain par dete

hain "

> > > > 1. Janamkundli ke anusaar jo grahghar no.1 se nau tak

baithey hon

> > > > vah apna apna parbhav ghar main parvesh hote hue daayain

hath ki aur

> > > > parkat kiya kartey hain tatha ghar no.12 se 10 tak bethey hue

> > > > makaanm ke baayaintaraf apna parbhav dikhatain hey.

> > > > Regards

> > > > Umesh Sharma

> > > >

> > > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > > varun_trvd@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Kulbir bhai,

> > > > >

> > > > > All Lal kitab readers know that this is how pandit ji

wrote. Had

> > > > > this not been his style of writing then most of the

concepts under

> > > > > the grammar portion would have been understood by most of

us.

> > > > Giving

> > > > > my own example, I do not understand even 20% of what is

written in

> > > > > the grammar portion. Now that can not be because I haven't

got the

> > > > > brains, it is primarily because the style of writing. At

times it

> > > > > appears that Pandit ji was writing in a state of trance

and even

> > > > he

> > > > > didn't know what he was writing.

> > > > >

> > > > > Taking the statement as it appears, we have to decide

whether the

> > > > > word should be daayen or baayen.

> > > > >

> > > > > I think that there is a printing mistake and the word

should be

> > > > > baayen.

> > > > >

> > > > > Have a nice day,

> > > > >

> > > > > Varun

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > , " kulbirbance "

> > > > > <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Varun ji;

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the natural question that is acting like a block is that

pt

> > > > > > ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these

items

> > > > will

> > > > > be

> > > > > > on the right side and these would be on the left side.

why

> did he

> > > > > > explains the items once again while entering and again

when on

> > > > > exit.

> > > > > > why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this

> approach.

> > > > > > don't you think it could have been explained very simple

taking

> > > > > only

> > > > > > one position into account. i.e either take exit route or

> take the

> > > > > > entry route.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sincerely

> > > > > >

> > > > > > kulbirbance.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > > > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected members, The question remains

unanswered. " Isi

> > > > tarah

> > > > > > barah

> > > > > > > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate

huye gine

> > > > ya

> > > > > makan

> > > > > > > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se

12, 11,

> > > > > 10 ke

> > > > > > > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. "

In the

> > > > > above

> > > > > > > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke

saboot

> > > > > > denge. " ? I

> > > > > > > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have

> > > > been 'Baayeen

> > > > > > taraf'

> > > > > > > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> > Dr. Shiv Dev Kalsi,

> > Jyotish Rishi (AIFAS)

> > Consultant (Vedic Astrology)

> >

>