Question finally answered / Kalsi ji

[Guest guest]

Respected Kalsi ji,

 

This is just to put records straight. Pt Bhooshan Priya ji is not a

professional. He is an amateur.

 

The distinction of a professional and an amateur is that a

professional charges fees for consultation where as an amateur

doesn't charge any money, for him it is just a hobby.

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " Shivdev Kalsi "

<shivdev.kalsi wrote:

>

> Dear Friends,

>

> Lalkitabi Ji has raised a crucial query. which statments we shall

treat as

> correct. He further

> emphasized that this is a true outcome of efforts by professionals.

> Now here becomes two platforms amateurs like me,

> varun trivedi, Tyagi Ji, Miglani ji, Nirmal ji and

> proffessionals like Lalkitabi ji, Bhooshan priya Ji, Umesh

> Ji,Yograj Ji, Thakur Ji & Kulbir Ji.

> while reading lalkitab I found important dictum that verification

must be

> applied before interpreting the horoscope.

> Now ball is in the court of professionals.

> You must be applying these rules before interpreting the

horoscopes.

> Therefore there will not be any person more suitable to answer

these

> queries.

>

>

> Regards

>

>

>

>

>

On 4/3/08, lalkitabee <lalkitabee wrote:

> >

> > Respected Delhi Naresh

> > Marvelous Job.Heartiest Congrats from me.

> > This one is the spirit of a true scholar. aapne ek bojh halkaa

kar diya

> > varnaa log yah hee kehtey ki Pt.Lalkitabee aur varun to bekaar

main josh

> > dikhaa rahey hain aur ab lalkitab ko hee galat bol rahey hain.

Aapki khoj ne

> > saabit kar diyaa ki aap sahi maayno main lalkitab ka kayee baar

addhyayan

> > kar chuke hain. aapki maansiktaa sankuchit nahi hai. Aur shayad

yah bhi

> > saabit ho gayaa ki lalkitab main bhi galatiyaan hain aur unhain

jaise ka

> > taisaa manjoori de denaa dishaa-bhraamak hee hogaa.Mujhe aur

Varun ji ko

> > Yahi to afsos hai ki jo baar baar kitaab padhne ka aur samajhne

ka dum

> > bhartey hain unmain se koyee bhi is vishay par nahi bolaa, dosri

taraf is

> > bhed ya galati ko uthaane wala aur solve karne wala dono hee

professional

> > astrologers hain. Jinki baat ko hazam karnaa hameshaa hee ek

mudaa rahaa

> > hai. Khair -- ek baar fir se aapko badhaayee aur salaam.

> > Main ab isi discussion ko aage le jaatey huve yah

vichaar

> > karne ko boltaa hoon ki -- *AB KIS DEFINATION KO AUTHENTIC

MAANAA JAAYE ,

> > PAGE NO. 206 YA PAGE NO. 1130, kyonki dono hee to orioginal

hain aur

> > dono hee ek saath theek nahi ho saktey.koyee ek defination hee

theek ho

> > sakti hai. Jabki abhi tak pehley wali defination par hee vichaar

hotaa rahaa

> > hai. Ab to faisla ek tarfaa lenaa hee hogaa.*

> >

> > Meri iltazaa hai ki kam se kam ab to ve log mitthyaa

bhram ya

> > abhimaan chhodkar aage aa jaayain aur vastvik taur se addhyayn

kartey huve

> > participate karain , aur apne vichaar rakhain. Varnaa bekaar

main gaal

> > bajaane se kyaa faayada. Yahaan na to koyee mahaagyaani hai na

hee

> > mahaamoorkh hai,hum sabhi researchers hain.

> > ANAND -PIDIT kar diyaa aapne AACHARYA UMESH JI.

> > With Regards

> > Pt.Lalkitabee

> > V.Shukla

> >

> >

> > , " Umesh Sharma "

<mudit982001@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Res. Varun ji,

> > > Sir, See page no 1130 of 1952 Edition

> > > " Teve baithey Ek taa Nauvain, daayain dakhila boltey hain,

> > > chaltey chaltey 12 se ghar nau aavain, asar baayain par dete

hain "

> > > 1. Janamkundli ke anusaar jo grahghar no.1 se nau tak baithey

hon

> > > vah apna apna parbhav ghar main parvesh hote hue daayain hath

ki aur

> > > parkat kiya kartey hain tatha ghar no.12 se 10 tak bethey hue

> > > makaanm ke baayaintaraf apna parbhav dikhatain hey.

> > > Regards

> > > Umesh Sharma

> > >

> > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > varun_trvd@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Kulbir bhai,

> > > >

> > > > All Lal kitab readers know that this is how pandit ji wrote.

Had

> > > > this not been his style of writing then most of the concepts

under

> > > > the grammar portion would have been understood by most of us.

> > > Giving

> > > > my own example, I do not understand even 20% of what is

written in

> > > > the grammar portion. Now that can not be because I haven't

got the

> > > > brains, it is primarily because the style of writing. At

times it

> > > > appears that Pandit ji was writing in a state of trance and

even

> > > he

> > > > didn't know what he was writing.

> > > >

> > > > Taking the statement as it appears, we have to decide

whether the

> > > > word should be daayen or baayen.

> > > >

> > > > I think that there is a printing mistake and the word should

be

> > > > baayen.

> > > >

> > > > Have a nice day,

> > > >

> > > > Varun

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " kulbirbance "

> > > > <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Varun ji;

> > > > >

> > > > > the natural question that is acting like a block is that pt

> > > > > ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these

items

> > > will

> > > > be

> > > > > on the right side and these would be on the left side. why

did he

> > > > > explains the items once again while entering and again

when on

> > > > exit.

> > > > > why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this

approach.

> > > > > don't you think it could have been explained very simple

taking

> > > > only

> > > > > one position into account. i.e either take exit route or

take the

> > > > > entry route.

> > > > >

> > > > > sincerely

> > > > >

> > > > > kulbirbance.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected members, The question remains unanswered. " Isi

> > > tarah

> > > > > barah

> > > > > > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye

gine

> > > ya

> > > > makan

> > > > > > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se

12, 11,

> > > > 10 ke

> > > > > > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " In

the

> > > > above

> > > > > > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke

saboot

> > > > > denge. " ? I

> > > > > > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have

> > > been 'Baayeen

> > > > > taraf'

> > > > > > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

>

>

> --

> Dr. Shiv Dev Kalsi,

> Jyotish Rishi (AIFAS)

> Consultant (Vedic Astrology)

>