LK discussion group Re : Expressing gratitude to Umesh Sharma ji

[Guest guest]

Could someone please translate Umesh Ji's response?

 

 

Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

 

 

" varun_trvd " <varun_trvd

 

Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:53:19

 

LK discussion group Re : Expressing gratitude to Umesh Sharma ji

 

 

Respected Sharma ji,

 

I on my behalf and on the behalf of the entire group convey my

gratitude to you.Our stand gets vindicated.

 

We hope that you will keep on finding some time to actively

participate in the group.

 

All of us have a lot to learn from scholars like you. let us all

together solve many such puzzles in the Lal Kitab.

 

With Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

<%40>

@, " Umesh Sharma "

<mudit982001 wrote:

>

> Res. Varun ji,

> Sir, See page no 1130 of 1952 Edition

> " Teve baithey Ek taa Nauvain, daayain dakhila boltey hain,

> chaltey chaltey 12 se ghar nau aavain, asar baayain par dete

hain "

> 1. Janamkundli ke anusaar jo grahghar no.1 se nau tak baithey hon

> vah apna apna parbhav ghar main parvesh hote hue daayain hath ki

aur

> parkat kiya kartey hain tatha ghar no.12 se 10 tak bethey hue

> makaanm ke baayaintaraf apna parbhav dikhatain hey.

> Regards

> Umesh Sharma

>

> <%40>

@, " varun_trvd "

> <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Kulbir bhai,

> >

> > All Lal kitab readers know that this is how pandit ji wrote. Had

> > this not been his style of writing then most of the concepts

under

> > the grammar portion would have been understood by most of us.

> Giving

> > my own example, I do not understand even 20% of what is written

in

> > the grammar portion. Now that can not be because I haven't got

the

> > brains, it is primarily because the style of writing. At times

it

> > appears that Pandit ji was writing in a state of trance and even

> he

> > didn't know what he was writing.

> >

> > Taking the statement as it appears, we have to decide whether

the

> > word should be daayen or baayen.

> >

> > I think that there is a printing mistake and the word should be

> > baayen.

> >

> > Have a nice day,

> >

> > Varun

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > <%40>

@, " kulbirbance "

> > <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Varun ji;

> > >

> > > the natural question that is acting like a block is that pt

> > > ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these items

> will

> > be

> > > on the right side and these would be on the left side. why did

he

> > > explains the items once again while entering and again when on

> > exit.

> > > why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this

approach.

> > > don't you think it could have been explained very simple

taking

> > only

> > > one position into account. i.e either take exit route or take

the

> > > entry route.

> > >

> > > sincerely

> > >

> > > kulbirbance.

> > >

> > >

> > > <%40>

@, " varun_trvd "

> > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected members, The question remains unanswered. " Isi

> tarah

> > > barah

> > > > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye gine

> ya

> > makan

> > > > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se 12,

11,

> > 10 ke

> > > > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " In the

> > above

> > > > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke saboot

> > > denge. " ? I

> > > > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have

> been 'Baayeen

> > > taraf'

> > > > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi

> > > >

> > >

> >

>