Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Question finally answered

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Varun ji;

 

It's double celebration for u rather for the whole group.

 

Firstly the error pointed out by you have been proved.

 

Secondly the purpose of runnig this group has been furthered.

answer to page 206 is connected with page 1130; just imagine how

long would have it taken for a beginner to match the two. if a

veteran who has gone through the book seriously, discloses it, how

much time and energy is saved. also important is if answers are not

found instantly, it gives apprehensions that this book has to be

accepted as such i.e. no logics are applicable.

 

 

you have truly opined that the book seems to have been written in a

trance or hypnotic state of mind. there are no particular strings

to follow. therefore it becomes all the more important to share. pt

ji himself felt this need and advised to read it again and again.

but he never meant that it should be read in seclusion. with the

resources at hand, if members participate with the purpose of

sharing and exploring; this book's logics can be understood and this

book can be established as a logical book. members should

participate without any inhibitions. there can be difference of

opinion but it is the process to resolve to intricacies. sheilding

behind self created myths is harmful. let all be enlightened.

 

congratulations

 

kulbirbance

 

 

 

 

 

, " Umesh Sharma "

<mudit982001 wrote:

>

> Res. Varun ji,

> Sir, See page no 1130 of 1952 Edition

> " Teve baithey Ek taa Nauvain, daayain dakhila boltey hain,

> chaltey chaltey 12 se ghar nau aavain, asar baayain par dete

hain "

> 1. Janamkundli ke anusaar jo grahghar no.1 se nau tak baithey hon

> vah apna apna parbhav ghar main parvesh hote hue daayain hath ki

aur

> parkat kiya kartey hain tatha ghar no.12 se 10 tak bethey hue

> makaanm ke baayaintaraf apna parbhav dikhatain hey.

> Regards

> Umesh Sharma

>

> , " varun_trvd "

> <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Kulbir bhai,

> >

> > All Lal kitab readers know that this is how pandit ji wrote. Had

> > this not been his style of writing then most of the concepts

under

> > the grammar portion would have been understood by most of us.

> Giving

> > my own example, I do not understand even 20% of what is written

in

> > the grammar portion. Now that can not be because I haven't got

the

> > brains, it is primarily because the style of writing. At times

it

> > appears that Pandit ji was writing in a state of trance and even

> he

> > didn't know what he was writing.

> >

> > Taking the statement as it appears, we have to decide whether

the

> > word should be daayen or baayen.

> >

> > I think that there is a printing mistake and the word should be

> > baayen.

> >

> > Have a nice day,

> >

> > Varun

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " kulbirbance "

> > <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Varun ji;

> > >

> > > the natural question that is acting like a block is that pt

> > > ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these items

> will

> > be

> > > on the right side and these would be on the left side. why did

he

> > > explains the items once again while entering and again when on

> > exit.

> > > why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this

approach.

> > > don't you think it could have been explained very simple

taking

> > only

> > > one position into account. i.e either take exit route or take

the

> > > entry route.

> > >

> > > sincerely

> > >

> > > kulbirbance.

> > >

> > >

> > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected members, The question remains unanswered. " Isi

> tarah

> > > barah

> > > > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye gine

> ya

> > makan

> > > > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se 12,

11,

> > 10 ke

> > > > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " In the

> > above

> > > > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke saboot

> > > denge. " ? I

> > > > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have

> been 'Baayeen

> > > taraf'

> > > > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...