Guest guest Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Respected members, The question remains unanswered. "Isi tarah barah number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye gine ya makan mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se 12, 11, 10 ke gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge." In the above passage how can the planets "daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge." ? I believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have been 'Baayeen taraf' Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Varun ji; the natural question that is acting like a block is that pt ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these items will be on the right side and these would be on the left side. why did he explains the items once again while entering and again when on exit. why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this approach. don't you think it could have been explained very simple taking only one position into account. i.e either take exit route or take the entry route. sincerely kulbirbance. , " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd wrote: > > Respected members, The question remains unanswered. " Isi tarah barah > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye gine ya makan > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se 12, 11, 10 ke > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " In the above > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " ? I > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have been 'Baayeen taraf' > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Dear Kulbir bhai, All Lal kitab readers know that this is how pandit ji wrote. Had this not been his style of writing then most of the concepts under the grammar portion would have been understood by most of us. Giving my own example, I do not understand even 20% of what is written in the grammar portion. Now that can not be because I haven't got the brains, it is primarily because the style of writing. At times it appears that Pandit ji was writing in a state of trance and even he didn't know what he was writing. Taking the statement as it appears, we have to decide whether the word should be daayen or baayen. I think that there is a printing mistake and the word should be baayen. Have a nice day, Varun , " kulbirbance " <kulbirbance wrote: > > Varun ji; > > the natural question that is acting like a block is that pt > ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these items will be > on the right side and these would be on the left side. why did he > explains the items once again while entering and again when on exit. > why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this approach. > don't you think it could have been explained very simple taking only > one position into account. i.e either take exit route or take the > entry route. > > sincerely > > kulbirbance. > > > , " varun_trvd " > <varun_trvd@> wrote: > > > > Respected members, The question remains unanswered. " Isi tarah > barah > > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye gine ya makan > > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se 12, 11, 10 ke > > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " In the above > > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke saboot > denge. " ? I > > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have been 'Baayeen > taraf' > > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Res. Varun ji, Sir, See page no 1130 of 1952 Edition " Teve baithey Ek taa Nauvain, daayain dakhila boltey hain, chaltey chaltey 12 se ghar nau aavain, asar baayain par dete hain " 1. Janamkundli ke anusaar jo grahghar no.1 se nau tak baithey hon vah apna apna parbhav ghar main parvesh hote hue daayain hath ki aur parkat kiya kartey hain tatha ghar no.12 se 10 tak bethey hue makaanm ke baayaintaraf apna parbhav dikhatain hey. Regards Umesh Sharma , " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd wrote: > > Dear Kulbir bhai, > > All Lal kitab readers know that this is how pandit ji wrote. Had > this not been his style of writing then most of the concepts under > the grammar portion would have been understood by most of us. Giving > my own example, I do not understand even 20% of what is written in > the grammar portion. Now that can not be because I haven't got the > brains, it is primarily because the style of writing. At times it > appears that Pandit ji was writing in a state of trance and even he > didn't know what he was writing. > > Taking the statement as it appears, we have to decide whether the > word should be daayen or baayen. > > I think that there is a printing mistake and the word should be > baayen. > > Have a nice day, > > Varun > > , " kulbirbance " > <kulbirbance@> wrote: > > > > Varun ji; > > > > the natural question that is acting like a block is that pt > > ji could have simply said; when u enter the house these items will > be > > on the right side and these would be on the left side. why did he > > explains the items once again while entering and again when on > exit. > > why did he made it complex.? what was the need for this approach. > > don't you think it could have been explained very simple taking > only > > one position into account. i.e either take exit route or take the > > entry route. > > > > sincerely > > > > kulbirbance. > > > > > > , " varun_trvd " > > <varun_trvd@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected members, The question remains unanswered. " Isi tarah > > barah > > > number khane se apane aap ko khana 9 ki taraf aate huye gine ya > makan > > > mein bahar se aakar dakhil hone lagen to khana # 12 se 12, 11, > 10 ke > > > gharon ke grah daayeen taraf makan ke saboot denge. " In the > above > > > passage how can the planets " daayeen taraf makan ke saboot > > denge. " ? I > > > believe daayeen taraf is a mistake. It should have been 'Baayeen > > taraf' > > > Need your views on this. With regards, Varun Trivedi > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.