1941 Gutka : Contradiction ? a few facts / varun ji

[Guest guest]

Varun ji; then also the basic question remains.1. IS LINE NO 14 PAGE 283 IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LINE NO 1 ALSO MARKED AS SUBTITLE ON THE SAME PAGE. i.e. can sun or moon aspect from 10 to 4th house.

sincerely

kulbirbance

On 3/29/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Respected Girish ji,What you have said makes a part sense. It is the statement " nihayat purdard maut hove " that is what I am uncomfortable about. With Saturn+ Venus in the 4th and the Moon in the 10th [ replacing

moon for the sun] how could that lead to a 'nihayat purdard maut'.But if the statement of the book for Moon in the 10th : " vaid dhanvatari saath chahe hote, maut pani se hoti ho " is taken to mean 'nihayat purdard maut' then what you have suggested

derserves a serious consideration.Let us hear from other scholars also.Regards,Varun Trivedi , " girish_raheja "

<girish_raheja wrote:>> Respected Varun ji,> > Could it be Moon in place of the Sun?> > One thing is absolutely certain that the nature of results listed > for this combination can not be given for a Varshphal kundali. The

> long term results, as they are, indicate that the combination is for > the Janma Kundali.> > Since in a Janma Kundali this combination is not possible with Sun > as one of the planets, have you given a thought to the idea that

> Moon could be the planet in place of the Sun.> > I suggest Moon because of two indicators in the results; it talks > about the lambi umra and jaydad. Both these things could be > associated with Moon and not the Sun.

> > Faithfully,> > Girish Raheja> > > > > > > > > > > , " varun_trvd "

> <varun_trvd@> wrote:> >> > > > Respected members,> > > > > > > > A few facts which you could keep in mind while assessing the > problem of

> > contradiction.> > > > > > > > Fact 1 :> > > > > > > > Venus + Saturn aspecting the Sun or the Sun aspecting this > combination

> > can never occur in a Janma Kundali.> > > > > > > > Venus can not be 180 degrees away from the Sun. Venus can not be > more> > than 49 degrees away from the Sun. This is an astronomical truth

> and can> > not be changed.> > > > > > > > Therefore, the results accruing for this situation can never > happen , as> > far as the Janma Kundali is concerned.

> > > > > > > > Fact 2 :> > > > > > > > This situation of Venus + Saturn under the aspect of the Sun or > visa> > versa can occur only in a Varsh Phal kundali.

> > > > > > > > It will not be prudent to declare a painful death to the native > simply> > because the combinations in this situation happen to occur in any> > particular year. Varsh Phal kundali, meant for a particular

year, > should> > not be used to declare results which are spread all through the > life.> > > > > > > > Fact 3 :> > > > > >

> > This situation can occur in a Kundali cast with the help of the > Palm> > print.> > > > > > > > In this condition we have to keep in mind whether to give

credence > to> > the Janma Kundali cast scientifically based on the birth data, or a> > kundali cast with the help of the palm print.> > > > In my opinion the kundali based on the features on the palm can

at > the> > most be used to verify the Janma kundali. For predictions and > suggesting> > upaya it is the scientifically cast Janma kundali which should be > used.> > Even otherwise how many Lal Kitab scholars are proficient in

> preparing a> > kundali with the help of the palm print.> > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > Varun Trivedi> >>