Lal Kitab and its tragedy

[Guest guest]

Respected members,

 

 

This is the tragedy; raise a fundamental astrological issue and all

those who claim to have studied the Lal Kitab for decades go silent.

If I had raised a peripheral question there would have been at least

half a dozen people participating in an agitated debate.

 

Go to the archives and you will find long debates on issues like

whether the steel ring should be open at the ends or closed, or

whether keeping a square piece of silver for Saturn is just to find

out the nature of the Saturn or it is also a part of the upaya and

so on.

 

Or talk about any myth or a legend about the book, and you find

every body ready with a myth of their own. Every body claiming to be

very close to Pandit ji; they would go at great lengths to describe

what he wore, how he walked, how the spirits dictated the book to

him and so on. But when it comes to breaking some astrological

misconceptions surrounding this book, none of them is to be seen.

 

On this current issue under discussion except for Kulbir ji and

Raheja ji, no body has come out with any comments either way.

 

It is this apathy to discuss the Lal Kitab and its contents purely

with an astrological perspective, which has lead other astrologers

to be vary of it. No wonder that they consider this book as a book

of Tona-Totkas and the Lal Kitab astrologers as semi-literate small

time village pundits. I do not blame others for this misconception.

We are at fault. It is our own apathy responsible for it because we

lack confidence to argue out issues on their astrological merits.

 

Well, doesn’t matter; our effort is to get the rightful place this

book deserves in the world of Indian Astrology. Participation or no

participation we will continue with our effort.

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

[Guest guest]

Gurudev; remember the last line of this book is MADAD MALIK APNI DEGA, NEKI KHUD KARTE RAHO.

baki KUCH TO MAJBURIYAN RAHIN HONGI; YOUNH HI KOI BEWAFA NAHIN HOTA,

pehli majboori; logon ko yeh shaq paida na ho jai ki mujhe lalkitab ki samajh nahin.

second; why to comment i.e. accept, deny or improve upon a point which we ourselves couldn't point out. bhai hamse badhkar kaun;

please try to understand their difficulty they have apprehensions

1. their lalkitab commerce will suffer.

2. it is difficult to acept that one has been associated with this book for years; but all gone waste; all of sudden comes a bolt that his approach was wrong; how to undo that. its hard to accept unless antarman ka shudikaran ho gaya jai.

3. thier goodwill and chele chapte/ following will run away.

so it is convenient to turn a blind eye.

jab pt ji ne shuru me hi likh diya DUNIYAVI HISAB KITAB HAI , KOI DAWA-E-KHUDAI NAHIN. then what's wrong in reviewing and discussing. rome was not built in a day, we all can become masters but patience and integrity is a vital ingredient.

sincerely

kulbirbance

On 3/29/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

 

 

 

 

Respected members,This is the tragedy; raise a fundamental astrological issue and all those who claim to have studied the Lal Kitab for decades go silent. If I had raised a peripheral question there would have been at least

half a dozen people participating in an agitated debate. Go to the archives and you will find long debates on issues like whether the steel ring should be open at the ends or closed, or whether keeping a square piece of silver for Saturn is just to find

out the nature of the Saturn or it is also a part of the upaya and so on.Or talk about any myth or a legend about the book, and you find every body ready with a myth of their own. Every body claiming to be

very close to Pandit ji; they would go at great lengths to describe what he wore, how he walked, how the spirits dictated the book to him and so on. But when it comes to breaking some astrological misconceptions surrounding this book, none of them is to be seen.

On this current issue under discussion except for Kulbir ji and Raheja ji, no body has come out with any comments either way.It is this apathy to discuss the Lal Kitab and its contents purely with an astrological perspective, which has lead other astrologers

to be vary of it. No wonder that they consider this book as a book of Tona-Totkas and the Lal Kitab astrologers as semi-literate small time village pundits. I do not blame others for this misconception. We are at fault. It is our own apathy responsible for it because we

lack confidence to argue out issues on their astrological merits.Well, doesn't matter; our effort is to get the rightful place this book deserves in the world of Indian Astrology. Participation or no participation we will continue with our effort.

Regards,Varun Trivedi