1941 Gutka : Contradictions ?

[Guest guest]

Dear Kulbir bhai,

 

I have quoted these lines from the urdu edition. Prabhakar ji has

not added or dropped any word.

 

Regards.

 

varun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " kulbir bance "

<kulbirbance wrote:

>

> gurudev; khana no. shukar shanichar dono khanna no 4 aur suraj

khanna no 10.

> khanna no 10 ka suraj khanna no 4 ke grahon ko kaise dekhega. lk

aspects;

> line 9-10 dono no10 suraj 4; yani 1-2 ke anusar dono ko suraj

> dekhe.parphaladesh me kitni badi contradiction. ARTH KA ANARTH

> bhai ji kahin printing me gadbad hai;

> line no 14 page 283 aur line 9-10 page no 284 me adla badli ho

gayi.

> main to kab se kah raha hun misprints or wrong words insertion ho

sakte hai

> par manata hi koi nahin.

> sincerely

> kulbirbance

>

>

>

> On 3/27/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

> >

> > Respected members,

> >

> >

> >

> > Do you think that there are contradictions in the following

statements

> > made in the 1941 gutka ?

> >

> >

> >

> > The context is combination of Saturn + Venus:

> >

> >

> >

> > *Statement 1*

> >

> >

> >

> > Page 283 lines 1-2 says,

> >

> >

> >

> > *Dono ko sooraj dekhe* :

> >

> > sanichar ka purjor bura asar, maut purdard hogi

> >

> >

> >

> > *Statement 2*

> >

> >

> >

> > Page 284 lines 9-12 says

> >

> >

> >

> > *Dono # 10 aur sooraj # 4* :

> >

> >

> >

> > sanichar ka bura asar na hoga balki jaydad banegi . maut bhi

purdard na

> > hogi, balki lambi umra hogi, naqad rupia paisa beshak kam hi

hove.

> >

> >

> >

> > * statement 2 mein bhi sooraj dono ko dekh raha hai. Don't you

think

> > statement 1 and statement 2 are in contradiction with one

another? *

> >

> >

> >

> > The Gutka further says

> >

> >

> >

> > *Statement 3*

> >

> >

> >

> > Page 283/4 lines 13-15+

> >

> >

> >

> > *Dono # 4 aur suraj #10 : *

> >

> >

> >

> > nihayat purdard maut hove, nihayat kareebi ristedar karobar mein

shamil

> > hokar ya vaise hi uska dhan kha pee jayenge.

> >

> >

> >

> > *Although it is the otherway round and still talking of 'purdard

maut'. *

> >

> > *Does it mean irrespective of the fact whether the sun aspects

this

> > combination or this combination aspects the sun 'nihayat

purdard maut' is

> > certain?*

> >

> > **

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> >

> >

> > Varun Trivedi

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>