LK discussion group 1941 Gutka : Contradictions ?

[Guest guest]

gurudev; khana no. shukar shanichar dono khanna no 4 aur suraj khanna no 10.

khanna no 10 ka suraj khanna no 4 ke grahon ko kaise dekhega. lk aspects;

line 9-10 dono no10 suraj 4; yani 1-2 ke anusar dono ko suraj dekhe.par phaladesh me kitni badi contradiction. ARTH KA ANARTH

bhai ji kahin printing me gadbad hai;

line no 14 page 283 aur line 9-10 page no 284 me adla badli ho gayi.

main to kab se kah raha hun misprints or wrong words insertion ho sakte hai par manata hi koi nahin.

sincerely

kulbirbance

 

On 3/27/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respected members,

 

Do you think that there are contradictions in the following statements made in the 1941 gutka ?

 

The context is combination of Saturn + Venus:

 

Statement 1

 

Page 283 lines 1-2 says,

 

Dono ko sooraj dekhe :

sanichar ka purjor bura asar, maut purdard hogi

 

Statement 2

 

Page 284 lines 9-12 says

 

Dono # 10 aur sooraj # 4 :

 

sanichar ka bura asar na hoga balki jaydad banegi . maut bhi purdard na hogi, balki lambi umra hogi, naqad rupia paisa beshak kam hi hove.

 

statement 2 mein bhi sooraj dono ko dekh raha hai. Don't you think statement 1 and statement 2 are in contradiction with one another?

 

The Gutka further says

 

Statement 3

 

Page 283/4 lines 13-15+

 

Dono # 4 aur suraj #10 :

 

nihayat purdard maut hove, nihayat kareebi ristedar karobar mein shamil hokar ya vaise hi uska dhan kha pee jayenge.

 

Although it is the otherway round and still talking of 'purdard maut'.

Does it mean irrespective of the fact whether the sun aspects this combination or this combination aspects the sun 'nihayat purdard maut' is certain?

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi