Guest guest Posted March 27, 2008 Report Share Posted March 27, 2008 Respected members, Do you think that there are contradictions in the following statements made in the 1941 gutka ? The context is combination of Saturn + Venus: Statement 1 Page 283 lines 1-2 says, Dono ko sooraj dekhe : sanichar ka purjor bura asar, maut purdard hogi Statement 2 Page 284 lines 9-12 says Dono # 10 aur sooraj # 4 : sanichar ka bura asar na hoga balki jaydad banegi . maut bhi purdard na hogi, balki lambi umra hogi, naqad rupia paisa beshak kam hi hove. statement 2 mein bhi sooraj dono ko dekh raha hai. Don’t you think statement 1 and statement 2 are in contradiction with one another? The Gutka further says Statement 3 Page 283/4 lines 13-15+ Dono # 4 aur suraj #10 : nihayat purdard maut hove, nihayat kareebi ristedar karobar mein shamil hokar ya vaise hi uska dhan kha pee jayenge. Although it is the otherway round and still talking of 'purdard maut'. Does it mean irrespective of the fact whether the sun aspects this combination or this combination aspects the sun 'nihayat purdard maut' is certain? Regards, Varun Trivedi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.