LK discussion group The books I have / Vinayji

[Guest guest]

Respected Vinayji,

 

Book is " Lalkitab - Prashtbhoomi and Vyakhayya " by Pt

Krishan Ashant ( I think I am very close to have it

right).

 

Regards

Bhupinder

--- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

 

> Respected Vinay ji,

>

> That is an excellent collection of good books. I

> would suggest that

> you also read Pt. Krishna Ashant ji's book. That

> book will give you

> a right perspective into the Lal Kitab.

>

> I would further request you to keep posting small

> informative write

> ups for the group; any thing you would like to share

> with all of us.

> While reading the book certain things strike us,

> share with the

> group all such things.

>

> Join our collective effort to enrich the

> understanding of the Lal

> Kitab.

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

>

, " Vinay

> kumar "

> <v4vedic wrote:

> >

> > Respected Varun Ji,

> > Presently I have Arun Sanhita, Lalkitab

> Gyaneshwari Teeka by

> published

> > by Manoj Pocket Books and Gutka by prabhakar jee

> and Two books of

> Goswami

> > Ji of 1939 and

> > 1941,all in Hindi. I also downloaded the 1952

> Hindi three volumes

> by

> > Chandershekhar

> > of Ambala and 1942 By Puskarma .

> > I started Learning Urdu and may start reading Urdu

> Books shortly.

> > Though I am familiar with the books but not so

> learned like others

> in group.

> > Regards

> > Vinay

> >

> > On 3/25/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Vinay ji,

> > >

> > > Would you kindly tell me which Lal Kitab

> editions have you read?

> > > Which Lal Kitab books you already have with you

> in your personal

> > > library?

> > >

> > > I am seeking this information because what ever

> is being

> discussed

> > > here will be meaningful for only those who have

> a very good back

> > > ground of the Lal Kitab.This group is not meant

> for long distance

> > > learning of the Lal Kitab.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Varun Trivedi

> > >

> > > --- In

>

<%

> 40>,

> > > " Vinay kumar "

> > > <v4vedic@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respacted Varun Ji,

> > > >

> > > > You are right. 5th house is south western

> direction where sun

> is

> > > considered

> > > > weks because sun sets in west.

> > > > But why the Saturn is manda. because sun is

> not aspecting

> > > > saturn. and why ketu is also manda whereas he

> is not in the

> > > picture at all.

> > > > please guide

> > > >

> > > > Thanks in advance

> > > >

> > > > Vinay

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 3/25/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected Iqbal ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Saturn placed in the 3rd will have aspect on

> the 5th house.

> Thus

> > > the

> > > > > Saturn is going to adversely affect the Sun

> and will also get

> > > affected in

> > > > > the process. The book says:

> > > > >

> > > > > *5 ravi se ketu manda, umda shani na hota

> ho*

> > > > >

> > > > > " ketu nar santaan aur khud shani ka prabhav

> manda hoga "

> > > > >

> > > > > It will get worse if you live in a house

> facing east. The

> > > adverse effect

> > > > > on the Sun, though not mentioned in the

> book, will also be

> > > perceptible

> > > > > through the conflict with rajya prashashan [

> state authority]

> > > represented by

> > > > > the Sun. It will also be perceived through

> the significations

> > > of the house

> > > > > the Sun has its lordship on.

> > > > >

> > > > > The significations of the houses whose

> lordship is of the

> Saturn

> > > may not

> > > > > be fully realised since it will act manda.

> > > > >

> > > > > Although not much, but even the

> significations of Mars could

> be

> > > affected.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Varun Trivedi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In

>

<%

> 40>,

> > > punjabilovebug@

> > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Varun Ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > How about the Saturn in 3rd with

> Sun/Mars/Mercury in 5th.

> How

> > > would this

> > > > > similar logic play out insofar as Saturn/Sun

> relationship?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Best Regards,

> > > > > > Iqbal

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > " kulbirbance " kulbirbance@

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:20:05

> > > > > >

>

<%

> 40>

> > > > > > LK discussion group Re: saturn in

> 12

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

______________________________\

____

Be a better friend, newshound, and

know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

[Guest guest]

Bhai Vinay ji,Aap ke paas jo kitabein hain un mein se sirf chandigarh waali kitab theek hai jis mein kee kaafi kucch urdu ki 1952 waali lalkitab se milta hai. Baaqi sabhi kitabein kisi naa kisi aadmi kee likhi huyi hain jinhoney aapni taraf se samjhaaney kee koshish kee hai. aap naye hai is liye agar aap izazat dein to mein aapko ko batana chahta hoon kee jab taq aap paanchon ke paanchon lalkitabein naa padh lein, koyi bhee teekey waali kitab naa padheyn.

warna ghodey kee ankhon mein hara chashma lag jaayega aur usay sookhi ghaas bhee hari nazar aaney lag jayegi.rahi baat Pandit Krsihan ashaant waali kitaab ki, Bhayi abhi aap is kitab ko naa padhein to achha hai. Is kitab ke lekhak ney Likheny kee bahut achhi koshish kee hai per kayi jagah per wo lalkitab se bahar kee cheejain likh gaya hai. Is lekhak ney 1939 aur 1940 waali kitabein padhey bagair hee is kitab ko likh diya . Jis se kuchh baatein galat likhi gayi aur jinhoney bhee us kitaab ko urdu waali kitab padhney se pehley padha wo shuru shuru mein bahut ulajhey hongein. Aap is kitaab ko padhnaa zaroor magar Poori paanch kitaaben padhney ke baad.

Is lekhak ne pehli baarlalkitab per bahut khul kar likha hai.Meri shubh ichhaayein aap ke ssath hain. Zorlaga ker padheyn.Aapka Iqbal Chand Thakur On 3/27/08, bhupinder johar <bsjoharsnp wrote:

 

Respected Vinayji, Book is " Lalkitab - Prashtbhoomi and Vyakhayya " by Pt Krishan Ashant ( I think I am very close to have it right). Regards Bhupinder

--- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > Respected Vinay ji, > > That is an excellent collection of good books. I

> would suggest that > you also read Pt. Krishna Ashant ji's book. That > book will give you > a right perspective into the Lal Kitab. > > I would further request you to keep posting small

> informative write > ups for the group; any thing you would like to share > with all of us. > While reading the book certain things strike us, > share with the > group all such things.

> > Join our collective effort to enrich the > understanding of the Lal > Kitab. > > Regards, > > Varun Trivedi > > > > >

> > > > > , " Vinay

> kumar " > <v4vedic wrote: > > > > Respected Varun Ji, > > Presently I have Arun Sanhita, Lalkitab > Gyaneshwari Teeka by > published > > by Manoj Pocket Books and Gutka by prabhakar jee

> and Two books of > Goswami > > Ji of 1939 and > > 1941,all in Hindi. I also downloaded the 1952 > Hindi three volumes > by > > Chandershekhar > > of Ambala and 1942 By Puskarma .

> > I started Learning Urdu and may start reading Urdu > Books shortly. > > Though I am familiar with the books but not so > learned like others > in group. > > Regards

> > Vinay > > > > On 3/25/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > > > > Respected Vinay ji, > > > > > > Would you kindly tell me which Lal Kitab

> editions have you read? > > > Which Lal Kitab books you already have with you > in your personal > > > library? > > > > > > I am seeking this information because what ever

> is being > discussed > > > here will be meaningful for only those who have > a very good back > > > ground of the Lal Kitab.This group is not meant > for long distance

> > > learning of the Lal Kitab. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > <%

> 40>, > > > " Vinay kumar " > > > <v4vedic@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > Respacted Varun Ji, > > > > > > > > You are right. 5th house is south western > direction where sun > is > > > considered

> > > > weks because sun sets in west. > > > > But why the Saturn is manda. because sun is > not aspecting > > > > saturn. and why ketu is also manda whereas he > is not in the

> > > picture at all. > > > > please guide > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > > Vinay > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > On 3/25/08, varun_trvd <varun_trvd@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Iqbal ji,

> > > > > > > > > > Saturn placed in the 3rd will have aspect on > the 5th house. > Thus > > > the > > > > > Saturn is going to adversely affect the Sun

> and will also get > > > affected in > > > > > the process. The book says: > > > > > > > > > > *5 ravi se ketu manda, umda shani na hota > ho*

> > > > > > > > > > " ketu nar santaan aur khud shani ka prabhav > manda hoga " > > > > > > > > > > It will get worse if you live in a house

> facing east. The > > > adverse effect > > > > > on the Sun, though not mentioned in the > book, will also be > > > perceptible > > > > > through the conflict with rajya prashashan [

> state authority] > > > represented by > > > > > the Sun. It will also be perceived through > the significations > > > of the house > > > > > the Sun has its lordship on.

> > > > > > > > > > The significations of the houses whose > lordship is of the > Saturn > > > may not > > > > > be fully realised since it will act manda.

> > > > > > > > > > Although not much, but even the > significations of Mars could > be > > > affected. > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <%

> 40>, > > > punjabilovebug@ > > > wrote: > > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Varun Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > How about the Saturn in 3rd with > Sun/Mars/Mercury in 5th. > How > > > would this

> > > > > similar logic play out insofar as Saturn/Sun > relationship? > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Iqbal > > > > > >

> > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " kulbirbance " kulbirbance@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:20:05 > > > > > > > <%

> 40> > > > > > > LK discussion group Re: saturn in > 12

=== message truncated === ________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ