A suggestion :- about correction of reading errors / Kulbir ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Kulbi Bhai,

 

The word `gar van' might have been used in the book hundreds of

times. The question under discussion is that in the line whether the

word ` gar van' makes logical sense in terms of meaning and also in

terms of the language rules.

 

In my previous messages I have tried to explain that the last

segment of the line has been separated through a dash. If the words

are to be read as `gar van' meaning `if there is' then it becomes a

verb segment which can not be or should not have been separated by a

dash. Since a dash appears before this segment which means that it

is the fourth entity like the previous three enumerated earlier.

 

Now have a look at these lines explaining `gard' as a karak of

Venus :

 

1952 ed, page 826 line # 10

 

" bareek urane wali zarra zarra hoti huyee mitti ko shukra ….kahte

hain "

 

Exactly the same lines appear on page 289 line # 5 of the 1942

edition.

 

Now if the description above doesn't mean `gard' then what else does

it mean? Can you find a better way to describe `gard'?

 

Therefore I once again reiterate my view that in the context of the

Venus the fourth segment has to be read ` gardaa(n) ho' and no other

way.

 

I do not insist that others agree to what I have said. It is for

them to make up their own minds. If they insist that it should be

read as `gar van ho' then let them, I have no dispute. As far as we

are concerned we continue to read and interpret it as ` gardaa(n) ho'

 

Have a nice day

 

Varun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " kulbir bance "

<kulbirbance wrote:

>

> Varun ji ,

>

> page 117 line of gutka is GAR VAN KUAN NA HO.... LINE2 PAGE 107

HAS TAH HI KACHI GAR VAN HO. If both gar van are the same then

garadan is not correct it has to be gar van, meaning existing at

that place. please reconfirm

>

> sincerely

>

> kulbirbance

>

>

>

>

> Yes, Varun ji; after deliberating upon the issue i think i have no

option but to agree with u absolutely on the issue that it is DEEWAR

KACHI, MITTI KACHI, TAH HI KACHI, GARDaaN HO. BCOZ

> firstly no mention of any direction or specific place is there in

these lines or as a matter of factin this whole topic subhead shukkr

10 in gutka. if it is garvan ho then naturaly the question that

automatically crops up is Where?

> secondly these four items 1. wall of mud(clay), 2. mud, 3. ground

surface occupied by mud or uncemented,4 Dust seem perfectly in

accordance as shay of venus corresponding to house no 10.

> thanks and regards;

>

> kulbirbance

>