LK discussion group A suggestion :- about correction of reading errors to Yograj Ji

[Guest guest]

Mahajan ji, there is no doubt on the issue that gar means agar IF and ghar means rahaish House. at various places pakka ghar and ghar as such been mentioned to denote residence. GaR VAn can only mean " If existing at that place. " we cannot take VAn at par with vaan as meaning beholder/possessor like putarvaan, rathvaan, bhagyavaan, balvaan etc.

kulbirbance

On 3/11/08, mts3434 <mts3434 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Sir,aap kis chakar mein ulajh gaye kyon urdu ke liye sirkhapai kar rahe ho? abb agar hindi mein dekhen to kyon nahi ye keh sakte ki ghar vaan ( jaise puttar-vaan ) matlab ki agar ghar ke west deewar kachi ho to ghar-vaan zyada ghar ( makan ) honge. kyonki makan ko hum aaj bhee ghar boltey hain.

mahajan , Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar wrote:

>> Dear Vipin Bhai> > I thank you very much for your concern and the faith you have shown in me. I will rectify every possible mistakes from the book and will upload a Darustee-namaa as soon as possible. I request every mate

including you to point out such errors. > > Kulbir Bhai, I confess and confirm that the correct word in question is " Taiy " not " Na " I agree with you that this particular mistake has changed (rather spoiled) the whole meanings. I will not

give any silly excuse for this. For me this is a criminal mistake, and mistake is a mistake. I never had any doubt whatsoever in my mind regarding your sincerity, you were, you are, and hopefully will remain my well wisher in the truest sense and continue to guide me in

future. > > Varun jee, the word you mentioned as " Garda (n) " is incorrect. The correct word is " Gar Vaan " . " Gar " means " If " and " Vaan " means " There " . Perhaps you mistook the Urdu alphabet " Vayo "

as " Daal " in this instance. I too committed a similar mistake and misjudged " Taiy " as " Na " as one " Nukta " was missing from " Taiy " in the Urdu page. > > Respectfully

> Yograj Prabhakar> > > lalkitabee <lalkitabee wrote: Bhai Yograj Ji> > I also confirmed from original text ,it is as legible as quoted by > Mr.Varun.This is not only a misprint, this is an error of reading

or > transliteration. It has been read wrong by u or ur helping hand . So > I think -It is urgent to make correct all phrases by reading u or in > ur presence.If u feel any difficulty of legibility in 1941 book ,u

> can take help of 1942 book or other versions also.U have all the > material & capability .Bcoz some of us are reading orginal books but > other innocent readers are seeking hindi books & we recommend ur

> book as REAL BOOK. Bcoz only u are the Urdu expert or > transliterater ,who is concerned with the transliterated lalkitab, > specially with a team of knowing URDU. I know it was a challenging > work for a single person ,but now this book is an effort of the

> group of same linguists.So u shud publish a " correction list of > misprints & errors " as soon as possible. I know it is a hard job but > for the sake of lalkitab u shud publish. Otherwise saying " DALDA

> BOOKS " for other hindi Lalkitabs, will be a childish activity of > some reputed personalities.> With Regards> Pt.Lalkitabee> V.Shukla> > > > > >

> > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search.>

[Guest guest]

Varun ji, Mahajan ji of Ludhiana is what we can call an expert practitioner/follower of lalkitab. In fact he was the one who adised me to amend a pakki deewar to a kachi deewar in west for shukr-10 by laying additional layer of mud bricks or plastering it with pure mud which I confirmed from ur gudself.

Varun ji it might be coincidence but what do u say about ghar vaan as following lines in gutka say BAAGH BAGICHE, UMDA KOTHE. Umda kothe undoubtedly means to splendid buildings.

kulbirbance

On 3/12/08, kulbir bance <kulbirbance wrote:

 

Mahajan ji, there is no doubt on the issue that gar means agar IF and ghar means rahaish House. at various places pakka ghar and ghar as such been mentioned to denote residence. GaR VAn can only mean " If existing at that place. " we cannot take VAn at par with vaan as meaning beholder/possessor like putarvaan, rathvaan, bhagyavaan, balvaan etc.

kulbirbance

 

On 3/11/08, mts3434 <mts3434 wrote:

 

 

 

 

Sir,aap kis chakar mein ulajh gaye kyon urdu ke liye sirkhapai kar rahe ho? abb agar hindi mein dekhen to kyon nahi ye keh sakte ki ghar vaan ( jaise puttar-vaan ) matlab ki agar ghar ke west deewar kachi ho to ghar-vaan zyada ghar ( makan ) honge. kyonki makan ko hum aaj bhee ghar boltey hain.

mahajan , Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar wrote:

>> Dear Vipin Bhai> > I thank you very much for your concern and the faith you have shown in me. I will rectify every possible mistakes from the book and will upload a Darustee-namaa as soon as possible. I request every mate

including you to point out such errors. > > Kulbir Bhai, I confess and confirm that the correct word in question is " Taiy " not " Na " I agree with you that this particular mistake has changed (rather spoiled) the whole meanings. I will not

give any silly excuse for this. For me this is a criminal mistake, and mistake is a mistake. I never had any doubt whatsoever in my mind regarding your sincerity, you were, you are, and hopefully will remain my well wisher in the truest sense and continue to guide me in

future. > > Varun jee, the word you mentioned as " Garda (n) " is incorrect. The correct word is " Gar Vaan " . " Gar " means " If " and " Vaan " means " There " . Perhaps you mistook the Urdu alphabet " Vayo "

as " Daal " in this instance. I too committed a similar mistake and misjudged " Taiy " as " Na " as one " Nukta " was missing from " Taiy " in the Urdu page. > > Respectfully

> Yograj Prabhakar> > > lalkitabee <lalkitabee wrote: Bhai Yograj Ji> > I also confirmed from original text ,it is as legible as quoted by > Mr.Varun.This is not only a misprint, this is an error of reading

or > transliteration. It has been read wrong by u or ur helping hand . So > I think -It is urgent to make correct all phrases by reading u or in > ur presence.If u feel any difficulty of legibility in 1941 book ,u

> can take help of 1942 book or other versions also.U have all the > material & capability .Bcoz some of us are reading orginal books but > other innocent readers are seeking hindi books & we recommend ur

> book as REAL BOOK. Bcoz only u are the Urdu expert or > transliterater ,who is concerned with the transliterated lalkitab, > specially with a team of knowing URDU. I know it was a challenging > work for a single person ,but now this book is an effort of the

> group of same linguists.So u shud publish a " correction list of > misprints & errors " as soon as possible. I know it is a hard job but > for the sake of lalkitab u shud publish. Otherwise saying " DALDA

> BOOKS " for other hindi Lalkitabs, will be a childish activity of > some reputed personalities.> With Regards> Pt.Lalkitabee> V.Shukla> > > > > >

> > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search.>