Lal Kitab Discussion Group Mangal/shani diamond coral

[Guest guest]

mr kulbir ji, what about mars shani conjunction in the 9th house. In 9th house mars from 28th year gives benefic results. Can one wear red colour clothes then..apply lal chandan tilak and wear moonga for rise of their luck? yours sincerely sanyakulbirbains <kulbirbains wrote: Dear sanya ji, The word lal is used to denote ruby or manaq, coral is referred as moonga. yes gold is good and must be worn because as already stated brahspat's upaya helps keeping rahu and ketu in

control in this conjunction.Sincerely,kulbirbains , sanya mehra <sanyamehra_80 wrote:>> yes mr kulbir ji> > I have read coral prohibition for mars and saturn conjunction in 11th house. Lal Kitab prohibits one to wear heera and lal(=coral) to stay out of debts.> Would it prohibit for its conjuntion in other houses too?> > Does neelam prove beneficial in the presence of such conjunctions in an horoscope?> > And if ruby is prohibited too for such conjunctions, then in the case can one wear gold too as gold is also a metal of sun just like ruby stone belongs to sun.> > Yours sincerely> Sanya> > kulbirbains <kulbirbains wrote:> sorry sanya ji it was a mistake. actually neelam is

recommended for > benefical results its diamond and ruby which are prohibited. i mave > have missed it but if u find coral also prohibited please quote.> kulbir> , "kulbirbains" > <kulbirbains@> wrote:> >> > Sanya ji,> > its diamond and blue sapphire (not coral). yes on the face of it > it > > appears that this prohibitionh is for mangal shani combination > > irrespective of the placement. but i think this gains more > > significance if the combination is in 1st house= pakka ghar of > > mangal shani deblitated, 3rd & 6th house (lord budh), 8th house > > pakka ghar of both mangal & shani,10 th house owner shani & mangal > > exalted,.> > 12 house could be exempt in case of neelam because

mangal here > > controls malefic tendency of rahu.> > pukhraj is reccomended for this combination for benefic results of > > both rahu and ketu> > kulbir---> > In , sanya mehra > > <sanyamehra_80@> wrote:> > >> > > Respected astrologers,> > > Based on the discussion made on earlier messages regarding > gems > > I have a doubt that is diamond and coral prohibited for mars > saturn > > conjunction in general irrespective of the house its placed in or > > this prohibition is subject to only specific houses.> > > Yours sincerely> > > Sanya> > > > > > varun_trvd <varun_trvd@> wrote:> > > Dear Kulbir bhai,> > > > > >

I think Lalkitabee ji would be able to answer this well because > he > > is > > > well versed in the matters of gems.> > > > > > With regards,> > > > > > Varun Trivedi> > > > > > -- In , "kulbirbains" > > > <kulbirbains@> wrote:> > > >> > > > continuation of my earlier message- 1.under the subheading > > mangal > > > > shani it is written neelam rahu utam phal dega, heera jo > mangal > > ka > > > > dushman bimari karza paida karega, suraj sab kuch barbad > karega .> > > > 2.under kundali 28-01-1910 1942> > > > neele rang (rahu) wali anguthi jab li kyon koi bacha.> > > > kulbir> > >

> , "kulbirbains" > > > > <kulbirbains@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear members,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The general perception also shared by scholars like bhatia > ji > > > etc. > > > > is> > > > > that use of gem stones ESPECIALLY IN RINGS is (almost)not in> > > > > accordance with lalkitab upayas. after reading shri > miglani's > > > > querry> > > > > in lalkitab group i searched the books and found that.> > > > > > > > > > 1. 1952 edition page 955 line 4-5 says dhahine hath ki > ANGUTHI > > > mein> > > > > neelam rahu ki zahira aur poshida

sharaton se bachaye > rakhegha.> > > > > > > > > > 2. lahsuniya / hauldari is recommended for brahspat rahu in > > > khanna > > > > no.2> > > > > > > > > > 3. dhoodh ranga moti for moon, diamond or shell for budh, > dull > > red> > > > > coral/moonga for mars, do ranga pathar cat's eye for ketu > has > > been> > > > > mentioned.> > > > > > > > > > lalkitab discusses general principles and some empty blanks > are> > > > > required to be filled in by the readers on the understanding > > of > > > > that> > > > > principles.> > > > > if neelam is specifically mentioned in lalkitab to be worn > in > > a > > > > ring>

> > > > in a finger then why can't this principle be applied to > other > > > gems?> > > > > > > > > > The very basis for shunning the use of gems is that lalkitab> > > > > recommends only less expensive upayas. but this is never > > written > > > > in lalkitab.> > > > > Pandit ji must be knowing the price of diamond and neelam > when > > he > > > > wrote such in lalkitab.> > > > > > > > > > about quality and price the principle of cavet emptor or > buyer > > > > beware is applicable every where be it a ganth of haldi or an > > > > expensive pukhraj.> > > > > > > > > > The institution of certifying and registering gems is there > in > > > > india.> >

> > > > > > > > Can we stll say with authority that use of gems as remedial > > items > > > > is> > > > > against the principles of lalkitab?> > > > > > > > > > kulbir bains> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Save all your chat conversations. Find them online.> > >> >> > > > > > > > Find a mall, hotel or ATM in any part of India. >

Chat on a cool, new interface. No download required.