Guest guest Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Dear Kiranjit ji, I am afraid I can't agree with your statement " to understand it one has to be of the level of Roop Lal Ji. " Do you mean to say that every one of us who is making an effort to understand the Lal Kitab is wasting our time? Do you mean to say that unless we are as enlightened as Pt. Rupchandji we will not be able to understand the book? Or our efforts wouldn't lead us anywhere. Please for God's sake let the Lal Kitab be a valuable book of astrology, do not make a sacrosanct scripture out of it. I consider it as difficult or easy as Jamini sutra or brihat parashar hora. No less no more. Another thing I disagree with is the notion that the Lal Kitab is independent of Vedic astrology and is a complete system in itself. I consider the Lal Kitab as an off-shoot of the age old Vedic system, hence inter-dependent. Having said that, studying the Lal Kitab is not mixing two contradictory systems. As a matter of fact studying of the Lal Kitab by a Vedic astrologer would result in a beneficial alliance between two complementary systems which would enrich the both. Another thing I disagree with is your statement " LK is meant for laymen who after getting their horoscope prepared,can do the needful themselves. " I have yet to find a more difficult book on astrology than the Lal Kitab. I must have read all the classics of the Vedic astrology, none of them is as difficult as the Lal Kitab. The book is so dificult that I have yet to find a Lal Kitab scholar who seems to have understood the concepts of " 35 sala chakkar " , " dhoke ka grah " , " grahon ki mahadasha " , " grahon ki umra aur khanon ki umra " . There are hardly any scholars who understand the grammar of the book and you say the book is meant for the laymen. I find that in this group there are some people who are making an honest effort to understand some of the concepts and the principles of the Lal Kitab. Therefore it is a pleasure to be a part of a group which has participants who are open, honest, have no persumptions and are so unassuming, have no bloated egos. None of them claims to be a Guru. Every one is equal. You are one of those and I have great regards for you. Sincerely, KP Miglani , kiranjit kumar <kapatjal wrote: > > 'lagan sarnee madras time jo aaj kal hindustaan men chal raha hai- ke mutabik bani hui hai-is liye jin gair- mulak ke mukamaat hindustan se bataraf paschim dikhlaye gaye hain-wahan ki paidayish ke wakt men agar tafaut(that is how i could read the word) ka wakt jama karen to jawab ka hindsa hindustan men paidayesh hone ka wakt samjha jayega-isi tarah hindustan se bataraf poorab ke mukamaat ki paidayesh ke wakt se agar tafaut wakt ka hindsa tafreek kar den to jawab ka hindsa hindustan men paidayish hone ka wakt gina jaayega. > guzishta saalon men green witch se time madras ko diya jaata tha- aaj kal poona ko wahan se wakt jaata hai-wahi madras wala time standard time kahlaata hai.'THIS IS HOW FIRST PAGE OF THE BOOKLET READS.rest r the tables and i hope to post these pages soon .I am not very apt at computers;so the delay . > Miglani ji, LK is a complete system in itself;to understand it one has to be of the level of Roop Lal Ji. In fact, It is not meant for vedic astrologers. How can one mix one system with the other when so far v have not been able to understand even the grammer part of lk fully. Vedic astrology is so comprehensive and complete in itself; why do vedic astrologers hanker after it.LK is meant for laymen who after getting their horoscope prepared,can do the needful themselves.Before knowing Lk;one has to know respected pundit ji;only then one may understand lk system. > sincerely, > kiranjeet > > > > Catch up on fall's hot new shows on TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.