Guest guest Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Guruji if what pt ji wrote once was final then why did he bother to give a corrrection in armaans in farmaans. it is a fact that armaans had many many mistakes that pt ji corrected in the following edition. further 1942 edition was also followed by darusti. secondly in the gutka printed by ravi and bhatia ji has said that pt. Rup Chand Joshi was guided by some forces to the extent that he was a disturbed lot. i don't doubt bhatia ji at all if he has written it must have been a truth and if that is truth then that force is out there now also. from this it appears pt ji was amedium and not originator ;lkie Krishnamurthy. i think u must have read the postings in lalkitab group by bhatia ji where he tried his level best to explain the concept of forteign birth, twins and lagn sarani. i don't think that a person of his calibre can be disturbed by these discussions so please don't be disturbed that some persons can form agroup to tarnish lalkitab. on the contrary i am shocked by ur gudself using the term pseudo intellectuals. now from the posting who appears to u be a pseudo intellectual. upadhaya ji, bhooshan priya, shukla ji, varun ji, tyagi ji, punit ji, bhatia ji. if they are trying efforts in the direction to explain the rational and logics of this book and scientific analysis of upayas and other methods that is not pseudo intellectuism. infact that is thevgreatest service to lalkitab to give its proper identity i.e. it is a logical ratinal book and not mere a book of tonas and totkas. kulbir bains , " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar wrote: > > Respected forum members > > I would have expressed my views much earlier on this topic but I > purposely prefer to stay away. Some of my friends constantly > questioned my silence on this issue, some of them even wrote to me and > asked me to clarify my stand. So my answer/explaination is especially > for them. > > (1). The motive of a new pseudo intelligencia behind this ongoing > dispute is obviously malefied; even a fool can sense the stinking > smell of personal vendetta in it. I always treated Shri Rajinder > Bhatia ji as a friend, philosopher and guide as far as Lal Kitab is > concerned, so I refuse to be a part of the one point agenda of " Bhatia > bashing " . > . > (2). For me, whatever is said/written by Pundit ji was/is/ and will > always remain as " the final edict " and no individual or condition can > force me to alter my stance. > > (3). For me, Lal Kitab is not just another book of astrology, it is a > Zinda Granth, therefore I refuse to become a part of any so-called > academic postmortem destined for proving this document (Lagan Sarnee) > and Pt. Rup Chand Joshi incorrect. > > (4). The same lobby that unsuccesfully tried in the past to prove that > the revered Lal Kitab syatem is not Pt. Rup Chand joshi ji's creation > has once again become active and is vigorously working to accomplish > their sinister desires, and Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji is figting this > battle single handedly. If people know Pt. Rup Chand Joshi as > originator of the Lal Kitab system today, it is only due to Shri > Rajinder Bhatia, and the whole Lal Kitab community shall always remain > indebted to him. Under such circumstances, if I cannot stand behind > such devotee, atleat I can refuse to be a part of any futile debate > meant for maligning his image. > > (5). As far as the importance and relevance of Lagan Sarnee is > concerned, for those who have the better means are free to ignore it, > who is stopping them? No one can compel anyone to use a particular > tool. If people think that Shri Rajinder Bhatia is adopting an adamant > attitude, what name should be given to their own " main na manoo " > attitude? Dear friends, standing firm on his/her stand cannot be > treated as a crime and I congratulate Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji for his > solid standpoint. > > I can only request to those who claimed to be the Bhagats of revered > Lal Kitab not to forget the primary dictum " ilm aur aalim ki > badkhoyee se parhez chahiye. " > > > > Respectfully > Yograj Prabhakar > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.