Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Conrtoversy over Lagan Sarnee/prabhakar ji

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guruji

if what pt ji wrote once was final then why did he bother to give a

corrrection in armaans in farmaans. it is a fact that armaans had

many many mistakes that pt ji corrected in the following edition.

further 1942 edition was also followed by darusti.

 

secondly in the gutka printed by ravi and bhatia ji

has said that pt. Rup Chand Joshi was guided by some forces to the

extent that he was a disturbed lot. i don't doubt bhatia ji at all

if he has written it must have been a truth and if that is truth

then that force is out there now also. from this it appears pt ji

was amedium and not originator ;lkie Krishnamurthy.

 

i think u must have read the postings in lalkitab group by bhatia

ji where he tried his level best to explain the concept of forteign

birth, twins and lagn sarani. i don't think that a person of his

calibre can be disturbed by these discussions

so please don't be disturbed that some persons can form agroup to

tarnish lalkitab.

on the contrary i am shocked by ur gudself using the term pseudo

intellectuals. now from the posting who appears to u be a pseudo

intellectual. upadhaya ji, bhooshan priya, shukla ji, varun ji,

tyagi ji, punit ji, bhatia ji.

if they are trying efforts in the direction to explain the rational

and logics of this book and scientific analysis of upayas and other

methods that is not pseudo intellectuism. infact that is

thevgreatest service to lalkitab to give its proper identity i.e. it

is a logical ratinal book and not mere a book of tonas and totkas.

 

kulbir bains

, " Yograj Prabhakar "

<yr_prabhakar wrote:

>

> Respected forum members

>

> I would have expressed my views much earlier on this topic but I

> purposely prefer to stay away. Some of my friends constantly

> questioned my silence on this issue, some of them even wrote to me

and

> asked me to clarify my stand. So my answer/explaination is

especially

> for them.

>

> (1). The motive of a new pseudo intelligencia behind this ongoing

> dispute is obviously malefied; even a fool can sense the stinking

> smell of personal vendetta in it. I always treated Shri Rajinder

> Bhatia ji as a friend, philosopher and guide as far as Lal Kitab is

> concerned, so I refuse to be a part of the one point agenda

of " Bhatia

> bashing " .

> .

> (2). For me, whatever is said/written by Pundit ji was/is/ and

will

> always remain as " the final edict " and no individual or condition

can

> force me to alter my stance.

>

> (3). For me, Lal Kitab is not just another book of astrology, it

is a

> Zinda Granth, therefore I refuse to become a part of any so-called

> academic postmortem destined for proving this document (Lagan

Sarnee)

> and Pt. Rup Chand Joshi incorrect.

>

> (4). The same lobby that unsuccesfully tried in the past to prove

that

> the revered Lal Kitab syatem is not Pt. Rup Chand joshi ji's

creation

> has once again become active and is vigorously working to

accomplish

> their sinister desires, and Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji is figting this

> battle single handedly. If people know Pt. Rup Chand Joshi as

> originator of the Lal Kitab system today, it is only due to Shri

> Rajinder Bhatia, and the whole Lal Kitab community shall always

remain

> indebted to him. Under such circumstances, if I cannot stand behind

> such devotee, atleat I can refuse to be a part of any futile debate

> meant for maligning his image.

>

> (5). As far as the importance and relevance of Lagan Sarnee is

> concerned, for those who have the better means are free to ignore

it,

> who is stopping them? No one can compel anyone to use a particular

> tool. If people think that Shri Rajinder Bhatia is adopting an

adamant

> attitude, what name should be given to their own " main na manoo "

> attitude? Dear friends, standing firm on his/her stand cannot be

> treated as a crime and I congratulate Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji for

his

> solid standpoint.

>

> I can only request to those who claimed to be the Bhagats of

revered

> Lal Kitab not to forget the primary dictum " ilm aur aalim ki

> badkhoyee se parhez chahiye. "

>

>

>

> Respectfully

> Yograj Prabhakar

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...