Guest guest Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 another myth associated with lalkitab is that rashi or rashi lord have no place in lalkitab whereas; it is written that 1. find out the rashi lord. 1. observe the rashi sign on palm. 2. write it in the pacca ghar of the kundali with the corresponding house on the palm. fill other rashi numbers in accordance with this sign. the sign which thus appers on lagan house. it will be the lagan rashi and it's lord rashi lord. 2. THIS RASHI LORD PLANET malik grah v hasyat ghar WILL ALWAYS BE THAT OF RASHIPHAL. it is a samudrik method to be adopted to find out the lagan lord. my question is IF WE KNOW THE RASHI LAGAN LORD BY ASTRONOMICAL CALCULATIONS, SHOULDN'T THE SAME PRINCIPLE BE APPLICABLE in this tewa also. kulbirbains Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2007 Report Share Posted October 3, 2007 Dear Kulbir bhai, Lagna lord and rasi lord [ the lord of the sign where moon is placed ] have relevance in all systems of astrology, be it Vedic, western or Lal Kitab. As I understand the Lal Kitab system is not an independent system by it self, it is a sub system of the traditional Vedic system in its simplified form. The Lal Kitab system has an advantage over the traditional Vedic system because it suggests `samadhaan' [ solution ] also through simple and easy to do upaya. Most of the astrology systems identify the `samasya' [ problem ] but seldom suggest the `samadhaan' for it. Coming to your query : Lal Kitab incorporates palmistry as a tool for confirmation of the analysis based on Kundali drawn for the birth details. What Pandit Rupchand ji seems to suggest that there will be two kundalis, one based on astrological calculations and the other drawn on the basis of the features perceptible on the palm. The two kundalis may not necessarily be identical. He further goes to suggest that the Lagnesh of the kundali drawn according to the features on the palm will be treated as of Rasiphal. Since most of us have little knowledge of palmistry it would be advisable that we go by the kundali drawn astrologically. A kundali thus drawn is certain to be accurate where as a kundali drawn on the principles of palmistry may not always be accurate. Regards, Varun Trivedi , " kulbirbains " <kulbirbains wrote: > > another myth associated with lalkitab is that rashi or rashi lord have > no place in lalkitab whereas; > it is written that > 1. find out the rashi lord. 1. observe the rashi sign on palm. 2. > write it in the pacca ghar of the kundali with the corresponding house > on the palm. fill other rashi numbers in accordance with this sign. > the sign which thus appers on lagan house. it will be the lagan rashi > and it's lord rashi lord. > 2. THIS RASHI LORD PLANET malik grah v hasyat ghar WILL ALWAYS BE THAT > OF RASHIPHAL. > it is a samudrik method to be adopted to find out the lagan lord. > my question is IF WE KNOW THE RASHI LAGAN LORD BY ASTRONOMICAL > CALCULATIONS, SHOULDN'T THE SAME PRINCIPLE BE APPLICABLE in this tewa > also. > kulbirbains > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.