Guest guest Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 Dear members, The general perception also shared by scholars like bhatia ji etc. is that use of gem stones ESPECIALLY IN RINGS is (almost)not in accordance with lalkitab upayas. after reading shri miglani's querry in lalkitab group i searched the books and found that. 1. 1952 edition page 955 line 4-5 says dhahine hath ki ANGUTHI mein neelam rahu ki zahira aur poshida sharaton se bachaye rakhegha. 2. lahsuniya / hauldari is recommended for brahspat rahu in khanna no.2 3. dhoodh ranga moti for moon, diamond or shell for budh, dull red coral/moonga for mars, do ranga pathar cat's eye for ketu has been mentioned. lalkitab discusses general principles and some empty blanks are required to be filled in by the readers on the understanding of that principles. if neelam is specifically mentioned in lalkitab to be worn in a ring in a finger then why can't this principle be applied to other gems? The very basis for shunning the use of gems is that lalkitab recommends only less expensive upayas. but this is never written in lalkitab. Pandit ji must be knowing the price of diamond and neelam when he wrote such in lalkitab. about quality and price the principle of cavet emptor or buyer beware is applicable every where be it a ganth of haldi or an expensive pukhraj. The institution of certifying and registering gems is there in india. Can we stll say with authority that use of gems as remedial items is against the principles of lalkitab? kulbir bains Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 should people with mangal-shani combination avoid blue coloured clothes also? kulbir , " kulbirbains " <kulbirbains wrote: > > continuation of my earlier message- 1.under the subheading mangal > shani it is written neelam rahu utam phal dega, heera jo mangal ka > dushman bimari karza paida karega, suraj sab kuch barbad karega . > 2.under kundali 28-01-1910 1942 > neele rang (rahu) wali anguthi jab li kyon koi bacha. > kulbir > , " kulbirbains " > <kulbirbains@> wrote: > > > > Dear members, > > > > > > The general perception also shared by scholars like bhatia ji etc. > is > > that use of gem stones ESPECIALLY IN RINGS is (almost)not in > > accordance with lalkitab upayas. after reading shri miglani's > querry > > in lalkitab group i searched the books and found that. > > > > 1. 1952 edition page 955 line 4-5 says dhahine hath ki ANGUTHI mein > > neelam rahu ki zahira aur poshida sharaton se bachaye rakhegha. > > > > 2. lahsuniya / hauldari is recommended for brahspat rahu in khanna > no.2 > > > > 3. dhoodh ranga moti for moon, diamond or shell for budh, dull red > > coral/moonga for mars, do ranga pathar cat's eye for ketu has been > > mentioned. > > > > lalkitab discusses general principles and some empty blanks are > > required to be filled in by the readers on the understanding of > that > > principles. > > if neelam is specifically mentioned in lalkitab to be worn in a > ring > > in a finger then why can't this principle be applied to other gems? > > > > The very basis for shunning the use of gems is that lalkitab > > recommends only less expensive upayas. but this is never written > in lalkitab. > > Pandit ji must be knowing the price of diamond and neelam when he > wrote such in lalkitab. > > > > about quality and price the principle of cavet emptor or buyer > beware is applicable every where be it a ganth of haldi or an > expensive pukhraj. > > > > The institution of certifying and registering gems is there in > india. > > > > Can we stll say with authority that use of gems as remedial items > is > > against the principles of lalkitab? > > > > kulbir bains > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 Dear Kulbir bhai, I think Lalkitabee ji would be able to answer this well because he is well versed in the matters of gems. With regards, Varun Trivedi -- In , " kulbirbains " <kulbirbains wrote: > > continuation of my earlier message- 1.under the subheading mangal > shani it is written neelam rahu utam phal dega, heera jo mangal ka > dushman bimari karza paida karega, suraj sab kuch barbad karega . > 2.under kundali 28-01-1910 1942 > neele rang (rahu) wali anguthi jab li kyon koi bacha. > kulbir > , " kulbirbains " > <kulbirbains@> wrote: > > > > Dear members, > > > > > > The general perception also shared by scholars like bhatia ji etc. > is > > that use of gem stones ESPECIALLY IN RINGS is (almost)not in > > accordance with lalkitab upayas. after reading shri miglani's > querry > > in lalkitab group i searched the books and found that. > > > > 1. 1952 edition page 955 line 4-5 says dhahine hath ki ANGUTHI mein > > neelam rahu ki zahira aur poshida sharaton se bachaye rakhegha. > > > > 2. lahsuniya / hauldari is recommended for brahspat rahu in khanna > no.2 > > > > 3. dhoodh ranga moti for moon, diamond or shell for budh, dull red > > coral/moonga for mars, do ranga pathar cat's eye for ketu has been > > mentioned. > > > > lalkitab discusses general principles and some empty blanks are > > required to be filled in by the readers on the understanding of > that > > principles. > > if neelam is specifically mentioned in lalkitab to be worn in a > ring > > in a finger then why can't this principle be applied to other gems? > > > > The very basis for shunning the use of gems is that lalkitab > > recommends only less expensive upayas. but this is never written > in lalkitab. > > Pandit ji must be knowing the price of diamond and neelam when he > wrote such in lalkitab. > > > > about quality and price the principle of cavet emptor or buyer > beware is applicable every where be it a ganth of haldi or an > expensive pukhraj. > > > > The institution of certifying and registering gems is there in > india. > > > > Can we stll say with authority that use of gems as remedial items > is > > against the principles of lalkitab? > > > > kulbir bains > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.