Hindi transliterated Samudrik ke lalkitab ke farman 1939

July 24, 2007

Res. Members,

Recently Ihave come accross a book which claims to be an authentic

translation of Revrad Pandit ji's 1939 work titled as Samudrik ke

lalkitab ke farman " which was forwaded by the known personalties of

lakitab such as Rajender bhatia, Rajivee kumar khattar,Maheshwar Singh

Kondal, and Respected yograj parbhakar. Friends i was shocked that the

page no seven of the book says that Mars (mangal) is significator of

Sasural (in-laws) whereas there is no mention of Rahu in this regard.

Freinds, the page no. 203 shocked me a lot which that Rahu, which is

inimical to Sun Debilitats it, I could not understand how come my

learned freinds who have forwarded the book by saying that this book

would keep you away from " DALDA " books.

Freinds, I am sorry to say, but duty bound to convey to the group

members that What so ever you do but for god sake do not defame the

Gods word said through lalkitab. Please take care while forwarding any

book on lal kitab because you are esteemed scholars of lal kitab.

If I am wrong please reply my quires. I have a lot of quires on this

book from my reveren learned firends on this book.

Yours

Umesh Sharma

July 25, 2007

Respected Pt. Umesh Sharma ji,

The two anomalies { ? } you have pointed out in the Hindi edition,

are there in the original Urdu book also. I have personally checked

these pages in the urdu edition. Therefore we can not blame the

person who has done the transliteration of this edition.

The translator has kept to the original text. We have the Hindi

edition also.

Should Mars be a significator of sasural { house of in-laws } or not

is a different question. Similarly about rahu whether it eclipses

the Sun or debilitates it is yet another question. The Lal Kitab

scholars can have a meaningful discussion on that.

Our personal view is that the 2nd house and rahu are associated with

sasural. But we have to find a logical explanation as to why Pandit

ji mentioned that Mars is a significator of sasural; and if that be

so then under what circumstances.

Similarly, does Rahu debilitate the Sun or eclipses the Sun? Since

grahan lagana { eclipsing} and neech karana { debilitating } are two

different concepts we have to decide which of the two is done to the

Sun by rahu.

Our personal view is that the Rahu eclipses the Sun and that is why

for the Sun and Rahu the book says grahan ravi ki qismat hoti.

Now coming to your second question; should the people write

foreword of a book or not, is a personal matter of those gentleman

who wrote for the book, and it will be unethical to comment on that.

However it is true that such messages appear in the second edition

of the book when the people have read the book and formed an opinion

on it.

Sir, we would request you to participate in the group as and when

time permits. But we would be obliged if it is more frequently

done. Sir, we consider you as one of the eminent scholars of Lal

Kitab.

With respect and regards,

Chandra Prakash

, " Umesh Sharma "

<mudit982001 wrote:

>

> Res. Members,

> Recently Ihave come accross a book which claims to be an authentic

> translation of Revrad Pandit ji's 1939 work titled as Samudrik ke

> lalkitab ke farman " which was forwaded by the known personalties of

> lakitab such as Rajender bhatia, Rajivee kumar khattar,Maheshwar

Singh

> Kondal, and Respected yograj parbhakar. Friends i was shocked that

the

> page no seven of the book says that Mars (mangal) is significator

of

> Sasural (in-laws) whereas there is no mention of Rahu in this

regard.

> Freinds, the page no. 203 shocked me a lot which that Rahu,

which is

> inimical to Sun Debilitats it, I could not understand how come my

> learned freinds who have forwarded the book by saying that this

book

> would keep you away from " DALDA " books.

> Freinds, I am sorry to say, but duty bound to convey to the group

> members that What so ever you do but for god sake do not defame the

> Gods word said through lalkitab. Please take care while forwarding

any

> book on lal kitab because you are esteemed scholars of lal kitab.

> If I am wrong please reply my quires. I have a lot of quires on

this

> book from my reveren learned firends on this book.

> Yours

> Umesh Sharma

>

July 25, 2007

Please read the original Urdu 1939 book (which you claim to have in your possession) before you get "shocked." The Hindi transliteration has reproduced the original text extremely faithfully. The transliteration does have some very minor misprints which have already been noted on Astrostudents web site.

Most of us who sent messages towards the release of the Hindi book had access to the manuscript of the book. We were very impressed by the quality and attention to detail and the hard work put in by Goswami jee's team and only then the messages were written. Some of the people whose names you've mentioned in your Email, participated very actively in proof reading the book and spent many many long hours and nights doing so (me excluded.) I have a first hand knowledge about this because I was in India in Sept-October 2006 and we had a full-day (over eight hours) meeting with Goswami jee regarding this book where-in it was decided that the transliteration was to be as true as possible. For example, Venus was to be written as "shukkar" and not as "shukra" and the same for "chandar" and not "chandra" etc. to maintain the Urdu flavour of the original book. In fact, I mentioned this in one of my Emails to the LalKitab and Astrostudents forum just before the book was published.

If you have the original Urdu books and the associated errata sheets (as you claim to have), please do read them. in kitabon ka sevan keejiye, in kotaabon kee kewal seva matr se kucch bhee haasil naheen hoga, in ke sewan mein hee sab kucch hai. sirf book-case mein rakhne aur "revered book" ya "God's words" ka naaraa lagaana, ya ise nitya prati dhoop-diya dikhaana vyarth hai. yadi aap ne in kitabon ko in ke mool roop mein baar baar paDhaa hota (arthaat nitya sewan kiya hota) to aap yah sawaal uTha kar yah shaq naa paida karwaate ke aap ne in kitaabon ko kabhee khol kar dekha bhee hai.

Can't read Urdu? Wait one more month. Transliterated 'Lal Kitab ke Armaan' in Hindi, is scheduled to be released in August this year. This is the first time ever that the 1940 volume will be available in Hindi. Let me give you a real "shock" (since you don't seem to have read this book either.) There is a big chapter on error corrections in the Armaan book that applies directly to the 1939 Farmaan book. Surprised? Shocked?

Rajinder Bhatia , "Umesh Sharma" <mudit982001 wrote:>> Res. Members,> Recently Ihave come accross a book which claims to be an authentic> translation of Revrad Pandit ji's 1939 work titled as Samudrik ke> lalkitab ke farman" which was forwaded by the known personalties of> lakitab such as Rajender bhatia, Rajivee kumar khattar,Maheshwar Singh> Kondal, and Respected yograj parbhakar. Friends i was shocked that the> page no seven of the book says that Mars (mangal) is significator of> Sasural (in-laws) whereas there is no mention of Rahu in this regard.> Freinds, the page no. 203 shocked me a lot which that Rahu, which is> inimical to Sun Debilitats it, I could not understand how come my> learned freinds who have forwarded the book by saying that this book> would keep you away from "DALDA" books.> Freinds, I am sorry to say, but duty bound to convey to the group> members that What so ever you do but for god sake do not defame the> Gods word said through lalkitab. Please take care while forwarding any> book on lal kitab because you are esteemed scholars of lal kitab.> If I am wrong please reply my quires. I have a lot of quires on this> book from my reveren learned firends on this book.> Yours> Umesh Sharma>