Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Dear lyrastro1, It is not clear what the rule says when the 5th CSL is in Moon's hora and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice versa). As per the rule, it could be either male or female. Pls clarify. Regards, Rangarajan , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote: > Dear Members, > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as per his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a Female ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > It is suggested that members please try this and inform their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > Yours sincerely, > lyrastro1 > GOOD LUCK ! > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, " if the 5th CSL or its starlord is in Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon Hora,--- Female " . 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's article (K.P. & Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my application example in Msg #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule is " if no planet is in the star of the 5th CSL, " the 5th CSL itself " is to be taken in testing in which Hora. If there is or are planet(s) in the star of the 5th CSL, the " starlord of the 5th CSL " is to be taken in testing in which Hora. Best regards, tw , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy " <ranga@m...> wrote: > > Dear lyrastro1, > It is not clear what the rule says when the 5th CSL is in Moon's hora > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice versa). As per the rule, it > could be either male or female. Pls clarify. > > Regards, > Rangarajan > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> > wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars > rule,as per his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I have experimented with it > and found it very correct... > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child > is a Female ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > It is suggested that members please try this and > inform their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > > Yours sincerely, > > lyrastro1 > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Dear Yogegh Rao The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional Charts which was not mentioned by KSK. The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KP and applies to all cusps --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > Dear Members, > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as per > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very simple to > apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a Female > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > It is suggested that members please try this and inform > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very practicable > and ACCURATE RULE...! > Yours sincerely, > lyrastro1 > GOOD LUCK ! > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. --------- A.R.Raichur bombay anant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY tel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Dear all, raichur ji is right I think CKV is best I am check with my available data. and still cantinue. regards kanak >anant raichur <anant_1608 > > >Re: GENDER DETERMINATION ... >Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST) > >Dear Yogegh Rao > >The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional Charts > >which was not mentioned by KSK. > >The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KP > >and applies to all cusps > > >--- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as per > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very simple to > > apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > > "If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a Female > > !" This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > It is suggested that members please try this and inform > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very practicable > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > Yours sincerely, > > lyrastro1 > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. > >--------- >A.R.Raichur bombay >anant_1608 >raichuranant >USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY >tel: 022-2506 2609 >--------- > > > > > > > Thinking of a vacation? Get all the best deals. Right here at MSN Travel! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2005 Report Share Posted March 16, 2005 Dear Senior Members : I am seeing a lot of discussion on Gender Determination . It is interesting .However some questions remain. There are a lot of births now a days ,MULTIPLE, i.e.,2 or 3 babies delivered by the Same Lady , one after the other , both Male and Female . Also in these cases some babies survive and some do not . The Questions are ; 1. How do you first of all predict the Genders and the Number of babies that are going to be born ? 2. How to predict which baby is going to Survive ? 3. How do you prepare the individual horoscopes for these babies ? Please give your valuable opinion in this matter . Thanks and Regards . SRW anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Yogegh RaoThe Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional Chartswhich was not mentioned by KSK.The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KPand applies to all cusps--- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:> Dear Members,> Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as per> his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very simple to> apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct...> "If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's> hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a Female> !" This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar...> It is suggested that members please try this and inform> their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very practicable> and ACCURATE RULE...!> Yours sincerely,> lyrastro1> GOOD LUCK !> > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.--------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranantUSE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear Tin Win, Thanks for the clarification. This seems to make sense. Regards, Rangarajan , " tw853 " <tw853> wrote: > > Dear Rangarajan, > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, " if the 5th CSL or its starlord is in > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon Hora,--- Female " . > > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's article (K.P. & > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my application example in Msg > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule is " if no planet is in > the star of the 5th CSL, " the 5th CSL itself " is to be taken in > testing in which Hora. If there is or are planet(s) in the star of > the 5th CSL, the " starlord of the 5th CSL " is to be taken in testing > in which Hora. > > Best regards, > > tw > > > , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy " > <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > Dear lyrastro1, > > It is not clear what the rule says when the 5th CSL is in Moon's > hora > > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice versa). As per the rule, > it > > could be either male or female. Pls clarify. > > > > Regards, > > Rangarajan > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> > > wrote: > > > Dear Members, > > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars > > rule,as per his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I have experimented with it > > and found it very correct... > > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is > in > > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the > child > > is a Female ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > It is suggested that members please try this > and > > inform their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and > > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > Yours sincerely, > > > lyrastro1 > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, It would be better if you read the article for yourself...I have given you the reference... lyrastro1Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Tin Win,Thanks for the clarification. This seems to make sense.Regards,Rangarajan , "tw853" <tw853> wrote:> > Dear Rangarajan, > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, "if the 5th CSL or its starlord is in > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon Hora,--- Female".> > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's article (K.P. & > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my application example in Msg > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule is "if no planet is in > the star of the 5th CSL, "the 5th CSL itself" is to be taken in > testing in which Hora. If there is or are planet(s) in the star of > the 5th CSL, the "starlord of the 5th CSL" is to be taken in testing > in which Hora. > > Best regards,> > tw> > > , "Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" > <ranga@m...> wrote:> > > > Dear lyrastro1,> > It is not clear what the rule says when the 5th CSL is in Moon's > hora> > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice versa). As per the rule, > it> > could be either male or female. Pls clarify.> > > > Regards,> > Rangarajan> > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1>> > wrote:> > > Dear Members,> > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars> > rule,as per his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp> > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I have experimented with it> > and found it very correct...> > > "If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is > in> > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the > child> > is a Female !" This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar...> > > It is suggested that members please try this > and> > inform their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and> > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...!> > > Yours sincerely,> > > lyrastro1> > > GOOD LUCK !> > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. India Matrimony: Find your life partner online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, The rule IS very simple to apply...Moons Hora or Sun's hora,is all what you have to determine...Take the sublord...for judgement,it will come correct...! lyrastro1 Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Tin Win,Thanks for the clarification. This seems to make sense.Regards,Rangarajan , "tw853" <tw853> wrote:> > Dear Rangarajan, > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, "if the 5th CSL or its starlord is in > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon Hora,--- Female".> > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's article (K.P. & > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my application example in Msg > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule is "if no planet is in > the star of the 5th CSL, "the 5th CSL itself" is to be taken in > testing in which Hora. If there is or are planet(s) in the star of > the 5th CSL, the "starlord of the 5th CSL" is to be taken in testing > in which Hora. > > Best regards,> > tw> > > , "Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" > <ranga@m...> wrote:> > > > Dear lyrastro1,> > It is not clear what the rule says when the 5th CSL is in Moon's > hora> > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice versa). As per the rule, > it> > could be either male or female. Pls clarify.> > > > Regards,> > Rangarajan> > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1>> > wrote:> > > Dear Members,> > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars> > rule,as per his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp> > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I have experimented with it> > and found it very correct...> > > "If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is > in> > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the > child> > is a Female !" This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar...> > > It is suggested that members please try this > and> > inform their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and> > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...!> > > Yours sincerely,> > > lyrastro1> > > GOOD LUCK !> > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. India Matrimony: Find your life partner online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Thank you Sir, I will try. Regards, Rangarajan , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote: > Dear Rangarajan, > The rule IS very simple to apply...Moons Hora or Sun's hora,is all what you have to determine...Take the sublord...for judgement,it will come correct...! > lyrastro1 > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> wrote: > > Dear Tin Win, > Thanks for the clarification. This seems to make sense. > > Regards, > Rangarajan > > , " tw853 " <tw853> wrote: > > > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, " if the 5th CSL or its starlord is in > > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon Hora,--- Female " . > > > > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's article (K.P. & > > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my application example in Msg > > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule is " if no planet is in > > the star of the 5th CSL, " the 5th CSL itself " is to be taken in > > testing in which Hora. If there is or are planet(s) in the star of > > the 5th CSL, the " starlord of the 5th CSL " is to be taken in testing > > in which Hora. > > > > Best regards, > > > > tw > > > > > > , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy " > > <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear lyrastro1, > > > It is not clear what the rule says when the 5th CSL is in Moon's > > hora > > > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice versa). As per the rule, > > it > > > could be either male or female. Pls clarify. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Members, > > > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars > > > rule,as per his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > > > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I have experimented with it > > > and found it very correct... > > > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is > > in > > > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the > > child > > > is a Female ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > > It is suggested that members please try this > > and > > > inform their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and > > > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, I have a concern here. 7 Cusp indicates spouse and also the 2nd child. If we analyze the 7 cusp of a male using CVK rule, the sex of the 2nd child should be female. This need not come true, a man can have 2 sons without having any female child. Regards, Upadhyaya --- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: > > > Thank you Sir, I will try. > > Regards, > Rangarajan > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > <lyrastro1> > wrote: > > Dear Rangarajan, > > The rule IS very simple to > apply...Moons > Hora or Sun's hora,is all what you have to > determine...Take the > sublord...for judgement,it will come correct...! > > lyrastro1 > > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > Dear Tin Win, > > Thanks for the clarification. This seems to make > sense. > > > > Regards, > > Rangarajan > > > > , " tw853 " > <tw853> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > > > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, " if the 5th CSL > or its starlord > is in > > > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon > Hora,--- Female " . > > > > > > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's > article (K.P. & > > > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my > application example in > Msg > > > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule > is " if no planet > is in > > > the star of the 5th CSL, " the 5th CSL itself " > is to be taken in > > > testing in which Hora. If there is or are > planet(s) in the star > of > > > the 5th CSL, the " starlord of the 5th CSL " is to > be taken in > testing > > > in which Hora. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > , " Rangarajan > Krishnamoorthy " > > > <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear lyrastro1, > > > > It is not clear what the rule says when the > 5th CSL is in > Moon's > > > hora > > > > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice > versa). As per the > rule, > > > it > > > > could be either male or female. Pls clarify. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao > Lajmi > <lyrastro1> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > Some time ago,I had > quoted Mr.A > Balasekars > > > > rule,as per his article in K.P. & > Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > > > > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I > have experimented > with it > > > > and found it very correct... > > > > > " If the Vth cusp > sublord,or its > starlord is > > > in > > > > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if > Moon's hora then > the > > > child > > > > is a Female ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A > Balasekar... > > > > > It is suggested that > members please try > this > > > and > > > > inform their experiences,in this forum...to > arrive at a simple > and > > > > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > > GOOD LUCK > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life > partneronline. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear Upadhyaya, This point has been discussed in the original article as well as subsequent postings in this group (esp. by Raichur). The 7th cusp should not be used to depict spouse. Regards, Rangarajan , SRINIVASA UPADHYAYA <upadhyaya_p_s> wrote: > Dear Rangarajan, > > I have a concern here. 7 Cusp indicates spouse and > also the 2nd child. If we analyze the 7 cusp of a male > using CVK rule, the sex of the 2nd child should be > female. This need not come true, a man can have 2 sons > without having any female child. > > Regards, > Upadhyaya > > --- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> > wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you Sir, I will try. > > > > Regards, > > Rangarajan > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > > <lyrastro1> > > wrote: > > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > The rule IS very simple to > > apply...Moons > > Hora or Sun's hora,is all what you have to > > determine...Take the > > sublord...for judgement,it will come correct...! > > > lyrastro1 > > > > > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Tin Win, > > > Thanks for the clarification. This seems to make > > sense. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > , " tw853 " > > <tw853> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > > > > > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, " if the 5th CSL > > or its starlord > > is in > > > > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon > > Hora,--- Female " . > > > > > > > > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's > > article (K.P. & > > > > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my > > application example in > > Msg > > > > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden rule > > is " if no planet > > is in > > > > the star of the 5th CSL, " the 5th CSL itself " > > is to be taken in > > > > testing in which Hora. If there is or are > > planet(s) in the star > > of > > > > the 5th CSL, the " starlord of the 5th CSL " is to > > be taken in > > testing > > > > in which Hora. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Rangarajan > > Krishnamoorthy " > > > > <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear lyrastro1, > > > > > It is not clear what the rule says when the > > 5th CSL is in > > Moon's > > > > hora > > > > > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice > > versa). As per the > > rule, > > > > it > > > > > could be either male or female. Pls clarify. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao > > Lajmi > > <lyrastro1> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > > Some time ago,I had > > quoted Mr.A > > Balasekars > > > > > rule,as per his article in K.P. & > > Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > > > > > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I > > have experimented > > with it > > > > > and found it very correct... > > > > > > " If the Vth cusp > > sublord,or its > > starlord is > > > > in > > > > > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if > > Moon's hora then > > the > > > > child > > > > > is a Female ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A > > Balasekar... > > > > > > It is suggested that > > members please try > > this > > > > and > > > > > inform their experiences,in this forum...to > > arrive at a simple > > and > > > > > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > > > GOOD LUCK > > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life > > partneronline. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Raichur ji, I disagree with your comments. We are using merely the division and not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV rule, it is also very unorthodox and similar to classical astrology method of adding values for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we take a house or group of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & 11 for marriage. But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets i.e. Rahu, Ketu and Saturn for determining the sex of child, which seems not a KP way to me. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: > Dear Yogegh Rao > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional > Charts > > which was not mentioned by KSK. > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KP > > and applies to all cusps > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as > per > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very simple > to > > apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a > Female > > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > It is suggested that members please try this and > inform > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very > practicable > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > Yours sincerely, > > lyrastro1 > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. > > --------- > A.R.Raichur bombay > anant_1608 > raichuranant > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY > tel: 022-2506 2609 > --------- > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, Thank you. I did not go through those mails. Regards, Upadhyaya --- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: > > > Dear Upadhyaya, > This point has been discussed in the original > article as well as > subsequent postings in this group (esp. by Raichur). > The 7th cusp > should not be used to depict spouse. > > Regards, > Rangarajan > > , SRINIVASA > UPADHYAYA > <upadhyaya_p_s> wrote: > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > > I have a concern here. 7 Cusp indicates spouse and > > also the 2nd child. If we analyze the 7 cusp of a > male > > using CVK rule, the sex of the 2nd child should be > > female. This need not come true, a man can have 2 > sons > > without having any female child. > > > > Regards, > > Upadhyaya > > > > --- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Sir, I will try. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao > Lajmi > > > <lyrastro1> > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > > The rule IS very > simple to > > > apply...Moons > > > Hora or Sun's hora,is all what you have to > > > determine...Take the > > > sublord...for judgement,it will come correct...! > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Tin Win, > > > > Thanks for the clarification. This seems to > make > > > sense. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > > > , " tw853 " > > > <tw853> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rangarajan, > > > > > > > > > > 1. Balasekar's Hora Rule says, " if the 5th > CSL > > > or its starlord > > > is in > > > > > Sun's Hora, the child sex is Male,---in Moon > > > Hora,--- Female " . > > > > > > > > > > 2. As per given examples in the Balasekar's > > > article (K.P. & > > > > > Astrology, Annual, 2000, pp 39-41) and my > > > application example in > > > Msg > > > > > #2671 & repeated in Msg #3039, the hidden > rule > > > is " if no planet > > > is in > > > > > the star of the 5th CSL, " the 5th CSL > itself " > > > is to be taken in > > > > > testing in which Hora. If there is or are > > > planet(s) in the star > > > of > > > > > the 5th CSL, the " starlord of the 5th CSL " > is to > > > be taken in > > > testing > > > > > in which Hora. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > " Rangarajan > > > Krishnamoorthy " > > > > > <ranga@m...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear lyrastro1, > > > > > > It is not clear what the rule says when > the > > > 5th CSL is in > > > Moon's > > > > > hora > > > > > > and its starlord is in Sun's hora (or vice > > > versa). As per the > > > rule, > > > > > it > > > > > > could be either male or female. Pls > clarify. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > > > > > > > , Yogesh > Rao > > > Lajmi > > > <lyrastro1> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > > > Some time ago,I had > > > quoted Mr.A > > > Balasekars > > > > > > rule,as per his article in K.P. & > > > Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > > > > > > 39-41.,which is very simple to apply,and I > > > have experimented > > > with it > > > > > > and found it very correct... > > > > > > > " If the Vth cusp > > > sublord,or its > > > starlord is > > > > > in > > > > > > Sun's hora,the sex of the child is male,if > > > Moon's hora then > > > the > > > > > child > > > > > > is a Female ! " This is the rule given by > Mr.A > > > Balasekar... > > > > > > > It is suggested that > > > members please try > > > this > > > > > and > > > > > > inform their experiences,in this > forum...to > > > arrive at a simple > > > and > > > > > > very practicable and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > > > > GOOD > LUCK > > > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life > > > partneronline. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2005 Report Share Posted March 18, 2005 Dear Mr Pandey Thank you for your comments. Go ahead and use the Hora Chart good luck --- Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Raichur ji, > > I disagree with your comments. We are using merely the division and > not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV rule, it is also very > unorthodox and similar to classical astrology method of adding values > for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we take a house or group > of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & 11 for marriage. > But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets i.e. Rahu, Ketu and > Saturn for determining the sex of child, which seems not a KP way to > me. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant raichur > <anant_1608 wrote: > > Dear Yogegh Rao > > > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional > > Charts > > > > which was not mentioned by KSK. > > > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KP > > > > and applies to all cusps > > > > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > > > Dear Members, > > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as > > per > > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very > simple > > to > > > apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's > > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a > > Female > > > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > It is suggested that members please try this and > > inform > > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very > > practicable > > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > Yours sincerely, > > > lyrastro1 > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. > > > > --------- > > A.R.Raichur bombay > > anant_1608 > > raichuranant > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY > > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > --------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2005 Report Share Posted March 18, 2005 --Mr. Punit Pandey and Members, To try Balasekara's rule a planet's Sun hora or Moon hora is to be known. Can u explain how does one find out the the planet's sun or moon Hora. with Regards SHUBARAG To tr- In , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > Raichur ji, > > I disagree with your comments. We are using merely the division and > not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV rule, it is also very > unorthodox and similar to classical astrology method of adding values > for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we take a house or group > of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & 11 for marriage. > But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets i.e. Rahu, Ketu and > Saturn for determining the sex of child, which seems not a KP way to > me. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant raichur > <anant_1608> wrote: > > Dear Yogegh Rao > > > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional > > Charts > > > > which was not mentioned by KSK. > > > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KP > > > > and applies to all cusps > > > > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote: > > > Dear Members, > > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as > > per > > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very simple > > to > > > apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's > > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a > > Female > > > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > It is suggested that members please try this and > > inform > > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very > > practicable > > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > Yours sincerely, > > > lyrastro1 > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. > > > > --------- > > A.R.Raichur bombay > > anant_1608 > > raichuranant > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY > > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > --------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2005 Report Share Posted March 18, 2005 The first half (0 to 15 deg) of an odd Rashi is the Hora ruled by Sûrya. While the second half is the Hora of Candr. The reverse is true in the case of an even Rashi. First and second half of odd and even rashi is ruled by Sun respectively. First and second half of even and odd rashi is ruled by Moon respectively. --- shubarag <shubarag wrote: > > > > --Mr. Punit Pandey and Members, > > To try Balasekara's rule a planet's Sun hora or Moon > hora is to be > known. Can u explain how does one find out the the > planet's sun or > moon Hora. > > with Regards > SHUBARAG > > To tr- In , Punit Pandey > <punitp@g...> > wrote: > > Raichur ji, > > > > I disagree with your comments. We are using merely > the division and > > not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV > rule, it is also very > > unorthodox and similar to classical astrology > method of adding > values > > for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we > take a house or > group > > of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & > 11 for marriage. > > But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets > i.e. Rahu, Ketu and > > Saturn for determining the sex of child, which > seems not a KP way to > > me. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant > raichur > > <anant_1608> wrote: > > > Dear Yogegh Rao > > > > > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be > going into > Divisional > > > Charts > > > > > > which was not mentioned by KSK. > > > > > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of > KP > > > > > > and applies to all cusps > > > > > > > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote: > > > > Dear Members, > > > > Some time ago,I had > quoted Mr.A Balasekars > rule,as > > > per > > > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > 39-41.,which is > very simple > > > to > > > > apply,and I have experimented with it and > found it very > correct... > > > > " If the Vth cusp > sublord,or its starlord > is in Sun's > > > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's > hora then the child > is a > > > Female > > > > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > > It is suggested that > members please try > this and > > > inform > > > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at > a simple and very > > > practicable > > > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life > partneronline. > > > > > > --------- > > > A.R.Raichur bombay > > > anant_1608 > > > raichuranant > > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY > > > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > > --------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Small Business - Try our new resources > site! > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2005 Report Share Posted March 18, 2005 Dear Srinivasa, You could not be more right...! With best wishes, lyrastro1SRINIVASA UPADHYAYA <upadhyaya_p_s wrote: The first half (0 to 15 deg) of an odd Rashi is theHora ruled by Sûrya. While the second half is the Horaof Candr. The reverse is true in the case of an evenRashi.First and second half of odd and even rashi is ruledby Sun respectively.First and second half of even and odd rashi is ruledby Moon respectively.--- shubarag wrote:> > > > --Mr. Punit Pandey and Members,> > To try Balasekara's rule a planet's Sun hora or Moon> hora is to be > known. Can u explain how does one find out the the> planet's sun or > moon Hora. > > with Regards> SHUBARAG> > To tr- In , Punit Pandey> > wrote:> > Raichur ji,> > > > I disagree with your comments. We are using merely> the division and> > not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV> rule, it is also very> > unorthodox and similar to classical astrology> method of adding > values> > for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we> take a house or > group> > of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & > 11 for marriage.> > But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets> i.e. Rahu, Ketu and> > Saturn for determining the sex of child, which> seems not a KP way to> > me.> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant> raichur> > wrote:> > > Dear Yogegh Rao> > > > > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be> going into > Divisional> > > Charts> > > > > > which was not mentioned by KSK.> > > > > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of> KP> > > > > > and applies to all cusps> > > > > > > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi wrote:> > > > Dear Members,> > > > Some time ago,I had> quoted Mr.A Balasekars > rule,as> > > per> > > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp> 39-41.,which is > very simple> > > to> > > > apply,and I have experimented with it and> found it very > correct...> > > > "If the Vth cusp> sublord,or its starlord > is in Sun's> > > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's> hora then the child > is a> > > Female> > > > !" This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar...> > > > It is suggested that> members please try > this and> > > inform> > > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at> a simple and very> > > practicable> > > > and ACCURATE RULE...!> > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > lyrastro1> > > > GOOD LUCK !> > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life> partneronline.> > > > > > --------- > > > A.R.Raichur bombay> > > anant_1608 > > > raichuranant> > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY> > > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > > ---------> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Small Business - Try our new resources> site!> > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2005 Report Share Posted March 18, 2005 Sri Pandey, I tried the Hora principle and did not succeed. My birth details. 29-4-1942 7-15 a.m. Kakinada 16-57/82-13. 1st cusp : Venus-Moon-Moon-Sat.(10-32-24) Moon in Kanya: Mercury/Moon Star(hastha)19-55-33 5th cusp : Merc-Sun-Rahu-Mars . Rahu in Leo Sun/Venus(17-37-48),Sun in Aries ,Mars/venus(15-9-50) Star lord/Sub lord are both in Moon hora. However as per CKV, It was correct.Am I missing out on something? Son 11-7-1972 4-20p.m. Kakinada 16-57/82-13 Please guide me,thanks. Satish -- In , anant raichur <anant_1608> wrote: > Dear Mr Pandey > > Thank you for your comments. Go ahead and use the Hora Chart > > good luck > --- Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > > > > Raichur ji, > > > > I disagree with your comments. We are using merely the division and > > not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV rule, it is also very > > unorthodox and similar to classical astrology method of adding values > > for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we take a house or group > > of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & 11 for marriage. > > But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets i.e. Rahu, Ketu and > > Saturn for determining the sex of child, which seems not a KP way to > > me. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant raichur > > <anant_1608> wrote: > > > Dear Yogegh Rao > > > > > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be going into Divisional > > > Charts > > > > > > which was not mentioned by KSK. > > > > > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of KP > > > > > > and applies to all cusps > > > > > > > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote: > > > > Dear Members, > > > > Some time ago,I had quoted Mr.A Balasekars rule,as > > > per > > > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp 39-41.,which is very > > simple > > > to > > > > apply,and I have experimented with it and found it very correct... > > > > " If the Vth cusp sublord,or its starlord is in Sun's > > > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's hora then the child is a > > > Female > > > > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > > It is suggested that members please try this and > > > inform > > > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at a simple and very > > > practicable > > > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline. > > > > > > --------- > > > A.R.Raichur bombay > > > anant_1608 > > > raichuranant > > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY > > > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > > --------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2005 Report Share Posted March 19, 2005 -Dear Srinivasa upadhyaya, Thank you for the explanation & prompt reply SHUBARAG -- In , SRINIVASA UPADHYAYA <upadhyaya_p_s> wrote: > The first half (0 to 15 deg) of an odd Rashi is the > Hora ruled by Sûrya. While the second half is the Hora > of Candr. The reverse is true in the case of an even > Rashi. > > First and second half of odd and even rashi is ruled > by Sun respectively. > First and second half of even and odd rashi is ruled > by Moon respectively. > > > --- shubarag <shubarag> wrote: > > > > > > > > > --Mr. Punit Pandey and Members, > > > > To try Balasekara's rule a planet's Sun hora or Moon > > hora is to be > > known. Can u explain how does one find out the the > > planet's sun or > > moon Hora. > > > > with Regards > > SHUBARAG > > > > To tr- In , Punit Pandey > > <punitp@g...> > > wrote: > > > Raichur ji, > > > > > > I disagree with your comments. We are using merely > > the division and > > > not divisional charts. Even if you see the CKV > > rule, it is also very > > > unorthodox and similar to classical astrology > > method of adding > > values > > > for reaching to some conclusion. Also in KP, we > > take a house or > > group > > > of the house for determining some event e.g. 2,7 & > > 11 for marriage. > > > But in CKV rule, author is taking three planets > > i.e. Rahu, Ketu and > > > Saturn for determining the sex of child, which > > seems not a KP way to > > > me. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:07:59 -0800 (PST), anant > > raichur > > > <anant_1608> wrote: > > > > Dear Yogegh Rao > > > > > > > > The Balasekars rule may be tried, but we will be > > going into > > Divisional > > > > Charts > > > > > > > > which was not mentioned by KSK. > > > > > > > > The CKV is better, as it is within the realms of > > KP > > > > > > > > and applies to all cusps > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote: > > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > Some time ago,I had > > quoted Mr.A Balasekars > > rule,as > > > > per > > > > > his article in K.P. & Astrology,Annual,2000,Pp > > 39-41.,which is > > very simple > > > > to > > > > > apply,and I have experimented with it and > > found it very > > correct... > > > > > " If the Vth cusp > > sublord,or its starlord > > is in Sun's > > > > > hora,the sex of the child is male,if Moon's > > hora then the child > > is a > > > > Female > > > > > ! " This is the rule given by Mr.A Balasekar... > > > > > It is suggested that > > members please try > > this and > > > > inform > > > > > their experiences,in this forum...to arrive at > > a simple and very > > > > practicable > > > > > and ACCURATE RULE...! > > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > lyrastro1 > > > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Matrimony: Find your life > > partneronline. > > > > > > > > --------- > > > > A.R.Raichur bombay > > > > anant_1608 > > > > raichuranant > > > > USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY > > > > tel: 022-2506 2609 > > > > --------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Small Business - Try our new resources > > site! > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.