Dhasa Tracking System - A Tool To Prove 360 Or 365... A One More Detail

March 12, 2005

Dear Members,

Here You can See Some Details Of Dhasa Year Which Has Been Posted By

One Mr.Chandrasekaran And Mr. Graham In A Another Group...

Thanks To Them For The Detail Courtasy...

Only For Referance This Has Been Posted Here...

Regards,

S.N.Rajasekaran

An afterthought -- I don't think anyone disagrees about what

constitutes a day, the disagreement is about what constitutes a year

(for traditional astrological purposes). Your quote from the

Aitareya Brahmana may indeed help in this respect.

Graham

> Dear Graham,

> Jyotish has always considered a day to be from Sunrise to next

day's

> Sunrise, which is what is Savana day. There is no confusion about

what

> is to be treated as a day, so far as I know. The traditional time

> measurement of birth is on the basis of Ghatis past Sunrise. Then

it is

> said:

>

> " A year has 360 days, a year has 720 days and nights together. "

> /Aitareya Brahmana/ 7.17 (BJS vol. 1, p. 20.)

>

> Talking of Vedic Jyotish, I think, Aitareya Brahmana and Narada

Samhita

> have to be respected more.But one is free to have his own

interpretation

> of what should constitute a day.

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> Graham Fox wrote:

>

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar,

> > Thank you. I quite agree that that the savana year seems to work

> > better, and so I am currently using it, and no ancient sloka

> > anywhere specifically says to use " 365.24-and-a-bit " days. The

> > supporters of that year often quote the Phaladipika, which says

that

> > the year in ududasa should be calculated from the sidereal

return of

> > the Sun, and the days calculated therefrom (Phaladipika, 19.4).

> > Best wishes

> > Graham

> >

> > > Dear Graham,

> > > If you read the second line the name of the classic from which

the

> > > shloka is given is very clearly given. The shlokas are

> > from " Daivagya

> > > Vilas " , and what the shloka mentions is also very clear.

Similar

> > shloka

> > > is also there in Narada Samhita. Whether we follow it or not is

> > our own

> > > decision.

> > >

> > > But then if we think about it, where is the shloka that 365 and

> > odd day

> > > year should be used for predictions? Think about this.

> > > Chandrashekhar.

March 13, 2005

Dear Mr Rajasekaran,

"A tool to Prove 360 or 365"

This is not proof. This is just one school of thought on the subject.

With regards

Vaidun Vidyadhar 1 / 94 Marius Street Tamworth, NSW 2340 Australia Tel: 61-2-67 668428 (home) Mobile: 0414 870 083 Email: vvidya

S.N.Rajasekaran [snrajasekaran2004] Saturday, 12 March 2005 11:27 AM Subject: Re: Dhasa Tracking System - A Tool To Prove 360 Or 365... A One More Detail

Dear Members,Here You can See Some Details Of Dhasa Year Which Has Been Posted ByOne Mr.Chandrasekaran And Mr. Graham In A Another Group... Thanks To Them For The Detail Courtasy...Only For Referance This Has Been Posted Here...Regards, S.N.RajasekaranAn afterthought -- I don't think anyone disagrees about whatconstitutes a day, the disagreement is about what constitutes a year(for traditional astrological purposes). Your quote from theAitareya Brahmana may indeed help in this respect.Graham> Dear Graham,> Jyotish has always considered a day to be from Sunrise to nextday's> Sunrise, which is what is Savana day. There is no confusion aboutwhat> is to be treated as a day, so far as I know. The traditional time> measurement of birth is on the basis of Ghatis past Sunrise. Thenit is> said:>> "A year has 360 days, a year has 720 days and nights together."> /Aitareya Brahmana/ 7.17 (BJS vol. 1, p. 20.)>>> Talking of Vedic Jyotish, I think, Aitareya Brahmana and NaradaSamhita> have to be respected more.But one is free to have his owninterpretation> of what should constitute a day.> Chandrashekhar.>> Graham Fox wrote:>> >> > Dear Chandrashekhar,> > Thank you. I quite agree that that the savana year seems to work> > better, and so I am currently using it, and no ancient sloka> > anywhere specifically says to use "365.24-and-a-bit" days. The> > supporters of that year often quote the Phaladipika, which saysthat> > the year in ududasa should be calculated from the siderealreturn of> > the Sun, and the days calculated therefrom (Phaladipika, 19.4).> > Best wishes> > Graham> >> > > Dear Graham,> > > If you read the second line the name of the classic from whichthe> > > shloka is given is very clearly given. The shlokas are> > from "Daivagya> > > Vilas", and what the shloka mentions is also very clear.Similar> > shloka> > > is also there in Narada Samhita. Whether we follow it or not is> > our own> > > decision.> > >> > > But then if we think about it, where is the shloka that 365 and> > odd day> > > year should be used for predictions? Think about this.> > > Chandrashekhar.