ASPECTS OF NODES

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

 

1. As per KP, nodes are ever stronger than the planets conjoined

with them or aspected or the star lord or the depositor. Aspects of

nodes are not mentioned or applied in KP Readers, the same as

Maharishi Parashara or B. V. Raman. Aspects of nodes like Jupiter

are used by J. N. Bhasin, V. K. Choudhry and Sanjay Rath. Generally

nodes are treated as natural or functional (in SA) malefics which may

be different in KP. In reviewing current KP Annuals from 1999, one

astrologer is found mentioning Jupiter-like aspects of Rahu and

another one taking 7, 9 & 12 aspects of Ketu. In Sri Raichur and

KPAstro SWs the Hindu opposite aspect has been noticed.

 

http://www.jyotishvidya.com/nodes.htm

 

2. It is mentioned or applied aspects of nodes in

Astrosecrets, but in Part 1, p 312 it is said, " when a planet is

conjoined with Kethu, that planet is under the aspect of Rahu. For

this reason Kethu cannot act for the conjoined planet---Ketu will not

subject itself to several level matters, like that of Rahu while

offering results---but only to star deposit and as occupant of the

house " . But V. N. Krishna Rao says, " Regarding Rahu's aspects, it is

wrong to consider Rahu as aspecting the 7H. The 7H from Rahu is

itself Kethu with qualities distinctly of its own " . While Rahu

partakes of the qualities of Saturn, Kethu is considered to embody

the qualities of Mars. It is my experience that the trinal aspects of

Rahu are beneficial while the square aspects are particularly

harmful. Dominate role of Rahu or equal footing, which one will be

consistent with KP principles? (KP Reader III, Part 2, pp 123-124)

 

3. It is interesting to learn and discuss how the effects will

be explained with KP principles when Jupiter-like aspects of nodes

(without having physical body) are taken into consideration.

 

 

Best regards,

 

tw