Guest guest Posted February 22, 2005 Report Share Posted February 22, 2005 Dear sir, Ihave doubt regarding placement of planets near the cusps. Recentlyin a software when the cusp of 3rd house starts 17d 45m 40s and sun in 15de 40m 35s is it in 2nd house or in 3rd house as he conjucts 3rd bhava cusp in the software it is given sun in 3rd house eventhough its degrees are less than the 3rd cusp which is correct Sun in 2nd house or sun in 3rd house?.Lagna Makar. Nakshatramurthy R.V.Gopalan Bangalore dated 22-02-2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2005 Report Share Posted February 22, 2005 Dear Nakshatramurthy R.V.Gopalan, 1. Message #1590 (Our KP Group) anant raichur <anant_1608> Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:24 am Re: Re: KPBC2 The Difference In Latitude may be mathematically a diffrence. No one knows exactly the correct geographical latitude, and longitude of Birth Place. Is this going to affect the results?. Ultimately in KP we consider the Sign,Star,Sub lords for any prediction. So long as these do not change, the minor uncertainty about Latitude/Longitude does not matter. Another Mathmatical correctness is the House Occupied by a Planet. When the longitude of the Planet is slighly less than that of the cusp, the Planet is shown, in the previous house (mathematically correct). But, in actual practice this planet gives results as though it is in the next house. The star/sub lords will be same as the next cusp. So in prediction, ONE HAS TO CONSIDER the planet to be in the NEXT house,to what is shown mathamatically. 2. Message #2630 Footnote (1)In some cases significaotrs are adjusted as per " ORB Theory " which says a planet slightly (within 1 or 2 deg) behind the cusp of a house, gains the significance of the following house as though it is in the next house, and the effect is stronger if there is no other planet in the following house. (K.P. & ASTROLOGY, Year Book, 2000, pp 82-83; 2003, p 45 & 2005 p 61 and Raichur & KPAstro SWs) Best regards, tw , " rvgopalan27 " <rvgopalan27> wrote: > > Dear sir, > Ihave doubt regarding placement of planets near the cusps. Recentlyin > a software when the cusp of 3rd house starts 17d 45m 40s and sun in > 15de 40m 35s is it in 2nd house or in 3rd house as he conjucts 3rd > bhava cusp in the software it is given sun in 3rd house eventhough its > degrees are less than the 3rd cusp which is correct Sun in 2nd house > or sun in 3rd house?.Lagna Makar. > > Nakshatramurthy R.V.Gopalan > Bangalore > dated 22-02-2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2005 Report Share Posted February 23, 2005 dear rvgopalan27 Technically the Placemnt is strickly according to the degrees of the planet and the house cusp. However, practical experince shows that if the planet is very near the cusp, then it gives the results of the cusp. Mr raichur's SW allows for 3.3 deg (A nakshatra pada) based on his experience. other members will give their views and experience, and a common orb can be arrived at --- rvgopalan27 <rvgopalan27 wrote: > > > Dear sir, > Ihave doubt regarding placement of planets near the cusps. Recentlyin > a software when the cusp of 3rd house starts 17d 45m 40s and sun in > 15de 40m 35s is it in 2nd house or in 3rd house as he conjucts 3rd > bhava cusp in the software it is given sun in 3rd house eventhough its > degrees are less than the 3rd cusp which is correct Sun in 2nd house > or sun in 3rd house?.Lagna Makar. > > Nakshatramurthy R.V.Gopalan > Bangalore > dated 22-02-2005 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2005 Report Share Posted February 28, 2005 Dear Shri Anant Raichur, Regarding the common orb, it is found in a/ K.P. Year Book 2000, p 82, " 1 or 1 ½ deg " (T. Rajendra), b/ 2003, p 46, " 1 or 2 deg " (T. Rajendra Kumar), 2005, pp 61-62 , and c/ " 5 deg proximity " (C.V. Tyagaraja Iyer). While recalculating 20 charts in my review on houses for returning mother land (Msg #2630) by courtesy of KPAstro, the orb is noticed up to 3.1 deg for Sun in Putin's chart and 3.2 deg for Mercury in Nin's chart , perhaps more or less the same 3.3 deg, which may be reasonable with the understanding that the more influenec if the more nearer and the house is unoccupied and unaspected. Best regards, Tin Win , anant raichur <anant_1608> wrote: > dear rvgopalan27 > Technically the Placemnt is strickly according to the degrees of the planet and > the house cusp. However, practical experince shows that if the planet is very > near the cusp, then it gives the results of the cusp. Mr raichur's SW allows > for 3.3 deg (A nakshatra pada) based on his experience. other members will give > their views and experience, and a common orb can be arrived at > > --- rvgopalan27 <rvgopalan27> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > Ihave doubt regarding placement of planets near the cusps. Recentlyin > > a software when the cusp of 3rd house starts 17d 45m 40s and sun in > > 15de 40m 35s is it in 2nd house or in 3rd house as he conjucts 3rd > > bhava cusp in the software it is given sun in 3rd house eventhough its > > degrees are less than the 3rd cusp which is correct Sun in 2nd house > > or sun in 3rd house?.Lagna Makar. > > > > Nakshatramurthy R.V.Gopalan > > Bangalore > > dated 22-02-2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2005 Report Share Posted February 28, 2005 dera tw853 thanks for the study. It confirms my assumption that ord would be upto 3.3. deg --- tw853 <tw853 wrote: > > > Dear Shri Anant Raichur, > > Regarding the common orb, it is found in a/ K.P. Year Book 2000, p > 82, " 1 or 1 ½ deg " (T. Rajendra), b/ 2003, p 46, " 1 or 2 deg " (T. > Rajendra Kumar), 2005, pp 61-62 , and c/ " 5 deg proximity " (C.V. > Tyagaraja Iyer). While recalculating 20 charts in my review on > houses for returning mother land (Msg #2630) by courtesy of KPAstro, > the orb is noticed up to 3.1 deg for Sun in Putin's chart and 3.2 deg > for Mercury in Nin's chart , perhaps more or less the same 3.3 deg, > which may be reasonable with the understanding that the more > influenec if the more nearer and the house is unoccupied and > unaspected. > > Best regards, > > Tin Win > > > > , anant raichur <anant_1608> > wrote: > > dear rvgopalan27 > > Technically the Placemnt is strickly according to the degrees of > the planet and > > the house cusp. However, practical experince shows that if the > planet is very > > near the cusp, then it gives the results of the cusp. Mr raichur's > SW allows > > for 3.3 deg (A nakshatra pada) based on his experience. other > members will give > > their views and experience, and a common orb can be arrived at > > > > --- rvgopalan27 <rvgopalan27> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > Ihave doubt regarding placement of planets near the cusps. > Recentlyin > > > a software when the cusp of 3rd house starts 17d 45m 40s and sun > in > > > 15de 40m 35s is it in 2nd house or in 3rd house as he conjucts 3rd > > > bhava cusp in the software it is given sun in 3rd house > eventhough its > > > degrees are less than the 3rd cusp which is correct Sun in 2nd > house > > > or sun in 3rd house?.Lagna Makar. > > > > > > Nakshatramurthy R.V.Gopalan > > > Bangalore > > > dated 22-02-2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.