KPBC9 - - - Sid Time ?

[Guest guest]

Dear AMIT,

 

 

As per Krishnamurti's Nirayana Emphemeris, 1951-1960 by Maharbala, p

63 --

 

Sid Time @5-30 AM IST @ 82E30 on 22-05-1951 -- 21h-25m-16s

 

ST @00hr @ Greenwitch --- 15-55-16 (1)

 

 

As per KP Reader I, pp 38-39,

 

For 77W37, 77-37/60 x 4 min = 5h-10m-28s

GMT for 14-55 PM in Rochester -- 18-55

 

Interval between midnight and BOT LMT = 18-55 minus 5-10-28

= 13-44-32 (2)

 

 

 

Sid Time @00hr on 2-05-1951 15-55-16 (1)

77-37/60 x 2/3 sec 00-00-52

Interval btw midnight & TOB 13-44-32 (2)

Correction 10 sec per hr 00-02-17

 

Sid Time (by adding above 4) 05-42-57

 

Note: 3 sec difference is missing somewhere.

 

 

Best regards,

 

tw

 

 

 

, amit dubey <dubeyamitkumar>

wrote:

> Hi

> please tell how do u get ST 5-42-54 whereas even rough

calculation may lead it beyond 6hr as I got which is explained below

> ST for 22 may is -- 3hr 57 min42 sec

> LMT is -- 2hr 58min

54sec (because 77w37 longitude gives +3 min 54 sec coreection to get

LMT )

> Others corrections like years correction or correction to indian

sid time or others which may hardly makes difference upto some min

are not taken into consideration here for illustration purpose. Since

birth time is after noon ,the above mentioned two values will be

added which will be fairly near to 6hr 45min approximately.

> Again that amount of ST will suggest ascendent near about 15 virgo.

> I would like to be pointed out where am i

wrong ,why I am not getting 3 virgo ascendent even by manually and

not by horosoft and horoscope explorer software which i have .

>

Thanks with Regards

>

AMIT

>

> tw853 <tw853> wrote:

>

> Dear AMIT,

>

> As per New KPA 23-05-18 and ST 5-42-54, Vir Asc longitude is as

> follows. (22-05-1951, 2-55 PM, GMT-4hr, Rochester, NY, US, 43N09,

> 77W37)

>

>

> SW-------D--M-S

> KPAstro 3-35-55

> JHL 3-35-55 (Jannath Hora Light)

> Astro 3-35-55 (Astrodienst)

> SJS 3-35-53 (Shri Jyoti Star 5)

> JJyotish 3-35-42(Junior Jyotish)

> Astraura 3-35-31

> Raichur 3-35-26

>

> Best regards,

>

> tw

>

>

> , amit dubey <dubeyamitkumar>

> wrote:

> > Hi

> > Still I am not able to get 3 virgo ascendent ,I

> have checked with other software also but getting same value 15

virgo

> for ascendent.Let me clear

> > 1- When you are talking 3 virgo do u use sayana or niryana term

> > 2- whether 3 virgo is starting point or mid point of first cusp

> >

> > I would like to get suggestions from other

people

> also especially kanak who sent answer .How are you getting 3 virgo

> ascendent for the given data.I might have got 3 virgo ascendent

only

> if 01:55 DOB is used.

> > please assist me .

>

>

> Thanks with Regards

>

>

> AMIT

> >

> > rongaunt <rongaunt@b...> wrote:

> >

> > Amit,

> >

> > 3 Virgo 35' 43 " is the correct Ascendant. The ayanamsa is

> > 23:05:17 for 1951. Looks like you have put in 1957 by mistake.

> >

> > Ron Gaunt

> >

> >

> >

> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 06:54:00 +0000, you wrote:

> >

> > >HELLO

> > > I am getting ascendent 15virgo12'23'' instead

of

> 3 virgo 35'43'' as mentioned by you for the given corresponding

> details of native.I am using horosoft software in which ayanamsa is

> used 23:10:43.Why is the discreepancy occuring .plz suggest

> >

>

> Thanks with Regards

> >

>

>

> AMIT

> > >

> > >rongaunt <rongaunt@b...> wrote:

> > >

> > >Data for this weeks KPBC is as follows:

> > >

> > >Male

> > >DOB 22nd May 1951

> > >02:55 pm EDT +4.00

> > >Rochester, New York

> > >43N09'17 " 077W36'57 "

> > >

> > >Ascendant 3 Virgo 35' 43 " Geocentric angles.

> > >

> > >What happened on 17th October 1977? was it?

> > >

> > >1. Murdered first victim?

> > >

> > >2. Took monastic vows?

> > >

> > >3. Fell down steps and broke both legs?

> > >

> > >4. Dismissed on the spot by employer for sexual

> > > misconduct when caught in the act with employer's

> > > daughter?

> > >

> > >

> > >Please submit assessments by Fri 00:00am

> > >18th Feb 05 after which the answer will be provided.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >Ron Gaunt

> > >

> > >

> > >