Aspects

[Guest guest]

Kanak,

Isn't sign-to-sign aspect less common in KP? I have read that KSK does

consider sign-based aspects (as in Traditional system) in some places,

(e.g. to consider the influence of Saturn in the context of delay in

marriage, and the nodes being agents of planets they are conjoined

with in the same sign), but I thought this wasn't the norm. He

appeared to stress western aspects.

 

In my conversation with some senior KP astrologers, I have heard that

we should consider both sign-to-sign and western aspects. One majority

opinion is to use the rule " Planets A and B are conjoined if they are

in the same sign " .

 

I am not clear about the aspects part of KP. Is this a topic worthy of

greater focus in this group? Stalwarts, please help.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

, " Kanakkumar Bosmia "

<kanbosastro@h...> wrote:

>