Guest guest Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Hello everyone, Regarding my earlier posting on Ayanamsa standardization, etc., I followed Shri.Raichur's suggestion that I should check if the sublords changed when the ayanamsa changed. I did this experiment using our software (KPAstro) and in all the four random cases I had listed earlier, the sublords of cusps did not change (I did not check planeteary sublords). My thanks to Raichur. Of course, as has been pointed out, in some borderline cases this could change. If I come across such cases, I will gladly bring to this group's attention. Is there some kind of a FAQ or reference document that this group has published here that could benefit new comers to the group to study before posting their questions? I am sure this issue (as well as that of the Dasa period) will come up again in future. Publishing findings of this group or important ideas endorsed by this group at an easily accessible place will help beginners. As part of my study, I am collecting information from various sources available to me on various aspects of KP. One of the tasks I undertook sometime ago was to collect information on the definition of Ruling Planets, a very important element of KP. I noticed differing ideas given by various people. If this group is interested, I will be happy to make it available for members to read and comment upon. I believe common agreement helps in bringing accuracy and rigour to this discipline (some controversy is unavoidable in this process). Once there is some consensus, the revised document could be made available to everyone, so that new comers won't be confused the way I am. If there are other members who are embarking on a similar exercise, I will be happy to be of assistance in any way I can. Finally, I have another basic question (although Shri.Raichur answered this in private a few months ago, I am posting it for others' opinion and benefit): Is there any difference between the terms " connection " and " signification " ? More precisely, what do we mean when we say that a planet is connected to a house, or a planet is connected to another planet? In my reading I have seen that in some cases the term " connection " is used interchangeably with " signification " , and in some cases, the meaning is not the same. Regards, Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, I am interested in having the information you collected on rulin Planets.It will certainly add/confirm my ideas. Sunil D.Joshi. --- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: > > Hello everyone, > Regarding my earlier posting on Ayanamsa > standardization, etc., I > followed Shri.Raichur's suggestion that I should > check if the > sublords changed when the ayanamsa changed. I did > this experiment > using our software (KPAstro) and in all the four > random cases I had > listed earlier, the sublords of cusps did not change > (I did not > check planeteary sublords). My thanks to Raichur. Of > course, as has > been pointed out, in some borderline cases this > could change. If I > come across such cases, I will gladly bring to this > group's > attention. > > Is there some kind of a FAQ or reference document > that this group > has published here that could benefit new comers to > the group to > study before posting their questions? I am sure this > issue (as well > as that of the Dasa period) will come up again in > future. Publishing > findings of this group or important ideas endorsed > by this group at > an easily accessible place will help beginners. > > As part of my study, I am collecting information > from various > sources available to me on various aspects of KP. > One of the tasks I > undertook sometime ago was to collect information on > the definition > of Ruling Planets, a very important element of KP. I > noticed > differing ideas given by various people. If this > group is > interested, I will be happy to make it available for > members to read > and comment upon. I believe common agreement helps > in bringing > accuracy and rigour to this discipline (some > controversy is > unavoidable in this process). Once there is some > consensus, the > revised document could be made available to > everyone, so that new > comers won't be confused the way I am. If there are > other members > who are embarking on a similar exercise, I will be > happy to be of > assistance in any way I can. > > Finally, I have another basic question (although > Shri.Raichur > answered this in private a few months ago, I am > posting it for > others' opinion and benefit): Is there any > difference between the > terms " connection " and " signification " ? More > precisely, what do we > mean when we say that a planet is connected to a > house, or a planet > is connected to another planet? In my reading I have > seen that in > some cases the term " connection " is used > interchangeably > with " signification " , and in some cases, the meaning > is not the same. > > Regards, > Rangarajan > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, I too would like a copy please Ron Gaunt On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:44:57 -0800, you wrote: > > >Dear Rangarajan, >I am interested in having the information you >collected on rulin Planets.It will certainly >add/confirm my ideas. >Sunil D.Joshi. >--- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga >wrote: > >> >> Hello everyone, >> Regarding my earlier posting on Ayanamsa >> standardization, etc., I >> followed Shri.Raichur's suggestion that I should >> check if the >> sublords changed when the ayanamsa changed. I did >> this experiment >> using our software (KPAstro) and in all the four >> random cases I had >> listed earlier, the sublords of cusps did not change >> (I did not >> check planeteary sublords). My thanks to Raichur. Of >> course, as has >> been pointed out, in some borderline cases this >> could change. If I >> come across such cases, I will gladly bring to this >> group's >> attention. >> >> Is there some kind of a FAQ or reference document >> that this group >> has published here that could benefit new comers to >> the group to >> study before posting their questions? I am sure this >> issue (as well >> as that of the Dasa period) will come up again in >> future. Publishing >> findings of this group or important ideas endorsed >> by this group at >> an easily accessible place will help beginners. >> >> As part of my study, I am collecting information >> from various >> sources available to me on various aspects of KP. >> One of the tasks I >> undertook sometime ago was to collect information on >> the definition >> of Ruling Planets, a very important element of KP. I >> noticed >> differing ideas given by various people. If this >> group is >> interested, I will be happy to make it available for >> members to read >> and comment upon. I believe common agreement helps >> in bringing >> accuracy and rigour to this discipline (some >> controversy is >> unavoidable in this process). Once there is some >> consensus, the >> revised document could be made available to >> everyone, so that new >> comers won't be confused the way I am. If there are >> other members >> who are embarking on a similar exercise, I will be >> happy to be of >> assistance in any way I can. >> >> Finally, I have another basic question (although >> Shri.Raichur >> answered this in private a few months ago, I am >> posting it for >> others' opinion and benefit): Is there any >> difference between the >> terms " connection " and " signification " ? More >> precisely, what do we >> mean when we say that a planet is connected to a >> house, or a planet >> is connected to another planet? In my reading I have >> seen that in >> some cases the term " connection " is used >> interchangeably >> with " signification " , and in some cases, the meaning >> is not the same. >> >> Regards, >> Rangarajan >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Dear Rangarajan , connection With planet :- For example We study bout MER 's connection with MAR If MER is in Mesha or Vrischik or MER is in star of MAR or MER is conj. with MAR or aspected by MAR then MER connected with planet MAR. Connection with cusp. For exampale we check connection betwin MER and 6th cusp (1) MER is Lord of 6th or starlord of 6th cusp or Sub lord of 6th cusp. or (2)MER is in 6th cusp. or (3) Mer aspect 6th cusp. or (4) MER is in staror sub of planet who is in 6th cusp or (5) MER is in star or sub of lord of 6th cusp. or (6) MER is aspected or Conj. with lord of 6th cusp. We all know the significator so i dont give any details. I hpoe i have clear you doubt between connection and significator. regards kanak bosmia >"Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" <ranga > > > Ayanamsa, etc. - Differences >Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:32:42 -0000 > > >Hello everyone, >Regarding my earlier posting on Ayanamsa standardization, etc., I >followed Shri.Raichur's suggestion that I should check if the >sublords changed when the ayanamsa changed. I did this experiment >using our software (KPAstro) and in all the four random cases I had >listed earlier, the sublords of cusps did not change (I did not >check planeteary sublords). My thanks to Raichur. Of course, as has >been pointed out, in some borderline cases this could change. If I >come across such cases, I will gladly bring to this group's >attention. > >Is there some kind of a FAQ or reference document that this group >has published here that could benefit new comers to the group to >study before posting their questions? I am sure this issue (as well >as that of the Dasa period) will come up again in future. Publishing >findings of this group or important ideas endorsed by this group at >an easily accessible place will help beginners. > >As part of my study, I am collecting information from various >sources available to me on various aspects of KP. One of the tasks I >undertook sometime ago was to collect information on the definition >of Ruling Planets, a very important element of KP. I noticed >differing ideas given by various people. If this group is >interested, I will be happy to make it available for members to read >and comment upon. I believe common agreement helps in bringing >accuracy and rigour to this discipline (some controversy is >unavoidable in this process). Once there is some consensus, the >revised document could be made available to everyone, so that new >comers won't be confused the way I am. If there are other members >who are embarking on a similar exercise, I will be happy to be of >assistance in any way I can. > >Finally, I have another basic question (although Shri.Raichur >answered this in private a few months ago, I am posting it for >others' opinion and benefit): Is there any difference between the >terms "connection" and "signification"? More precisely, what do we >mean when we say that a planet is connected to a house, or a planet >is connected to another planet? In my reading I have seen that in >some cases the term "connection" is used interchangeably >with "signification", and in some cases, the meaning is not the same. > >Regards, >Rangarajan > > > Find just what you're after with the new, more precise MSN Search - try it now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, Allow me to compliment you for possessing an inquiring mind,and the patience and "stick-it-to-it-iveness" to pursue this kind of research... With best wishes, Yours sincerely, lyrastro1 GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Hello everyone,Regarding my earlier posting on Ayanamsa standardization, etc., I followed Shri.Raichur's suggestion that I should check if the sublords changed when the ayanamsa changed. I did this experiment using our software (KPAstro) and in all the four random cases I had listed earlier, the sublords of cusps did not change (I did not check planeteary sublords). My thanks to Raichur. Of course, as has been pointed out, in some borderline cases this could change. If I come across such cases, I will gladly bring to this group's attention.Is there some kind of a FAQ or reference document that this group has published here that could benefit new comers to the group to study before posting their questions? I am sure this issue (as well as that of the Dasa period) will come up again in future. Publishing findings of this group or important ideas endorsed by this group at an easily accessible place will help beginners.As part of my study, I am collecting information from various sources available to me on various aspects of KP. One of the tasks I undertook sometime ago was to collect information on the definition of Ruling Planets, a very important element of KP. I noticed differing ideas given by various people. If this group is interested, I will be happy to make it available for members to read and comment upon. I believe common agreement helps in bringing accuracy and rigour to this discipline (some controversy is unavoidable in this process). Once there is some consensus, the revised document could be made available to everyone, so that new comers won't be confused the way I am. If there are other members who are embarking on a similar exercise, I will be happy to be of assistance in any way I can.Finally, I have another basic question (although Shri.Raichur answered this in private a few months ago, I am posting it for others' opinion and benefit): Is there any difference between the terms "connection" and "signification"? More precisely, what do we mean when we say that a planet is connected to a house, or a planet is connected to another planet? In my reading I have seen that in some cases the term "connection" is used interchangeably with "signification", and in some cases, the meaning is not the same.Regards,Rangarajan India Matrimony: Find your life partner online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.