RECTIFICATION OF TIME OF BIRTH

[Guest guest]

Dear Friends

 

Will someone enlighten me on the RULE "the sub-lord of the Asc must be the Star Lord of the MOON. "

 

The Moon remains in one Nakstra for nearly 2 days. Thus the Moons star lord does not change in these 2 days. According to the RULE, all births in this two day period should have the SAME SUB. This is not at all logical. I for one do not use this rule.

 

good luck

Ravinder Grover <astrology wrote:

 

Dear all

 

Help required to Rectify TOB, as follows:

 

 

 

Date of Query: 5th October 2004, 18:32:23 hours, NZDST, Auckland, New Zealand

Query: Rectify TOB if required?

Date of Birth: 8th Oct 1958, Recorded time of Birth : 00:01 am, Place: New Delhi , India

This gives Lagna as Gemini 28deg 21 min 36 sec ruled by Merc, Jup, Ven, Merc

and Mon at Cancer 11 deg 35 min 7 sec, ruled by Mon, Sat, Mon, Sat

To rectify TOB, as per rule, Sub Lord Cusp(1) should be same as Moon's Star Lord

Here Sub Lord Cusp(1) = VENUS and Star Lord of Moon is SAT

To get SLC(1) = Sat, Lagna should be moved to

 

either at Gemini 21-46-40 to 23-53-20 è that is, Rectified TOB should be 23.46 hours on 7th October 1958

OR Cancer 3-20-00 to 5-26-40 è that is, Rectified TOB should be 11:25 hours

Question is : Which is the right TOB?

Love

 

Ravinder GRover

 

 

 

 

 

 

--------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608

raichuranant

USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 ---------

Meet the all-new My – Try it today!

[Guest guest]

Kanak,

 

Would you mind giving us an example so that we can follow it more

closely. Thanks

 

 

Ron Gaunt

 

>Dear Ravindra

 

> i dont think it is right method to check birth timeV pls refer Book " SECRETS

OF R.P. & THE BIRTH TIME By: K.Baskaran Publishe KRISHMAN & CO 804 Mount Road,

Chhennai 600 002 "

 

>according to him RP MOON = Bith Asc. and RP Asc. = Birth Moon.( ksk himself

wrote in any one reader about RP Moon = Birth Asc. but i dont remember no: and

Page No.)

 

>frist you go up to birth Mon Sub-Sub-Sub level . and calcutet asc for that

time you can found Bith asc as RP MOON most of case.

 

>i found very accuret result by this method. and it is my personal view .

 

>kanak bosmia

[Guest guest]

ron,

Sure

i will post today nigh most brobably

regards

kanak bosmia

>rongaunt <rongaunt

>

>

> RECTIFICATION OF TIME OF BIRTH

>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:46:24 +1000

>

>

>Kanak,

>

>Would you mind giving us an example so that we can follow it more

>closely. Thanks

>

>

>Ron Gaunt

>

> >Dear Ravindra

>

> > i dont think it is right method to check birth timeV pls refer Book " SECRETS OF R.P. & THE BIRTH TIME By: K.Baskaran Publishe KRISHMAN & CO 804 Mount Road, Chhennai 600 002 "

>

> >according to him RP MOON = Bith Asc. and RP Asc. = Birth Moon.( ksk himself wrote in any one reader about RP Moon = Birth Asc. but i dont remember no: and Page No.)

>

> >frist you go up to birth Mon Sub-Sub-Sub level . and calcutet asc for that time you can found Bith asc as RP MOON most of case.

>

> >i found very accuret result by this method. and it is my personal view .

>

> >kanak bosmia

>

>

Download the new MSN Toolbar Suite – now you can search your PC, too!

[Guest guest]

Dear Yogesh Rao Lajmi,

 

What I mean is to take mother may be okay.

 

Best regards,

 

tw

, Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1>

wrote:

> Dear tw853,

> Truly,I admire your " stick-to-it-iveness " , we are

discussing the use of astrological prognosis,precisely to avoid the

need for all these expensive tests modern-day-tests... ? !

> With best wishes,

> lyrastro1

>

> tw853 <tw853> wrote:

>

> Dear Yogesh Rao Lajmi,

>

> Yes, I got an idea, from the view point of ultra sound test for

> child's sex only mother can be taken.

>

> Best regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Yogesh Rao Lajmi,

> >

> > It's K Baskaran's view referring to some kind of practical

> scientific

> > test like DNA which has a logical reasoning for food for thought.

> >

> >

> > Best regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> >

> >

> > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi

> <lyrastro1>

> > wrote:

> > > Dear tw853,

> > > The father's horoscope can be taken,provided

one

> > is certain that the person whose horoscope you are analysing,is

the

> > true father,and that he has impregnated the mother,which fact,

only

> > the mother knows for sure, and can vouch for...Isn't it ?

> > > That is the only reason why the mother's

chart

> is

> > more logical...and rational to consider,in case of child-birth...

> > > Personally I feel that there is no need to

> > stretch this point to this extent,unless the father is considered

> so

> > very important,( male chavinism at work ?,) but truly speaking

> > scientifically the male " officially married to " ,and hence called

> the

> > husband,and assumed to be the father of the child of the

> woman " he

> > married " ,need not necessarily be the father of the child...only

the

> > woman

> > > can vouch for paternity...!

> > > And that,dear tw, is an incontrovertible

> > scientific fact !

> > > With best wishes,

> > > lyrastro1

> > >

> > >

> > > tw853 <tw853> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Kanakkumar Bosmia,

> > >

> > >

> > > 1. Some interesting points in K Baskaran's book among

> others,

> > > importance of Moon, correctness of KPA, Raichur Emphem,

dogmatic

> > > approach, decisive role of father's horoscope in deciding the

sex

> > of

> > > child because the male sperms determines the sex of child.

> > >

> > > 2. Perhaps it's Rectification of Birth Time, KP Reader

III,

> p

> > > 317-329, to refer KP Reader. In p 325, inter-link of the time

of

> > > birth and --- the moment of query are understandable from a

> horary

> > > horoscope erected according to Varaha Mihira's Brihat Jataka ---

 

> no

> > > second opinion, lord of the sign in which Moon is --- and lord

of

> > the

> > > Lagna--- will be the same ------

> > >

> > >

> > > Best regards,

> > >

> > > tw

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , " Kanakkumar Bosmia "

> > > <kanbosastro@h...> wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Ron Gaunt,

 

I'm thinkig you may be interested to check your birth time and would

like to send you one copy free if you don't mine to send any mail

adrress for you to my private e-mail. It will reach within one week.

By mistake they sent me two copies, of course charging two times.

 

Best regards,

 

tw

 

, rongaunt <rongaunt@b...> wrote:

>

> Kanak,

>

> Would you mind giving us an example so that we can follow it more

> closely. Thanks

>

>

> Ron Gaunt

>

> >Dear Ravindra

>

> > i dont think it is right method to check birth timeV pls refer

Book " SECRETS OF R.P. & THE BIRTH TIME By: K.Baskaran Publishe

KRISHMAN & CO 804 Mount Road, Chhennai 600 002 "

>

> >according to him RP MOON = Bith Asc. and RP Asc. = Birth Moon.(

ksk himself wrote in any one reader about RP Moon = Birth Asc. but i

dont remember no: and Page No.)

>

> >frist you go up to birth Mon Sub-Sub-Sub level . and calcutet asc

for that time you can found Bith asc as RP MOON most of case.

>

> >i found very accuret result by this method. and it is my personal

view .

>

> >kanak bosmia

[Guest guest]

Dear tw853,

Thank you for your prompt reply...

Yours sincerely,

lyrastro1

GOOD LUCK !

tw853 <tw853 wrote:

Dear Yogesh Rao Lajmi,What I mean is to take mother may be okay.Best regards,tw , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote:> Dear tw853,> Truly,I admire your "stick-to-it-iveness", we are discussing the use of astrological prognosis,precisely to avoid the need for all these expensive tests modern-day-tests... ? !> With best wishes,> lyrastro1> > tw853 <tw853> wrote: > > Dear Yogesh Rao Lajmi,> > Yes, I got an idea, from

the view point of ultra sound test for > child's sex only mother can be taken. > > Best regards,> > tw> > , "tw853" <tw853> wrote:> > > > Dear Yogesh Rao Lajmi,> > > > It's K Baskaran's view referring to some kind of practical > scientific > > test like DNA which has a logical reasoning for food for thought.> > > > > > Best regards,> > > > tw> > > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > <lyrastro1> > > wrote:> > > Dear tw853,> > > The father's horoscope can be taken,provided one > > is certain that the person whose horoscope you are analysing,is

the > > true father,and that he has impregnated the mother,which fact, only > > the mother knows for sure, and can vouch for...Isn't it ?> > > That is the only reason why the mother's chart > is > > more logical...and rational to consider,in case of child-birth...> > > Personally I feel that there is no need to > > stretch this point to this extent,unless the father is considered > so > > very important,( male chavinism at work ?,) but truly speaking > > scientifically the male "officially married to",and hence called > the > > husband,and assumed to be the father of the child of the > woman "he > >

married",need not necessarily be the father of the child...only the > > woman> > > can vouch for paternity...! > > > And that,dear tw, is an incontrovertible > > scientific fact !> > > With best wishes,> > > lyrastro1> > > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853> wrote:> > > > > > Dear Kanakkumar Bosmia,> > > > > > > > >

1. Some interesting points in K Baskaran's book among > others, > > > importance of Moon, correctness of KPA, Raichur Emphem, dogmatic > > > approach, decisive role of father's horoscope in deciding the sex > > of > > > child because the male sperms determines the sex of child. > > > > > > 2. Perhaps it's Rectification of Birth Time, KP Reader III, > p > > > 317-329, to refer KP Reader. In p 325, inter-link of the time of > > > birth and --- the moment of query are understandable from a > horary > > > horoscope erected according to Varaha Mihira's Brihat Jataka ---> no > > > second opinion, lord of the sign in which Moon is --- and lord of > > the > > > Lagna--- will be the same ------> > > > >

> > > > Best regards,> > > > > > tw> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Kanakkumar Bosmia" > > > <kanbosastro@h...> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >