Guest guest Posted November 21, 2004 Report Share Posted November 21, 2004 Dear Sandy Crowther, Pl try http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/index.htm Best regards, tw , " Sandy Crowther " <sandy@t...> wrote: > Thanks TW, > > > > If I'm not mistaken, I believe that the first 2 URL's you listed below > are those of Andrew Lynn's (logbags) website, which appears to now be > out of commission and off the web - however the 3rd URL is a very well > written article. You are well researched when it comes to being a source > of information on KP.:-) So thanks again. > > > > All the Best, > > Sandy Crowther > > <http://www.jupitersweb.com> http://www.jupitersweb.com > > > > > > > > tw853 [tw853] > Friday, November 19, 2004 10:48 AM > > Re: KPBC2 > > > > > Dear Sandy Crowther, > > 1.Rules of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati > > (including about Richard Houck who declared George W. Bush > President , commenting in one year advance of the elction that Bush's > victory was the strangest win pattern he had never seen. His follower > Christopher Kevil also correctly predicted re-election of Presedent > Bush. Also a marginal test case of softwares to get Jupiter / Moon / > Saturn, --- Saturn antara dasa at his death.) > > http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id35.htm > > > 2. Ruling Planets in KP By Dr Satya Prakash Chowdhary > > > http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id39.htm > > 3. IN DEFENSE OF KRISHNAMURTI PADHDHATI RAGHUNATH REBUTTAL > By Sat Siri Khalsa > > > http://www.Vedic Astrology.org/krishnamurti.htm > > > Best regards, > > tw > > > , " Sandy Crowther " <sandy@t...> > wrote: > > Dear TW, Vidyadhar, and Ron, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the warm welcome. > > > > > > > > I look forward to learning all about the KP System (as time > permits) - > > and perhaps this list will be a great place to start. I had > purchased (a > > while back) all 6 KP Readers, and hope to start investigating them > > thoroughly very soon, and eventually adding KP to my repertoire of > > astrological systems. So forgive me if I lurk for a while, while > trying > > to digest at least the basics of the system, which I am not totally > > familiar with as of yet. If there is a KP overview written up > anywhere - > > please direct me to it. > > > > > > > > A few (amateur) comments about KPBC2: > > > > > > > > With the heavy involvement of the dasha planets leading straight > back to > > significations of the 2nd house, and the 2nd house being highly > > significant for at least three of the four selections (marriage, > birth, > > and job related activities given in the options listed in the blind > > chart choices), I will be very interested in the KP systematic > > delineation process that leads one to conclude the correct event at > play > > on Nov. 2, 1979.So I hope that those who are correct in their > answer are > > prepared to delineate the " KP way " on list for the benefit of those > > wanting to learn the analytical process involved with KP > > delineations.Thanks! > > > > > > > > All the Best, > > > > Sandy Crowther > > > > <http://www.jupitersweb.com> http://www.jupitersweb.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rongaunt [rongaunt@b...] > > Thursday, November 18, 2004 5:23 PM > > > > Re: KPBC2 > > > > > > > > > > Sandy, > > > > Great to see you on this List. Don't worry about being new to > > KP, so am I and possibly many others. It should be a great > > place to learn. > > > > Regarding you settings they seem almost spot on. I have > > programmed GJ with the table and it comes up with 23:04:56 > > within 2 " of your calculation. > > > > We have recently had discussions on this List regarding > > calculating the Asc and I have realized that most Western > > authored software programs use GEOGRAPHICAL angles and > > GEOCENTRIC planetary positions. Mr Raichur's program which > > appears to be used by many of our Indian colleagues, converts the > > geographical angles to geocentric. This means that there is a > > slight difference between the Ascendants and house cusps. > > In KPBC2 our Western astrology programs shows - as you state - an > > Asc of around 12 Scorpio 17, but using Geocentric angles the > > Ascendant is 12Scorpio08:14. This difference will only be an > > issue when the Asc falls very close to the cusp of the subs, and > > in most cases will give the same data. The dasa sequence is as > > you stated for the event. > > > > The only Western produced program that appears to have an option > > to convert to Geocentric angles that I know is Solar Fire. I > > have mailed Parashara Light with suggestions to include this - > > and parallax in any future upgrade. > > > > > > Ron Gaunt > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:37:03 -0500, you wrote: > > > > >Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > >I'm new to this group and new to KP, but not so new to Astrology. > > >Anyway, I have a few concerns about the " corrected " KP Ayanamsa > posted > > >below in light of the new KP Table posted for the years 1900 to > 2052. > > >(Thanks for that Table from tw853 - didn't catch your name - sorry > > :-)). > > > > > > > > > > > >Please enlighten me if my logic is fuzzy.According to my > calculations > > >with respect to the new Table posted for the KP Ayanamsa (which I > am > > >trying to get straight once and for all), the correct KP Ayanamsa > for > > >KPBC2 for December 20th, 1950 is actually 23:04:58. This figure was > > >derived from re-setting the KP Ayanamsa in SJS (Shri Jyoti Star5) > to > > >reflect the values posted in the email and Table that followed. If > for > > >April 15th 1950 the ayanamsa is 23:04:22, and the ayanamsa for > April > > >15th 1951 is 23:05:13, I do NOT see how the correct ayanamsa for > > >December 20th 1950 can be anything other than 23:04:58. This > ayanamsa > > >give a lagna of 12 Scorpio 17, and a dasha sequence of Mo Me Ju Ke > for > > >the date in question: November 2, 1979. > > > > > > > > > > > >If anyone uses SJS and is interested in how I derived at this > corrected > > >(I believe?) KP ayanamsa based on the Table posted earlier - I went > > into > > >the SJS Global Options set for the KP Ayanamsa and did a Custom > setting > > >to reflect the accuracy based on the new Table given in the > previous > > >email. I left the setting on KP and then custom set the Epoch to > > January > > >1, 1900, custom set the Value at Epoch to 22:22:16 (to reflect the > KP > > >ayanamsa for Jan 1, 1900), and then custom set the Annual > Precession to > > >50:2388475. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the Best, > > > > > > Sandy Crowther > > > > > > <http://www.jupitersweb.com> http://www.jupitersweb.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >rongaunt [rongaunt@b...] > > >Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:32 AM > > > > > >Re: KPBC2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sorry again. Typing error in last message. Ayanamsa should > > >have read 22:22:30 NOT 2:22:30 > > > > > >Ron Gaunt > > > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:25:08 +1000, you wrote: > > > > > >> > > >>Anant, > > >> > > >>Sorry, that was a bit misleading. I should have stated that > > >>ayanamsa 2:22:30 was for circa 1900. I think you will find the > > >>Asc is in fact correct. > > >> > > >>Ron Gaunt > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:45:49 -0800, you wrote: > > >> > > >>>The AYANAMSA specified in the BLC2. appears to be incorrect. As > per > > >the NEW KPA tables, uploaded to-day, the AYAN on 15th April 1950 is > > >23-04-22. On 20th Dec 1950, i.e. appr 8 monthss later, the Ayan > will be > > >23 37 27(app). The specified ayanmasa 0f 22 22 30 is less by 15 > > >minutes. This will affect Moon's position and also the Dasa on > date of > > >Event. > > >>> > > >>>This restriction should not be put, and the members be advised to > > >follow the new kpa aynamsa. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>rongaunt <rongaunt@b...> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>Chart details are: > > >>> > > >>>Male, > > >>>D.O.B. 20th Dec 1950 > > >>>Time 5:02am > > >>>I.S.T -5:30 > > >>>10N46, 076E42 > > >>> > > >>>Asc 12 Scorpio 20 (ayanamsa 22:22:30) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>What happened on the 2 November 1979? Choose from one > > >>>of the following: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>1. Got married. > > >>>2. Emigrated to the USA > > >>>3. Son Born. > > >>>4 Promotion in job. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>It would be preferable if respondents could give reasons up front > > >>>to help others in their understanding. However, if time is at > > >>>a premium just the answer is acceptable initially. But please > > >>>be prepared to elaborate later if you answer correctly. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Please reply by 00:00am GMT Tuesday 23 Nov 04. After which the > > >>>answer will be provided. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Ron Gaunt > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.