Guest guest Posted November 15, 2004 Report Share Posted November 15, 2004 >Jupiter is in its own star and sub is Sun. Jupiter is significator for 1,3 and 10 which might suggest problems in career but does not suggest accident or death. Rahu substitutes for Mars significator of 2,4,5,11,12 or Jupiter (by aspect) as above. Again no suggestion of accident or death. So the dasas to my mind do not support the idea of death. There is a strong feeling of accident from Mercury and Venus but Jupiter just does not seem to fit the event. However, looking at dasa dates I note that Saturn replaces Jupiter only 3days later on the 13th October 31. Resetting the dasa for 1900 to 22:22:00 I note that the dasas for the event now become Me/Ve/Sa/Sa. This appears far more appropriate.< Ron , All good points. I had a look at the ruling planets for this chart . The Moon came out as a strong RP(Me was not a RP) so I would consider moving the ascendent to JU Ve Ve Mo ie in the range 13:48:53 Sg to 14:00:00Sg This should then get the correct dasa for the accident event. Ron Day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2004 Report Share Posted November 16, 2004 Ron, Please see reply ** .....................** Ron Gaunt On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:48:23 +1000, you wrote: > > >Jupiter is in its own star and sub is Sun. Jupiter is significator for >1,3 and 10 which might suggest problems in career but does not suggest >accident or death. >Rahu substitutes for Mars significator of 2,4,5,11,12 or Jupiter (by >aspect) as above. Again no suggestion of accident or death. >So the dasas to my mind do not support the idea of death. There is a strong >feeling of accident from Mercury and Venus but Jupiter just does not seem >to fit the event. However, looking at dasa dates I note that Saturn >replaces Jupiter only 3days later on the 13th October 31. Resetting the >dasa for 1900 to 22:22:00 I note that the dasas for the event now become >Me/Ve/Sa/Sa. This appears far more appropriate.< > > >Ron , > >All good points. > I had a look at the ruling planets for this chart . The Moon came out >as a strong RP(Me was not a RP) so I would consider moving the ascendent >to JU Ve Ve Mo ie in the range 13:48:53 Sg to 14:00:00Sg > >This should then get the correct dasa for the accident event. ** You mention that Moon came out strong but Me was not a RP. However, note that Moon is situated in Saturn Star and Mercury Sub. These are the critical planets in the chart and constitute the 'death axis'. Whilst your suggestion is a possibility; to my mind Saturn is more likely as part of the dasa, due to its prominence in the natal chart and its involvement in the S.E, and its exact aspect to the death axis on the day of the accident. Also effecting such a change would need an adjustment of up to 2 minutes in the time of birth. I wonder if this is likely when the birth time is precisely quoted as 11:48am. Also note transiting Asc at the time of the accident is in exact aspect to natal Asc which suggests that the calculated Asc is correct. One point that I didn't mention was that it is possible to keep the 'accepted' ayanamsa of 22:22:30 and still come up with acceptable dasas. This is using Parallax Moon. We then get Me/Ve/Sa/Me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2004 Report Share Posted November 16, 2004 > > One point that I didn't mention was that it is possible to > keep the 'accepted' ayanamsa of 22:22:30 and still come up > with acceptable dasas. This is using Parallax Moon. > We then get Me/Ve/Sa/Me.< Ron, Sorry I was not clear here. I did a prashna for the chart in question and found ruling planets from this. So consider a change in birth time. In any case, from my version of PL using the 11.48 am time, I get a dasa of ME Ve Sa Sa for the event date of 10 Oct 1931 using krishnamurti ayanamsha. Ron Day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2004 Report Share Posted November 16, 2004 Ron Please see comments ** .............. ** Ron Gaunt On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:21:11 +1000, you wrote: > > >> > One point that I didn't mention was that it is possible to >> keep the 'accepted' ayanamsa of 22:22:30 and still come up >> with acceptable dasas. This is using Parallax Moon. >> We then get Me/Ve/Sa/Me.< > >Ron, > >Sorry I was not clear here. I did a prashna for the chart in question and >found ruling planets from this. >So consider a change in birth time. >In any case, from my version of PL using the 11.48 am time, I get a dasa of >ME Ve Sa Sa for the event date of 10 Oct 1931 using krishnamurti ayanamsha. ** Yes, with PL I also get Me/Ve/Sa/Sa. However, I am referring to Parallax Moon above; and PL (as far as I am aware) does not have an option for Parallax. You will have to use either Goravani Jyotish or Solar Fire for Parallax. As S.F. only shows Dasa and Buhkti you will have to check the 'ayanamsa of date' (after setting the Parallax option), and program PL with the same to come up with Parallax to show the dasas. ** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.