Blind Chart participation

[Guest guest]

I will be posting the answer to KPBC1 next Monday, and I urge

members to attempt the exercise.

 

I have previously talked to other astrologers on how they see

Blind Charts. Invariably they are enthusiastic saying they

learn from others. However, many of them never participate

themselves. When asked why, they mention lack of experience,

or lack of time as the main things standing in their way. I

suspect that there is another reason in that few astrologers

readily admit that they are not yet perfect in this most

difficult of all arts and science.

 

I suspect many astrologers are stuck in familiar territory, and

an astrological consultant may have little time to improve his

skills. However, there is one overriding reason why the Blind

Chart is so useful. Unlike contemporary readings where the

outcome of predictions are frequently unknown, the Blind Chart

offers a result within a week or so. Attempting such charts,

hones the skill of the practitioner and introduces him to new

ideas, and helps him question practices that he may have done

incorrectly for years.

 

Simply quickly reading the results of others attempts, is no

substitute for attempting the B.C. oneself, as it is the impact

of ones own efforts that produces the results and skills.

Also, with minimal participation, existing participants soon

wonder whether it is worth the effort and may cease contributing.

Hence onlookers get deprived of readings that they may enjoy and

benefit from.

 

K.P. is a unique system and with the quality of astrologers on

this List I think we could get results not obtained elsewhere.

 

 

 

Ron Gaunt

[Guest guest]

Dear Ron Gaunt,

 

>I suspect that there is another reason in that few astrologers

> readily admit that they are not yet perfect in this most

> difficult of all arts and science.

 

No body is perfect.

 

If there are really such a few astrologers who openly 'admit that

they are not yet perfect in this most difficult of all arts and

science', I admire them as very honest astrologers.

 

 

Best regards,

 

tw

 

 

, rongaunt <rongaunt@b...> wrote:

>

> I will be posting the answer to KPBC1 next Monday, and I urge

> members to attempt the exercise.

>

> I have previously talked to other astrologers on how they see

> Blind Charts. Invariably they are enthusiastic saying they

> learn from others. However, many of them never participate

> themselves. When asked why, they mention lack of experience,

> or lack of time as the main things standing in their way. I

> suspect that there is another reason in that few astrologers

> readily admit that they are not yet perfect in this most

> difficult of all arts and science.

>

> I suspect many astrologers are stuck in familiar territory, and

> an astrological consultant may have little time to improve his

> skills. However, there is one overriding reason why the Blind

> Chart is so useful. Unlike contemporary readings where the

> outcome of predictions are frequently unknown, the Blind Chart

> offers a result within a week or so. Attempting such charts,

> hones the skill of the practitioner and introduces him to new

> ideas, and helps him question practices that he may have done

> incorrectly for years.

>

> Simply quickly reading the results of others attempts, is no

> substitute for attempting the B.C. oneself, as it is the impact

> of ones own efforts that produces the results and skills.

> Also, with minimal participation, existing participants soon

> wonder whether it is worth the effort and may cease contributing.

> Hence onlookers get deprived of readings that they may enjoy and

> benefit from.

>

> K.P. is a unique system and with the quality of astrologers on

> this List I think we could get results not obtained elsewhere.

>

>

>

> Ron Gaunt