Guest guest Posted August 24, 2004 Report Share Posted August 24, 2004 Dear Ajay S Pandav Thank you for your interesting article on the Four Step Theory. I am wondering if you could kindly clarify points raised in your article? "There are two types of signficators of planet. One is ordinary and second one is strong and powerful. The planets, which are not in constellation-lord, are the strong and powerful significator planets and gives definite, strong strength and effectiveness in predictions of a particular event correctly. The planet in its own constellation lord is also treated as strong significator. The secondary or ordinary significators are the planets, which are in constellation lord are not that much powerful to give effective results. When the planets are in conjunction or aspect of other planets maximum to the extent of 4 degrees will be effective significator & can be considered planet in happening of event. " What is meant by "The planets, which are not in constellation-lord,"? Does "in its own constellation lord" mean planets in their own star? Thanks for your kind attention. Sincerely Maurice Seguin Toronto, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.