Guest guest Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Hello Punitji, Thankyou for your reply. The current dasa running and the details are as follows - Maha Dasa:Ketu Minor:Ketu Subminor:Mercury from Dec 12,03 till Jan.2, 04 Birth details: 1963 March 6, 1:29am IST at 80dg 37' E & 7 dg 28 N In this chart ketu is 4 deg. away from Venus so they are conjoined. Ketu will give result of Venus. (note chandra is 29 of mithuna this is an opposition to Ketu but I believe conjucntion is stronger than opposition 180 dg aspect) I am still learning this system and am at a juncture to find out how to apply the rule I addressed in the first email (see below) > Do we take rahu's direct sublord ( from the above table) > or do we look at chandra as giving the result of Rahu in this case > (since chandra is conjoined with rahu )? When dealing with Rahu and Ketu when do we use its own star lord and sub lord and WHEN do we use the star lord and sub lord of the planet conjoined/aspected/consetellation star/sign lord ? regards, Kesara. - Saturday, December 20, 2003 4:12 AM Digest Number 152 > There is 1 message in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. Re: Independent business KP rule > Punit Pandey <pandeypunit > > > ______________________ > ______________________ > > Message: 1 > Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:53:37 -0800 (PST) > Punit Pandey <pandeypunit > Re: Independent business KP rule > > Dear Mr. Kesara, > The information provided by you clearly shows that the person will be in > business that might be speculative in nature. So as per my opinion there > is no need to identify whether business or service suits him. > > I am reaching to this conclusion due to heavy influance of Moon and Mercury > (both are faster moving planets) on 7th house. > > If possible, post the current dasa running. Only matching with dasa one can exactly > predict the results. > > I don't have 3rd reader with me but I think Sri KSK's statement must not be > taken as it is. I personally conclude that the impact of slow moving planets > on 7th house will give service and fast moving planet will give business. As > noramlly in service the income is more or less consistant which is not the > case with business. It is a general defination only and not a hard and fast > rule which may vary with the native. > > Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > " K.Pandittesekera " <kpandit91 wrote: > Namaste dear members: > > I am working on a chart trying to findout whether > independent business is suitable for a person. > > According to KP rule in book (reader 3, pg362) he says judge if 7th > lord or significator of 7th has SUB of saturn. > > The chart I am working on is a Dhanus lagna. > 7th cusp is sign - mercury, star - rahu, sub - rahu > Rahu is in the 7th bhava conjunct with chandra. > Doing a table looking at significators of 7th we get > Chandra, Rahu, mercury as significators of the house. > > sign lord star lord sub lord > Chandra - mercury jupiter moon > Rahu - moon (in cancer) saturn saturn > mercury - saturn (in kumba) mars mercury > > As regards this rule above it is clear that chandra and mercury > have no sub of saturn. But Rahu does have sub of saturn. > Do we take rahu's direct sublord ( from the above table) > or do we look at chandra as giving the result of Rahu in this case > (since chandra is conjoined with rahu )? The orb of conjunction > between Rahu and chandra is tight being only 5 degrees apart. > chandra 29 dg of mithuna and rahu in 4 dg of kataka. > > What is the correct conclusion accordking to KP on this issue?. > > Your help in the matter is v. much appreciated. > > Kesara P. > > > > > > New Photos - easier uploading and sharing > > [This message contained attachments] > > > > ______________________ > ______________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2003 Report Share Posted December 24, 2003 Dear Mr K.Pandittesekera, I will have the following approach to find the possibility: a. Judge the 10 cusp sub-lord and the sub of the sub lord. If it shows business then it is ok otherwise the job is predicted.( if 6 th cusp is in sig ). b. If the business is predicted then the 7 cusp sub-lord must be checked. c. if the 7 cusp sub lord and it's sub-lord show the sig of 6 and 12 house then it shows the breake in partnership. If 8 house is also involved then the breake will be quarrel some. So independent business is good. d. If the 7 sub lord and it's sub-lord do not show 6-12 house sig then the partnership business is predicted. e. Do not forget to synchonise this with dasas running . This is just my approach to the probelm. To judge more clearly also judge the positions of star lord and cusp lords of 10 and 7 house . with regards, Anurodh."K.Pandittesekera" <kpandit91 wrote: Namaste dear members:I am working on a chart trying to findout whetherindependent business is suitable for a person.According to KP rule in book (reader 3, pg362) he says judge if 7thlord or significator of 7th has SUB of saturn.The chart I am working on is a Dhanus lagna.7th cusp is sign - mercury, star - rahu, sub - rahuRahu is in the 7th bhava conjunct with chandra.Doing a table looking at significators of 7th we getChandra, Rahu, mercury as significators of the house.sign lord star lord sub lordChandra - mercury jupiter moonRahu - moon (in cancer) saturn saturnmercury - saturn (in kumba) mars mercuryAs regards this rule above it is clear that chandra and mercuryhave no sub of saturn. But Rahu does have sub of saturn.Do we take rahu's direct sublord ( from the above table)or do we look at chandra as giving the result of Rahu in this case(since chandra is conjoined with rahu )? The orb of conjunctionbetween Rahu and chandra is tight being only 5 degrees apart.chandra 29 dg of mithuna and rahu in 4 dg of kataka.What is the correct conclusion accordking to KP on this issue?.Your help in the matter is v. much appreciated.Kesara P. Photos - Get your photo on the big screen in Times Square Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2003 Report Share Posted December 24, 2003 Dear Mr.Kesara.Here I am making an attempt for the brief analysis; a.The 10 sub lord is moon. moon in the star of jup and moon is in it's own sub --- so moon sig 3-1-4-7-8.Jup is aspecting with trine aspect from the 3 house to the moon. 10 cusp star lord is also moon.The cusp lord is mercury which in the star of mars which sig 5-8-12. Merc is in the aspect of mars. Merc is with venus the sig of 6 house. THIS SHOWS THAT THIS NATIVE MUST BE IN THE JOB AND WILL ALWAYS HAVE GREAT TEMPTATION FOR THE BUSINESS. THE SUB LORD OF 1O CUSP IS MOON AND IT WILL CERTAINLY TAKE HIM TO THE BUSINESS. BUT THE SIG OF MOON DOES NOT PROMISE THE BUSINESS OPTION IS FRUITFULL TO HIM AS YOU CAN SEE THAT SUB OF MOON IS MOON ITSELF AND IT IS SHOWING THE HOUSES 4-7-8. THESE HOUSES ARE NEVER GOOD FROM FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW. AS VIRGO IS RISING IN THE 10 HOUSE WHICH A AIRY SIGN AND MERC THE LORD IS ALSO AFFLICTED BY MARS WITH THE SIG OF 5-7-8 SHOW THE RISE IS DIFFICULT IN LIFE FOR HIM. MERC IS ALSO WEAK BY DEGREES SHOW THAT THE STABILITY IS QUESTIONABLE.THE LORD OF 10 MERC IS ALSO AFFLICTED BY KETU IN THE SECOND TO QUEST FOR STATUS IS A STRUGGLING POINT THE THE LIFE. THE PRESENT DASA IF OF KETU WHICH IS SHOWING THE 6TH HOUSE SIG BEING CONJOINED WITH VENUS . KETU IS IN CLOSE CONJUNCTION WITH MERC THE 10 LORD AND IS ASPECTED BY MARS SHOWING 5-8-12 AND KETU IS THE SIG OF 9TH HOUSE SO--- THIS PERSON IS TEMPTED TO TAKE THE WRONG DECISION TO LEAVE THE PRESENT PROFESSION AND DO SOME BUSINESS. AS THE PRESENT DASA AND NEXT DASA OF VENUS ( MAHADASA ) SHOW THE JOB ONLY SO IT IS ADVISABLE FOR HIM THAT HE MUST NOT THINK FOR THE BUSINESS AT ALL OTHERWISE HE IS GOING IN FOR A HEAVY LOSS IN KETU/MERC. PARTNERSHIP RISES NO QUESTION AS RAHU THE SUB-LORD IS SHOWING DISPUTES ON THAT PART BUT AS BEING ASPECTED BY JUP SO IT SHOWS ALL PEACEFUL THINGS. SO ADVISE: NO BUSINESS VENTURE IS THE RIGHT OPTION. ESTEEMED MEMBERS CAN SEE TO IT AND POST THEIR COMMENTS. IT IS ALWAYS ADVISABLE TO SEE " IS BUSINESS SUITABLE FOR THE PERSON OR NOT ' IT IS MY APPROACH.REGARDS, ANURODH."K.Pandittesekera" <kpandit91 wrote: Hello Punitji,Thankyou for your reply.The current dasa running and the details are as follows -Maha Dasa:Ketu Minor:Ketu Subminor:Mercuryfrom Dec 12,03 till Jan.2, 04Birth details:1963 March 6, 1:29am IST at 80dg 37' E & 7 dg 28 NIn this chart ketu is 4 deg. away from Venus so theyare conjoined. Ketu will give result of Venus. (note chandrais 29 of mithuna this is an opposition to Ketu but I believe conjucntionis stronger than opposition 180 dg aspect)I am still learning this system and am at a juncture tofind out how to apply the rule I addressed in the first email(see below)> Do we take rahu's direct sublord ( from the above table)> or do we look at chandra as giving the result of Rahu in this case> (since chandra is conjoined with rahu )?When dealing with Rahu and Ketu when do we use its ownstar lord and sub lord and WHEN do we use the star lord and sub lordof the planet conjoined/aspected/consetellation star/sign lord ?regards,Kesara.- Saturday, December 20, 2003 4:12 AM Digest Number 152> There is 1 message in this issue.>> Topics in this digest:>> 1. Re: Independent business KP rule> Punit Pandey >>> ______________________> ______________________>> Message: 1> Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:53:37 -0800 (PST)> Punit Pandey > Re: Independent business KP rule>> Dear Mr. Kesara,> The information provided by you clearly shows that the person will be in> business that might be speculative in nature. So as per my opinion there> is no need to identify whether business or service suits him.>> I am reaching to this conclusion due to heavy influance of Moon andMercury> (both are faster moving planets) on 7th house.>> If possible, post the current dasa running. Only matching with dasa onecan exactly> predict the results.>> I don't have 3rd reader with me but I think Sri KSK's statement must notbe> taken as it is. I personally conclude that the impact of slow movingplanets> on 7th house will give service and fast moving planet will give business.As> noramlly in service the income is more or less consistant which is not the> case with business. It is a general defination only and not a hard andfast> rule which may vary with the native.>> Regards,>> Punit Pandey>> "K.Pandittesekera" wrote:> Namaste dear members:>> I am working on a chart trying to findout whether> independent business is suitable for a person.>> According to KP rule in book (reader 3, pg362) he says judge if 7th> lord or significator of 7th has SUB of saturn.>> The chart I am working on is a Dhanus lagna.> 7th cusp is sign - mercury, star - rahu, sub - rahu> Rahu is in the 7th bhava conjunct with chandra.> Doing a table looking at significators of 7th we get> Chandra, Rahu, mercury as significators of the house.>> sign lord star lord sub lord> Chandra - mercury jupiter moon> Rahu - moon (in cancer) saturn saturn> mercury - saturn (in kumba) mars mercury>> As regards this rule above it is clear that chandra and mercury> have no sub of saturn. But Rahu does have sub of saturn.> Do we take rahu's direct sublord ( from the above table)> or do we look at chandra as giving the result of Rahu in this case> (since chandra is conjoined with rahu )? The orb of conjunction> between Rahu and chandra is tight being only 5 degrees apart.> chandra 29 dg of mithuna and rahu in 4 dg of kataka.>> What is the correct conclusion accordking to KP on this issue?.>> Your help in the matter is v. much appreciated.>> Kesara P.>>>> > > New Photos - easier uploading and sharing>> [This message contained attachments]>>>> ______________________> ______________________>>> To from this group, send an email to:> - >>>> ------> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.