Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Bliss wrote: > Are there any exmaples where sidereal moon in cancer folks were pretty > focused and organized? Would be great to know. Sari: I took a look at AstroDatabank with people with the Moon on Cancer ascendant, no other planets there, so that the " Cancerness " would come purely through. 1. Ruth Chatterton, 24th December 1893 at 7.30 PM +5.00 New York, NY - A quote from ADB: " American actress, a writer and a pilot. She took her first stage job as a dare at 14 in a New York chorus line. Her Broadway debut, four years later, was in a turkey that ran for 21 days. By age 21, she was a star in a Henry Miller production. (...) She was a dulcet-voiced movie queen plus a tough-minded feminist and pilot of her own plane. In 1950 she became noted as a serious novelist when her first book, 'Homeward Borne' became a best-seller. She wrote three more novels, the last in 1958. " Comment: this pilot thing impresses me. Chatterton was acquainted with Amelia Earhart, who was the first woman to obtain an aviator's licence. Earhart had an exalted Moon; her Sun, Mercury and Ketu in Cancer; and her Moon, ascendant and Saturn in Cancer navamsa. Mythologically these pilot women remind me of the Greek goddess Artemis: " The daughter of Leto and Zeus, and the twin of Apollo. Artemis is the goddess of the wilderness, the hunt and wild animals, and fertility (she became a goddess of fertility and childbirth mainly in cities). She was often depicted with the crescent of the moon above her forehead and was sometimes identified with Selene (goddess of the moon). " http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/artemis.html 2. Julio Gallo, 21st March 1910 at 2.00 PM +8.00 Oakland, CA - A quote from ADB: " American vintner, a multimillionaire entrepreneur. Julio was in charge of the winemaking operation of a huge family winery that distributed low price wines in supermarkets. His partnership with his brother Ernst netted him a personal income around $1.5 billion. (...) Julio went into partnership with his older brother Ernest, establishing the Gallo Brothers Wineries after the repeal of Prohibition. In the partnership, Julio was in charge of the winemaking operation. He exposed the family to a strong work ethic. Julio was concerned with preserving some of the Gallo land as a wildlife refuge. Julio and Ernest were wealthy contributors to both the Republican and Democratic Parties. They reached the distinction of being two of the wealthiest Americans of their era with a fortune estimated at $1.3 billion. " 3. James Reston, 3rd November 1909 at 10.40 Pm 0.00 Clydebank, Scotland - a Quote from ADB: " Scottish-American author, journalist, columnist, correspondent and Executive Director of The New York Times. In a career spanning five decades, he was the Washington Bureau Chief of the New Times from 1953-1964 and a two time Pulitzer Prize winner. Reston helped to create the nation's first Op-Ed page in 1970, reserving a page across from newspaper editorials as a page for columnist's opinion pieces. (...) His 'Washington' column, which ran in the Times for 25 years, was a must-read for politicians and fellow journalists. He was once said to be 'the greatest journalist of his generation,' who 'recruited two generations of journalists at the Times and elsewhere.' Following his outstanding success as Washington Bureau Chief, he became the Times' Executive Editor. " Comment: this reminds me of how the ancient Egyptians connected the scribe god Thoth to the Moon. 4. Gregor Strasser, 31st May 1892 at 9.00 AM -1.00 Geisenfeld, Germany - A quote from ADB: " German politician who competed with Hitler for head of the National Socialist party, an opponent for eight years of political contest. Serving in the military during WW II, Strasser became a Lieutenant and was awarded the Iron Cross. Postwar, he became an apothecary up to 1932 when he sold his shop and entered politics. An able organizer and shrewd operative, he loved action but was not a strong speaker. " ---------------- Thanks for this task, this cleared the point even more at least to myself. This path seems really worth exploring. Regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Thanks Sari, terrific info! I am a beginner in astro realms, at least sidereally, but seems like sidereal cancers are not wishy washy sentimental people who can be taken for a ride? as seems the tropical take on it? or is that perception incorrect. (BTW both tom cruise and katy holmes have sidereal cancer moons.) What happens when that sidereal cancer happens to be a late moon say 27 degress and more. Does it lose its 'mooniness'? Does it become more leo like? Curious if the theory of progression to the next sign hold true even sidereally/vedically.. BTW tomorrow there's a partial lunar eclipse around 11 am in US or so. What might be its impact on various astrological categories of people Thanks Shiva ( I have had this urge for quite sometime to change my nic to Shiva..better now than never:)) , " Sari Metsovuori " <gerdapp wrote: > > Bliss wrote: > > > Are there any exmaples where sidereal moon in cancer folks were pretty > > focused and organized? Would be great to know. > > Sari: > > I took a look at AstroDatabank with people with the Moon on Cancer > ascendant, no other planets there, so that the " Cancerness " would come > purely through. > > > 1. Ruth Chatterton, 24th December 1893 at 7.30 PM +5.00 New York, NY > > - A quote from ADB: > > " American actress, a writer and a pilot. She took her first stage job as a > dare at 14 in a New York chorus line. Her Broadway debut, four years later, > was in a turkey that ran for 21 days. By age 21, she was a star in a Henry > Miller production. (...) She was a dulcet-voiced movie queen plus a > tough-minded feminist and pilot of her own plane. In 1950 she became noted > as a serious novelist when her first book, 'Homeward Borne' became a > best-seller. She wrote three more novels, the last in 1958. " > > Comment: this pilot thing impresses me. Chatterton was acquainted with > Amelia Earhart, who was the first woman to obtain an aviator's licence. > Earhart had an exalted Moon; her Sun, Mercury and Ketu in Cancer; and her > Moon, ascendant and Saturn in Cancer navamsa. > > Mythologically these pilot women remind me of the Greek goddess Artemis: > > " The daughter of Leto and Zeus, and the twin of Apollo. Artemis is the > goddess of the wilderness, the hunt and wild animals, and fertility (she > became a goddess of fertility and childbirth mainly in cities). She was > often depicted with the crescent of the moon above her forehead and was > sometimes identified with Selene (goddess of the moon). " > http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/artemis.html > > > 2. Julio Gallo, 21st March 1910 at 2.00 PM +8.00 Oakland, CA > > - A quote from ADB: > > " American vintner, a multimillionaire entrepreneur. Julio was in charge of > the winemaking operation of a huge family winery that distributed low price > wines in supermarkets. His partnership with his brother Ernst netted him a > personal income around $1.5 billion. (...) > > Julio went into partnership with his older brother Ernest, establishing the > Gallo Brothers Wineries after the repeal of Prohibition. In the > partnership, Julio was in charge of the winemaking operation. He exposed the > family to a strong work ethic. Julio was concerned with preserving some of > the Gallo land as a wildlife refuge. Julio and Ernest were wealthy > contributors to both the Republican and Democratic Parties. They reached > the distinction of being two of the wealthiest Americans of their era with a > fortune estimated at $1.3 billion. " > > > 3. James Reston, 3rd November 1909 at 10.40 Pm 0.00 Clydebank, Scotland > > - a Quote from ADB: > > " Scottish-American author, journalist, columnist, correspondent and > Executive Director of The New York Times. In a career spanning five > decades, he was the Washington Bureau Chief of the New Times from 1953-1964 > and a two time Pulitzer Prize winner. Reston helped to create the nation's > first Op-Ed page in 1970, reserving a page across from newspaper editorials > as a page for columnist's opinion pieces. (...) > > His 'Washington' column, which ran in the Times for 25 years, was a > must-read for politicians and fellow journalists. He was once said to be > 'the greatest journalist of his generation,' who 'recruited two generations > of journalists at the Times and elsewhere.' Following his outstanding > success as Washington Bureau Chief, he became the Times' Executive Editor. " > > Comment: this reminds me of how the ancient Egyptians connected the scribe > god Thoth to the Moon. > > > 4. Gregor Strasser, 31st May 1892 at 9.00 AM -1.00 Geisenfeld, Germany > > - A quote from ADB: > > " German politician who competed with Hitler for head of the National > Socialist party, an opponent for eight years of political contest. > Serving in the military during WW II, Strasser became a Lieutenant and was > awarded the Iron Cross. Postwar, he became an apothecary up to 1932 when he > sold his shop and entered politics. An able organizer and shrewd operative, > he loved action but was not a strong speaker. " > > ---------------- > > Thanks for this task, this cleared the point even more at least to myself. > This path seems really worth exploring. > > Regards, Sari > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2006 Report Share Posted September 7, 2006 At 06:38 PM 9/6/06 -0000, Bliss wrote: >Thanks Sari, >terrific info! Right, I agree! Sari has an exciting approach to astrology. As one forum member wrote to me privately: " Sari is so refreshing! And she can disagree without being disagreeable. " >I am a beginner in astro realms, at least sidereally, but seems like >sidereal cancers are not wishy washy sentimental people who can be >taken for a ride? as seems the tropical take on it? or is that >perception incorrect. Rupert Gleadow in YOUR CHARACTER IN THE ZODIAC says that in ancient times Cancer is described as a sign of the politician. Here is a quote from the book (p. 72): " Two thousand years ago there was nothing sentimental about the Moon and the sea; they suggested travel and trade, and to knock about in the owrld of those days, it was no use being thin-skinned. so it was the crab's hard shell which was emphasized then, not the half-hidden sensitiveness on which modern writers have laid stress. " There could not be a greater contrast than between the soft sentimental maternal Canerian of the tropical zodiac and Manilius's hard-boiled banker... " Then Gleadow gives a long quote from Valens and states: " Here is the complete politician! The Moon's rulership is obvious in his dependence on the public and on circumstance.... " Of course our current president as well as Al Gore has Cancer rising with planets--and many others in the political sphere as well. >(BTW both tom cruise and katy holmes have sidereal cancer moons.) >What happens when that sidereal cancer happens to be a late moon say >27 degress and more. All of sidereal Cancer stays the same except for the variable influences of the nakshatras and stars. In the tropical zodiac, however, the signs change toward the end reflecting the new unerlying sidereal sign which starts in the vacinity of 25 degrees or so tropically. >( I have had this urge for quite sometime to change my nic to >Shiva..better now than never:)) Are you sure you want to identify yourself with such a powerful destructive deity?? The Shiva energy is real. Blessings, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2006 Report Share Posted September 7, 2006 Shiva wrote: > terrific info! > I am a beginner in astro realms, at least sidereally, but seems like > sidereal cancers are not wishy washy sentimental people who can be > taken for a ride? as seems the tropical take on it? or is that > perception incorrect. Sari: I'm as excited about these findings as you! No, I would say that sidereal Cancer is not a sentimental wishy washy sign (there's been times that I've thought it is, but real life observation says repeatedly otherwise). After I've again studied the Moon and sidereal Cancer, I would say that the Moon is not so much about emotions as it is about instincts. It is about motherhood, but not about the kind of warm, loving, sentimental motherhood, but about caring the baby's basic needs, that it's not hungry, wet, cold, etc. - that it stays alive. Maybe the Moon is basically about staying alive. That needs at least elementary organizational skills and practicality. Mother Moon is always worrying - are you safe, do you have enough clothes on, do you have your stomach filled... I connect the Moon with enneagram type 6 - the fear type. Type Six is about safety, trust and authorities. Like the Moon mirrors Sun's light, the Six seeks authority that would tell it how things are. But as soon as it finds an authority nominate, it starts to question it. It worries what will happen, if it surrenders to an authority that proves to be untrustworthy. Enneagram experts write about two types of Sixes: the phobic and the counter-phobic type. The counter-phobic type is so afraid about being afraid, it's instinctive center so overalarmed, that it decides to attack before it gets attacked. I would think this explains " Super Cancer " GW Bush's policy in Iraq and other Middle East countries. He explains it so that the US is only defending itself - by attacking first on a foreign soil. On Bush Era everything has been about safety, guarding, controlling, fear... Also the famous lunar intuition stems from the same mechanism. It's a function of the instincts - perceiving and sensing things, energies and feelings around. It's not an emotional function, but has more to do with surviving. Maybe sidereal water in general is not so much about emotions than it is about instincts. Shiva wrote: > What happens when that sidereal cancer happens to be a late moon say > 27 degress and more. Does it lose its 'mooniness'? Does it become more > leo like? Curious if the theory of progression to the next sign hold > true even sidereally/vedically.. Sari: I agree with Therese here and say that this amalgamation of signs in their last degrees is a purely tropical phenomenon. On the sidereal zodiac the sign is what it is to the last minute. If there's something that wouldn't seem to fit, it then becomes a question of ayanamsas... Regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Dear professor, Some generic queries regarding SA. How do we filter the results of a natally strong planet? i.e. when does it gives its results? For e.g. lets take a fast-moving FB like Moon. Will it bless with its significations, ONLY during the course of its sub-periods (which may be just 3-4 in an average persons lifetime)? Moon as we know is very volatile & often weak in transit - in such a case the TTT are very short lived except for the natal to transit impact of such a moon on slow moving FB. So lets say, taking example of libra ascendant, if I have to look at professional growth of a person( or promotion ) & their being no other primary determinant of profession in this case, how do I go about predicting it? If I wait for the next sub-period of moon, that may be 7-8 ahead & if I look at transit the only ones I can look at is impact of slow moving FB on a strong natal moon or 10th house. Right? Now if I have a chart( Libra Asc ) in hand in which the Saturn & Jupiter are not strong, but Moon is strong, how can I go about predicting something significant related to Moon or the 10th house? Basically what I am trying to understand is that, in case the slow moving planets are weak or they are FM( as in case of Cancer Asc) how do we time the events on the basis on strong fast moving FB's like Sun or Moon? Respected list members, your thoughts based on your experience on the above mentioned are welcome. Regards, Himanshu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Hello Himanshu, Strong planets during their sub periods give good results barring the unfavorable prolonged transit influences. Strong planets, when also strong in transit, bless with general good results of their significations and the house ruled by these planets even when there sub period is not in operation. For example when the Moon is strong for a Libra born native, it will good results regarding profession even when the sub period of the Moon is not in operation. Best wishes. - rainysky_33 Saturday, December 27, 2008 2:48 AM Moon Dear professor, Some generic queries regarding SA. How do we filter the results of a natally strong planet? i.e. when does it gives its results? For e.g. lets take a fast-moving FB like Moon. Will it bless with its significations, ONLY during the course of its sub-periods (which may be just 3-4 in an average persons lifetime)? Moon as we know is very volatile & often weak in transit - in such a case the TTT are very short lived except for the natal to transit impact of such a moon on slow moving FB. So lets say, taking example of libra ascendant, if I have to look at professional growth of a person( or promotion ) & their being no other primary determinant of profession in this case, how do I go about predicting it? If I wait for the next sub-period of moon, that may be 7-8 ahead & if I look at transit the only ones I can look at is impact of slow moving FB on a strong natal moon or 10th house. Right? Now if I have a chart( Libra Asc ) in hand in which the Saturn & Jupiter are not strong, but Moon is strong, how can I go about predicting something significant related to Moon or the 10th house? Basically what I am trying to understand is that, in case the slow moving planets are weak or they are FM( as in case of Cancer Asc) how do we time the events on the basis on strong fast moving FB's like Sun or Moon? Respected list members, your thoughts based on your experience on the above mentioned are welcome. Regards, Himanshu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Dear Professor, Thanks for improving my understanding of SA. Just to gain some more clarity, given that there is no other primary significator of profession, how do we time the results of such a strong moon for Libra when sub period of Moon is not running, for example if I have to look for a promotion, salary hike or a favourable job change, how do we time such a event? Because the strength of Moon keeps on changing so fast & so does its transit conjuctions & aspects. Regards, Himanshu , " SIHA " <vkchoudhry wrote: > > > Hello Himanshu, > > Strong planets during their sub periods give good results barring the unfavorable prolonged transit influences. > > Strong planets, when also strong in transit, bless with general good results of their significations and the house ruled by these planets even when there sub period is not in operation. For example when the Moon is strong for a Libra born native, it will good results regarding profession even when the sub period of the Moon is not in operation. > > Best wishes. > > > > > > - > rainysky_33 > > Saturday, December 27, 2008 2:48 AM > Moon > > > Dear professor, > > Some generic queries regarding SA. > > How do we filter the results of a natally strong planet? i.e. when > does it gives its results? > > For e.g. lets take a fast-moving FB like Moon. > > Will it bless with its significations, ONLY during the course of its > sub-periods (which may be just 3-4 in an average persons lifetime)? > Moon as we know is very volatile & often weak in transit - in such a > case the TTT are very short lived except for the natal to transit > impact of such a moon on slow moving FB. > > So lets say, taking example of libra ascendant, if I have to look at > professional growth of a person( or promotion ) & their being no other > primary determinant of profession in this case, how do I go about > predicting it? If I wait for the next sub-period of moon, that may be > 7-8 ahead & if I look at transit the only ones I can look at is impact > of slow moving FB on a strong natal moon or 10th house. Right? > > Now if I have a chart( Libra Asc ) in hand in which the Saturn & > Jupiter are not strong, but Moon is strong, how can I go about > predicting something significant related to Moon or the 10th house? > > Basically what I am trying to understand is that, in case the slow > moving planets are weak or they are FM( as in case of Cancer Asc) how > do we time the events on the basis on strong fast moving FB's like Sun > or Moon? > > Respected list members, your thoughts based on your experience on the > above mentioned are welcome. > > Regards, > Himanshu > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.