Guest guest Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Dear Professor, (1) Question: When we look in the tripple Transit Triggering effect, how should we consider which effect has more contribution: -Transit-Transit= ??% -Transit-Natal= ??% -Natal-Transit= ??% I don't think they are equally contributing, probablly, Transit-Natal will make more contribution, I guess. (2) Question: I understand that Transit will supercede the dasa but how we can judge for the horoscope of - Let's say sub-period is the duration of very strong Planet. (planet itself, its MEP of mulatrikona house, its dispositor, and benefit scores from FB planets). But, the slow moving transit FM planets are afflicting the MEP of its houses and some planets during this dasa. How can we conclude that? Because when we usually look at the Dasa, our judgement might be wrong, Am I right, sir? Thank you very much, professor. Khin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Hello dear Mr. Khin, I add my replies to your questions in your message appended below. Best wishes. - Khin (Numan) Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:02 AM Proportion of Transits' Effect Dear Professor, (1) Question: When we look in the tripple Transit Triggering effect, how should we consider which effect has more contribution: -Transit-Transit= ??% -Transit-Natal= ??% -Natal-Transit= ??% I don't think they are equally contributing, probablly, Transit-Natal will make more contribution, I guess. IMPACT OF ALL SITUATIONS IS EQUAL. IT IS DEPENDENT UPON NATURE OF FMP OR MMP, CLOSENESS AND TIME SPAN. (2) Question: I understand that Transit will supercede the dasa but how we can judge for the horoscope of - Let's say sub-period is the duration of very strong Planet. (planet itself, its MEP of mulatrikona house, its dispositor, and benefit scores from FB planets). But, the slow moving transit FM planets are afflicting the MEP of its houses and some planets during this dasa. How can we conclude that? Because when we usually look at the Dasa, our judgement might be wrong, Am I right, sir? NATAL STRENGTH STOPS PREVAILING IF TRANSIT AFFLICTION IS ON MEP OF THE HOUSE. Thank you very much, professor. Khin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Dear Professor, Thank you very much for your kind wisdom and time, sir. Khin. --- On Wed, 7/30/08, SIHA <vkchoudhry wrote: SIHA <vkchoudhry Re: Proportion of Transits' Effect Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 3:45 PM Hello dear Mr. Khin, I add my replies to your questions in your message appended below. Best wishes. - Khin (Numan) @ s.com Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:02 AM Proportion of Transits' Effect Dear Professor, (1) Question: When we look in the tripple Transit Triggering effect, how should we consider which effect has more contribution: -Transit-Transit= ??% -Transit-Natal= ??% -Natal-Transit= ??% I don't think they are equally contributing, probablly, Transit-Natal will make more contribution, I guess. IMPACT OF ALL SITUATIONS IS EQUAL. IT IS DEPENDENT UPON NATURE OF FMP OR MMP, CLOSENESS AND TIME SPAN. (2) Question: I understand that Transit will supercede the dasa but how we can judge for the horoscope of - Let's say sub-period is the duration of very strong Planet. (planet itself, its MEP of mulatrikona house, its dispositor, and benefit scores from FB planets). But, the slow moving transit FM planets are afflicting the MEP of its houses and some planets during this dasa. How can we conclude that? Because when we usually look at the Dasa, our judgement might be wrong, Am I right, sir? NATAL STRENGTH STOPS PREVAILING IF TRANSIT AFFLICTION IS ON MEP OF THE HOUSE. Thank you very much, professor. Khin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Hello Prof, Does this mean, however strong a planet maybe in Natal, like FB placed in good house MEP (means not 6,8,12), not infant or old age, no affliction in natal to planet or its MT Sign no affliction in transit to its MT sign. Even during the bhukthi of this planet when it is strong in transit as well, just if there is a stationary influence of FMP on the natal position of planet in MEP of good house, then that takes precedence? Regards, Venu On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 SIHA wrote : >Hello dear Mr. Khin, > >I add my replies to your questions in your message appended below. > >Best wishes. > > > > - > Khin (Numan) > > Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:02 AM > Proportion of Transits' Effect > > > Dear Professor, > (1) Question: When we look in the tripple Transit Triggering effect, how should we consider which effect has more contribution: > -Transit-Transit= ??% > -Transit-Natal= ??% > -Natal-Transit= ??% > I don't think they are equally contributing, probablly, Transit-Natal will make more contribution, I guess. > > IMPACT OF ALL SITUATIONS IS EQUAL. IT IS DEPENDENT UPON NATURE OF FMP OR MMP, CLOSENESS AND TIME SPAN. > (2) Question: I understand that Transit will supercede the dasa but how we can judge for the horoscope of - > Let's say sub-period is the duration of very strong Planet. (planet itself, its MEP of mulatrikona house, its dispositor, and benefit scores from FB planets). But, the slow moving transit FM planets are afflicting the MEP of its houses and some planets during this dasa. > > How can we conclude that? Because when we usually look at the Dasa, our judgement might be wrong, Am I right, sir? > > NATAL STRENGTH STOPS PREVAILING IF TRANSIT AFFLICTION IS ON MEP OF THE HOUSE. > > Thank you very much, professor. > Khin. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Yes, Mr. Venu. Best wishes. - Venugopal.V Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:51 PM Re: Re: Proportion of Transits' Effect Hello Prof, Does this mean, however strong a planet maybe in Natal, like FB placed in good house MEP (means not 6,8,12), not infant or old age, no affliction in natal to planet or its MT Sign no affliction in transit to its MT sign. Even during the bhukthi of this planet when it is strong in transit as well, just if there is a stationary influence of FMP on the natal position of planet in MEP of good house, then that takes precedence? Regards, Venu On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 SIHA wrote : >Hello dear Mr. Khin, > >I add my replies to your questions in your message appended below. > >Best wishes. > > > > - > Khin (Numan) > > Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:02 AM > Proportion of Transits' Effect > > > Dear Professor, > (1) Question: When we look in the tripple Transit Triggering effect, how should we consider which effect has more contribution: > -Transit-Transit= ??% > -Transit-Natal= ??% > -Natal-Transit= ??% > I don't think they are equally contributing, probablly, Transit-Natal will make more contribution, I guess. > > IMPACT OF ALL SITUATIONS IS EQUAL. IT IS DEPENDENT UPON NATURE OF FMP OR MMP, CLOSENESS AND TIME SPAN. > (2) Question: I understand that Transit will supercede the dasa but how we can judge for the horoscope of - > Let's say sub-period is the duration of very strong Planet. (planet itself, its MEP of mulatrikona house, its dispositor, and benefit scores from FB planets). But, the slow moving transit FM planets are afflicting the MEP of its houses and some planets during this dasa. > > How can we conclude that? Because when we usually look at the Dasa, our judgement might be wrong, Am I right, sir? > > NATAL STRENGTH STOPS PREVAILING IF TRANSIT AFFLICTION IS ON MEP OF THE HOUSE. > > Thank you very much, professor. > Khin. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.