Impact of planets on MEP of MT sign houses

[Guest guest]

Hello Venu,

 

Suppose Leo is the ascendant and on the MEP of the third house containing MT

sign of Venus, Jupiter is placed. During the sub period of Venus the good

impact of Jupiter would also be felt depending upon its strength.

 

Non MT sign houses have their own significations which will not suffer due

to the weakness and affliction of the concerned MT sign lord. But if the

house is afflicted the significations of the house will suffer and if the

house has good influence the significations of the house will get promoted

as per the strength of the influence.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

 

-

" Venugopal.V " <venuvenkat

 

Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:40 PM

Re: Re: Confusion

 

 

| Hello Prof,

|

| Some queries based on your reply below,

|

| The FB away from MEP producing results for its significations and FB in

MEP of non-MT producing results for itself and aspecting houses is clear.

|

| But in the case of MT Sign and FB in MEP, I'm not clear how lord of sign

also conveys the influence of the FB. Can you give an example.

|

| One other query I have is I'm trying to come with a table for reference on

how to read the non-MT significations for each ascendant like

|

| Aries - 2H - ? , 3H - ?, 8H - ?, 10H - ?, 12H - ?

| Taurus - 1H - ?, 2H - ?, 7H - ?, 9H - ?, 11H - ?

| Gemini - 1H - ?, 6H - ?, 8H - ?, 10H - ?, 12H - ?

| Cancer - 5H - ?, 7H - ?, 9H - ?, 11H - ?, 12H - ?

| Leo - 4H - ?, 6H - ?, 8H - ?, 10H - ?, 11H - ?

| Virgo - 3H - ?, 5H - ?, 7H - ?, 9H - ?, 10H - ?

| Libra - 2H - ? , 4H - ?, 6H - ?, 8H - ?, 9H - ?

|

| and similarly for the rest.

|

| If we have this, it will help a lot in analyzing charts, as we can go

house by house, see the lords, and if no lord see this table for the

particular asdt and seperately look at the general signifactors.

|

| Regards,

| Venu

|

|

|

|

| On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 siha wrote :

| >

| >Hello Ji,

| >

| >When a well placed functional benefic is away from MEP, it produces

results

| >for its own significations - both general and particular.

| >

| >When a well placed functional benefic is on MEP or close to MEP, it

produces

| >results for its own significations and for the house of its placement and

| >the houses aspected.

| >

| >When a well placed functional benefic is close to MEP and is in a MT sign

| >then besides producing results for its own significations, houses

occupied

| >and aspected the MT sign lord of the house also conveys the influence of

| >this FB planet.

| >

| >Hope it gives you better understanding.

| >

| >Best wishes,

| >

| >

| >

| >

| >

| >-

| > " ji_sahib " <ji_sahib

| >

| >Thursday, February 15, 2007 3:49 AM

| > Confusion

| >

| >

| >|

| >| Dear Professor ,

| >|

| >| Well Placed Functional Befnafic Planet will produce same results in

| >| both situations ...

| >|

| >| (1) When it is conjunct with MEP of house of Placement?

| >|

| >| (2) When It is far away from MEP of house of Placement?

| >|

| >| (3) In above example if house of placement of this Planet is a

| >| mooltrikona sign will produce different results, compare to non_

| >| mooltrikona sign?

| >|

| >| Thanks

| >|

| >|

| >|

| >|

[Guest guest]

Dear Sadasivan,

 

Thanks for the clarifications. I'm trying to analyze the

chart of a relation Ms Lakshmi. DOB :- 24th October 1985

TOB-13:40 hrs. POB-Bangalore.

 

Do send in your opinion when you find some time especially

regarding career, health/longevity and marriage/married life.

 

Regards,

Venu

 

 

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN wrote :

>Dear Venu,

>

>Non MT house does not have ownership. But it

>does not mean that it does not have

>signification . If Pisces falls as 10th house , Jup

>is not 10th lord but Pisces still remains 10th

>house. A planet in a MT sign has a dispositor

>.Planet in a Non MT sign does not have dispositor

>.

>

>If a FB is in Non MT like Sat for Gemini Lagni is

>in Pisces then 9th lord is in 10th house . 10th

>house sign will improve. FB in MEP in any house

> will benefit that house. If in MT sign then all

>planet connected with MT sign will come into

>effect during its subdasa . Eg : Jup and Venus

>as mentioned by Prof

>

>Best wishes

>

>Sadasivan

>

>

> Hello Venu,

> >

> > Try to follow what is told. Stretching the meaning

> > creates problems.

> >

> > Best wishes,

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " Venugopal.V " <venuvenkat

> >

> > Friday, February 16, 2007 12:02 PM

> > Re: Re: Re: Impact of planets on

> > MEP of MT sign houses

> >

> >

> > | Hello Prof,

> > |

> > | Thanks a lot for the response.

> > | Can we say in NON-MT case, if a FB planet is in

> > MEP and well placed,

> > | then it infact acts as the Lord of that house and

> > houses it aspects ?

> > |

> > | Regards,

> > | Venu

> > |

> > |

> > | On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 siha

> > wrote :

> > | >

> > | >Hello Venu,

> > | >

> > | >Suppose Leo is the ascendant and on the MEP of

> > the third house containing

> > MT

> > | >sign of Venus, Jupiter is placed. During the sub

> > period of Venus the

> > good

> > | >impact of Jupiter would also be felt depending

> > upon its strength.

> > | >

> > | >Non MT sign houses have their own significations

> > which will not suffer

> > due

> > | >to the weakness and affliction of the concerned

> > MT sign lord. But if the

> > | >house is afflicted the significations of the

> > house will suffer and if the

> > | >house has good influence the significations of

> > the house will get

> > promoted

> > | >as per the strength of the influence.

> > | >

> > | >Best wishes,

> > | >

> > | >

> > | >

> > | >

> > | >-

> > | > " Venugopal.V " <venuvenkat

> > | >

> > | >Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:40 PM

> > | >Re: Re: Confusion

> > | >

> > | >

> > | >| Hello Prof,

> > | >|

> > | >| Some queries based on your reply below,

> > | >|

> > | >| The FB away from MEP producing results for its

> > significations and FB in

> > | >MEP of non-MT producing results for itself and

> > aspecting houses is clear.

> > | >|

> > | >| But in the case of MT Sign and FB in MEP, I'm

> > not clear how lord of

> > sign

> > | >also conveys the influence of the FB. Can you

> > give an example.

> > | >|

> > | >| One other query I have is I'm trying to come

> > with a table for reference

> > on

> > | >how to read the non-MT significations for each

> > ascendant like

> > | >|

> > | >| Aries - 2H - ? , 3H - ?, 8H - ?, 10H - ?, 12H -

> > ?

> > | >| Taurus - 1H - ?, 2H - ?, 7H - ?, 9H - ?, 11H -

> > ?

> > | >| Gemini - 1H - ?, 6H - ?, 8H - ?, 10H - ?, 12H -

> > ?

> > | >| Cancer - 5H - ?, 7H - ?, 9H - ?, 11H - ?, 12H -

> > ?

> > | >| Leo - 4H - ?, 6H - ?, 8H - ?, 10H - ?, 11H - ?

> > | >| Virgo - 3H - ?, 5H - ?, 7H - ?, 9H - ?, 10H - ?

> > | >| Libra - 2H - ? , 4H - ?, 6H - ?, 8H - ?, 9H - ?

> > | >|

> > | >| and similarly for the rest.

> > | >|

> > | >| If we have this, it will help a lot in

> > analyzing charts, as we can go

> > | >house by house, see the lords, and if no lord see

> > this table for the

> > | >particular asdt and seperately look at the

> > general signifactors.

> > | >|

> > | >| Regards,

> > | >| Venu

> > | >|

> > | >|

> > | >|

> > | >|

> > | >| On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 siha

> > wrote :

> > | >| >

> > | >| >Hello Ji,

> > | >| >

> > | >| >When a well placed functional benefic is away

> > from MEP, it produces

> > | >results

> > | >| >for its own significations - both general and

> > particular.

> > | >| >

> > | >| >When a well placed functional benefic is on

> > MEP or close to MEP, it

> > | >produces

> > | >| >results for its own significations and for the

> > house of its placement

> > and

> > | >| >the houses aspected.

> > | >| >

> > | >| >When a well placed functional benefic is close

> > to MEP and is in a MT

> > sign

> > | >| >then besides producing results for its own

> > significations, houses

> > | >occupied

> > | >| >and aspected the MT sign lord of the house

> > also conveys the influence

> > of

> > | >| >this FB planet.

> > | >| >

> > | >| >Hope it gives you better understanding.

> > | >| >

> > | >| >Best wishes,

> > | >| >

> > | >| >

> > | >| >

> > | >| >

> > | >| >

> > | >| >-

> > | >| > " ji_sahib " <ji_sahib

> > | >| >

> > | >| >Thursday, February 15, 2007 3:49 AM

> > | >| > Confusion

> > | >| >

> > | >| >

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| Dear Professor ,

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| Well Placed Functional Befnafic Planet will

> > produce same results

> > in

> > | >| >| both situations ...

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| (1) When it is conjunct with MEP of house

> > of Placement?

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| (2) When It is far away from MEP of house

> > of Placement?

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| (3) In above example if house of placement

> > of this Planet is a

> > | >| >| mooltrikona sign will produce different

> > results, compare to non_

> > | >| >| mooltrikona sign?

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| Thanks

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >| [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >|

> > | >| >|