Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do not find themselves comfortable to produce results expected of them.However any sign from where a particular planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception to this rule and planet in such state does not find itself restricted to produce results, Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping of such signs/planets.This is will help many junior readers like me who read your books. In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets more important than Inimical planets? Thank you for attending to this basic question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Hello Mr. Sukhjez, There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter and friends amongst themselves and rest of the planets are friends amongst themselves. Malefic planet is a planet which harms when afflicting closely. Inimical planet has a relationship with another planet and both of these can be functional benefic or malefic for a particular ascendant. Best wishes, - " sukhjez " <sukhjez Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM Inimical signs > > > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs of their > enemies,they do not find themselves comfortable to produce > results expected of them.However any sign from where a particular > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception to this rule and > planet in such state does not find itself restricted to produce > results, > > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping of such > signs/planets.This is will help many junior readers like me who > read your books. > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets more important than > Inimical planets? > Thank you for attending to this basic question > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Dear Sir, When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do not find themselves comfortable to produce results expected of them. DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE RESULTS OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A WEAK PLANET ? SG. --- siha wrote: > > Hello Mr. Sukhjez, > > There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter > and friends amongst > themselves and rest of the planets are friends > amongst themselves. > > Malefic planet is a planet which harms when > afflicting closely. > Inimical planet has a relationship with another > planet and both of these can > be functional benefic or malefic for a particular > ascendant. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " sukhjez " <sukhjez > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM > Inimical signs > > > > > > > > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > > > > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs of > their > > enemies,they do not find themselves comfortable > to produce > > results expected of them.However any sign from > where a particular > > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception to > this rule and > > planet in such state does not find itself > restricted to produce > > results, > > > > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping of > such > > signs/planets.This is will help many junior > readers like me who > > read your books. > > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets more > important than > > Inimical planets? > > Thank you for attending to this basic question > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Hello SG, Not bad but less. Best wishes, - " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM Re: Inimical signs > Dear Sir, > > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do not > find themselves comfortable to produce results > expected of them. > > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE RESULTS > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A WEAK > PLANET ? > > SG. > > > --- siha wrote: > >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter >> and friends amongst >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends >> amongst themselves. >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when >> afflicting closely. >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another >> planet and both of these can >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular >> ascendant. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> - >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM >> Inimical signs >> >> >> > >> > >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 >> > >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs of >> their >> > enemies,they do not find themselves comfortable >> to produce >> > results expected of them.However any sign from >> where a particular >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception to >> this rule and >> > planet in such state does not find itself >> restricted to produce >> > results, >> > >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping of >> such >> > signs/planets.This is will help many junior >> readers like me who >> > read your books. >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets more >> important than >> > Inimical planets? >> > Thank you for attending to this basic question >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Dear Sir, If the effect is less, then in many of the case analysis appearing in the book/list why we are not considering the impact of inimical signs ..The inimical sign's importance is not discussed in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I correct ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn are in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever the (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they are functional benefics ? I mean there is a general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage may not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional ..Hence the doubt . Thanks SG. Thanks SG. --- siha wrote: > > Hello SG, > > Not bad but less. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > <sadasivan_g > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM > Re: Inimical signs > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do > not > > find themselves comfortable to produce results > > expected of them. > > > > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE > RESULTS > > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A > WEAK > > PLANET ? > > > > SG. > > > > > > --- siha wrote: > > > >> > >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, > >> > >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter > >> and friends amongst > >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends > >> amongst themselves. > >> > >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when > >> afflicting closely. > >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another > >> planet and both of these can > >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular > >> ascendant. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez > >> > >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM > >> Inimical signs > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > >> > > >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs > of > >> their > >> > enemies,they do not find themselves > comfortable > >> to produce > >> > results expected of them.However any sign > from > >> where a particular > >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception > to > >> this rule and > >> > planet in such state does not find itself > >> restricted to produce > >> > results, > >> > > >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping > of > >> such > >> > signs/planets.This is will help many > junior > >> readers like me who > >> > read your books. > >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets > more > >> important than > >> > Inimical planets? > >> > Thank you for attending to this basic > question > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Hello SG, The main thing is the functional nature of the planet. Inimical relationship of the planet with the sign is less important to the extent of being insignificant. That is why it has not been discussed in the case studies. Best wishes, - " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:53 PM Re: Inimical signs > Dear Sir, > > If the effect is less, then in many of the > case analysis appearing in the book/list why we > are not considering the impact of inimical signs > .The inimical sign's importance is not discussed > in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for > Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in > enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other > affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give > full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I correct > ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn are > in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever the > (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they > are functional benefics ? I mean there is a > general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage may > not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna > lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional > .Hence the doubt . > > Thanks > > SG. > > > > Thanks > > SG. > > --- siha wrote: > >> >> Hello SG, >> >> Not bad but less. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> - >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " >> <sadasivan_g >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM >> Re: Inimical signs >> >> >> > Dear Sir, >> > >> > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do >> not >> > find themselves comfortable to produce results >> > expected of them. >> > >> > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE >> RESULTS >> > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A >> WEAK >> > PLANET ? >> > >> > SG. >> > >> > >> > --- siha wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, >> >> >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter >> >> and friends amongst >> >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends >> >> amongst themselves. >> >> >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when >> >> afflicting closely. >> >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another >> >> planet and both of these can >> >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular >> >> ascendant. >> >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez >> >> >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM >> >> Inimical signs >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 >> >> > >> >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs >> of >> >> their >> >> > enemies,they do not find themselves >> comfortable >> >> to produce >> >> > results expected of them.However any sign >> from >> >> where a particular >> >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception >> to >> >> this rule and >> >> > planet in such state does not find itself >> >> restricted to produce >> >> > results, >> >> > >> >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping >> of >> >> such >> >> > signs/planets.This is will help many >> junior >> >> readers like me who >> >> > read your books. >> >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets >> more >> >> important than >> >> > Inimical planets? >> >> > Thank you for attending to this basic >> question >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 Dear Sir, Thanks SG. --- siha wrote: > > Hello SG, > > The main thing is the functional nature of the > planet. Inimical relationship > of the planet with the sign is less important to the > extent of being > insignificant. That is why it has not been > discussed in the case studies. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > <sadasivan_g > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:53 PM > Re: Inimical signs > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > If the effect is less, then in many of the > > case analysis appearing in the book/list why we > > are not considering the impact of inimical > signs > > .The inimical sign's importance is not > discussed > > in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for > > Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in > > enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other > > affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give > > full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I > correct > > ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn > are > > in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever > the > > (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they > > are functional benefics ? I mean there is a > > general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage > may > > not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna > > lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional > > .Hence the doubt . > > > > Thanks > > > > SG. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > SG. > > > > --- siha wrote: > > > >> > >> Hello SG, > >> > >> Not bad but less. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > >> <sadasivan_g > >> > >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM > >> Re: Inimical signs > >> > >> > >> > Dear Sir, > >> > > >> > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they > do > >> not > >> > find themselves comfortable to produce results > >> > expected of them. > >> > > >> > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE > >> RESULTS > >> > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A > >> WEAK > >> > PLANET ? > >> > > >> > SG. > >> > > >> > > >> > --- siha wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, > >> >> > >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and > Jupiter > >> >> and friends amongst > >> >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends > >> >> amongst themselves. > >> >> > >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when > >> >> afflicting closely. > >> >> Inimical planet has a relationship with > another > >> >> planet and both of these can > >> >> be functional benefic or malefic for a > particular > >> >> ascendant. > >> >> > >> >> Best wishes, > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> - > >> >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez > >> >> > >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM > >> >> Inimical signs > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > >> >> > > >> >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy > signs > >> of > >> >> their > >> >> > enemies,they do not find themselves > >> comfortable > >> >> to produce > >> >> > results expected of them.However any sign > >> from > >> >> where a particular > >> >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an > exception > >> to > >> >> this rule and > >> >> > planet in such state does not find itself > >> >> restricted to produce > >> >> > results, > >> >> > > >> >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA > grouping > >> of > >> >> such > >> >> > signs/planets.This is will help many > >> junior > >> >> readers like me who > >> >> > read your books. > >> >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets > >> more > >> >> important than > >> >> > Inimical planets? > >> >> > Thank you for attending to this basic > >> question > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 Dear Professor, There is no dispositor for non-MT signs. So the rulership for Non-MT signs are totally ignored. Likewise may I ignore the friendly and inimical signs for non-MT? The significations of the houses having mooltrikona sign of an afflicted planet are HARMED MORE when such planets are already weak for other reasons. Planets have their placement elsewhere and also owns non-MT, in this case may I consider the non-MT signs will never get disturbed? Sorry for disturbance, I asked this question to remove my confusion about non-MT signs. Classical say MT signs will predominate while the non-MT signs to a lesser extent. jayachandran , <siha wrote: > > > Hello SG, > > The main thing is the functional nature of the planet. Inimical relationship > of the planet with the sign is less important to the extent of being > insignificant. That is why it has not been discussed in the case studies. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:53 PM > Re: Inimical signs > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > If the effect is less, then in many of the > > case analysis appearing in the book/list why we > > are not considering the impact of inimical signs > > .The inimical sign's importance is not discussed > > in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for > > Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in > > enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other > > affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give > > full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I correct > > ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn are > > in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever the > > (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they > > are functional benefics ? I mean there is a > > general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage may > > not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna > > lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional > > .Hence the doubt . > > > > Thanks > > > > SG. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > SG. > > > > --- siha wrote: > > > >> > >> Hello SG, > >> > >> Not bad but less. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > >> <sadasivan_g > >> > >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM > >> Re: Inimical signs > >> > >> > >> > Dear Sir, > >> > > >> > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do > >> not > >> > find themselves comfortable to produce results > >> > expected of them. > >> > > >> > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE > >> RESULTS > >> > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A > >> WEAK > >> > PLANET ? > >> > > >> > SG. > >> > > >> > > >> > --- siha wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, > >> >> > >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter > >> >> and friends amongst > >> >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends > >> >> amongst themselves. > >> >> > >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when > >> >> afflicting closely. > >> >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another > >> >> planet and both of these can > >> >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular > >> >> ascendant. > >> >> > >> >> Best wishes, > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> - > >> >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez > >> >> > >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM > >> >> Inimical signs > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > >> >> > > >> >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs > >> of > >> >> their > >> >> > enemies,they do not find themselves > >> comfortable > >> >> to produce > >> >> > results expected of them.However any sign > >> from > >> >> where a particular > >> >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception > >> to > >> >> this rule and > >> >> > planet in such state does not find itself > >> >> restricted to produce > >> >> > results, > >> >> > > >> >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping > >> of > >> >> such > >> >> > signs/planets.This is will help many > >> junior > >> >> readers like me who > >> >> > read your books. > >> >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets > >> more > >> >> important than > >> >> > Inimical planets? > >> >> > Thank you for attending to this basic > >> question > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 , " rama_jayachandran " <rama_jayachandran wrote: > > Dear Professor, > > There is no dispositor for non-MT signs. So the rulership for Non-MT > signs are totally ignored. Likewise may I ignore the friendly and > inimical signs for non-MT? > > The significations of the houses having mooltrikona sign of an > afflicted planet are HARMED MORE when such planets are already weak > for other reasons. Planets have their placement elsewhere and also > owns non-MT, in this case may I consider the non-MT signs will never > get disturbed? > > Sorry for disturbance, I asked this question to remove my confusion > about non-MT signs. Classical say MT signs will predominate while > the non-MT signs to a lesser extent. > > jayachandran > Am I correct to say that in SA MT sign houses are weaker than Non MT houses cos MT houses are afflicted whenever their lords are afflicted by malefic planets by a close orb whereas Non MT houses are only afflicted when a malefic afflicts close to MEP of Non MT houses.In other words when a MT planet is closely afflicted, its MT house suffers ,not the Non MT HOUSE .........but in classical MT houses are stronger than Non MT houses.Compared to SA, classically a afflicted MT planet , the Non MT house suffers more than MT house. Thanks > > , <siha@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello SG, > > > > The main thing is the functional nature of the planet. Inimical > relationship > > of the planet with the sign is less important to the extent of > being > > insignificant. That is why it has not been discussed in the case > studies. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > - > > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g@> > > > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:53 PM > > Re: Inimical signs > > > > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > If the effect is less, then in many of the > > > case analysis appearing in the book/list why we > > > are not considering the impact of inimical signs > > > .The inimical sign's importance is not discussed > > > in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for > > > Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in > > > enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other > > > affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give > > > full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I correct > > > ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn are > > > in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever the > > > (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they > > > are functional benefics ? I mean there is a > > > general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage may > > > not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna > > > lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional > > > .Hence the doubt . > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > SG. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > SG. > > > > > > --- siha@ wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hello SG, > > >> > > >> Not bad but less. > > >> > > >> Best wishes, > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> - > > >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > > >> <sadasivan_g@> > > >> > > >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM > > >> Re: Inimical signs > > >> > > >> > > >> > Dear Sir, > > >> > > > >> > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do > > >> not > > >> > find themselves comfortable to produce results > > >> > expected of them. > > >> > > > >> > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE > > >> RESULTS > > >> > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A > > >> WEAK > > >> > PLANET ? > > >> > > > >> > SG. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > --- siha@ wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, > > >> >> > > >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter > > >> >> and friends amongst > > >> >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends > > >> >> amongst themselves. > > >> >> > > >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when > > >> >> afflicting closely. > > >> >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another > > >> >> planet and both of these can > > >> >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular > > >> >> ascendant. > > >> >> > > >> >> Best wishes, > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> - > > >> >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez@> > > >> >> > > >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM > > >> >> Inimical signs > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs > > >> of > > >> >> their > > >> >> > enemies,they do not find themselves > > >> comfortable > > >> >> to produce > > >> >> > results expected of them.However any sign > > >> from > > >> >> where a particular > > >> >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception > > >> to > > >> >> this rule and > > >> >> > planet in such state does not find itself > > >> >> restricted to produce > > >> >> > results, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping > > >> of > > >> >> such > > >> >> > signs/planets.This is will help many > > >> junior > > >> >> readers like me who > > >> >> > read your books. > > >> >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets > > >> more > > >> >> important than > > >> >> > Inimical planets? > > >> >> > Thank you for attending to this basic > > >> question > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 , " sukhjez " <sukhjez wrote: > > , " rama_jayachandran " > <rama_jayachandran@> wrote: > > > > Dear Professor, > > > > There is no dispositor for non-MT signs. So the rulership for Non-MT > > signs are totally ignored. Likewise may I ignore the friendly and > > inimical signs for non-MT? > > > > The significations of the houses having mooltrikona sign of an > > afflicted planet are HARMED MORE when such planets are already weak > > for other reasons. Planets have their placement elsewhere and also > > owns non-MT, in this case may I consider the non-MT signs will never > > get disturbed? > > > > Sorry for disturbance, I asked this question to remove my confusion > > about non-MT signs. Classical say MT signs will predominate while > > the non-MT signs to a lesser extent. > > > > jayachandran > > > Am I correct to say that in SA MT sign houses are weaker > than Non MT houses cos MT houses are afflicted whenever their > lords are afflicted by malefic planets by a close orb whereas > Non MT houses are only afflicted when a malefic afflicts > close to MEP of Non MT houses.In other words when a MT planet is > closely afflicted, its MT house suffers ,not the Non MT HOUSE > > ........but in classical MT houses are stronger than Non MT > houses.Compared to SA, classically a afflicted MT planet , the > Non MT house suffers more than MT house. > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , <siha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello SG, > > > > > > The main thing is the functional nature of the planet. Inimical > > relationship > > > of the planet with the sign is less important to the extent of > > being > > > insignificant. That is why it has not been discussed in the case > > studies. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g@> > > > > > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:53 PM > > > Re: Inimical signs > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > > > If the effect is less, then in many of the > > > > case analysis appearing in the book/list why we > > > > are not considering the impact of inimical signs > > > > .The inimical sign's importance is not discussed > > > > in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for > > > > Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in > > > > enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other > > > > affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give > > > > full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I correct > > > > ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn are > > > > in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever the > > > > (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they > > > > are functional benefics ? I mean there is a > > > > general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage may > > > > not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna > > > > lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional > > > > .Hence the doubt . > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > SG. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > SG. > > > > > > > > --- siha@ wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hello SG, > > > >> > > > >> Not bad but less. > > > >> > > > >> Best wishes, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> - > > > >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > > > >> <sadasivan_g@> > > > >> > > > >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM > > > >> Re: Inimical signs > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Dear Sir, > > > >> > > > > >> > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do > > > >> not > > > >> > find themselves comfortable to produce results > > > >> > expected of them. > > > >> > > > > >> > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE > > > >> RESULTS > > > >> > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A > > > >> WEAK > > > >> > PLANET ? > > > >> > > > > >> > SG. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > --- siha@ wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter > > > >> >> and friends amongst > > > >> >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends > > > >> >> amongst themselves. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when > > > >> >> afflicting closely. > > > >> >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another > > > >> >> planet and both of these can > > > >> >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular > > > >> >> ascendant. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Best wishes, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> - > > > >> >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez@> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM > > > >> >> Inimical signs > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs > > > >> of > > > >> >> their > > > >> >> > enemies,they do not find themselves > > > >> comfortable > > > >> >> to produce > > > >> >> > results expected of them.However any sign > > > >> from > > > >> >> where a particular > > > >> >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception > > > >> to > > > >> >> this rule and > > > >> >> > planet in such state does not find itself > > > >> >> restricted to produce > > > >> >> > results, > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping > > > >> of > > > >> >> such > > > >> >> > signs/planets.This is will help many > > > >> junior > > > >> >> readers like me who > > > >> >> > read your books. > > > >> >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets > > > >> more > > > >> >> important than > > > >> >> > Inimical planets? > > > >> >> > Thank you for attending to this basic > > > >> question > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2007 Report Share Posted January 21, 2007 You are right, Mr. Sukhjez, Best wishes, - " sukhjez " <sukhjez Sunday, January 21, 2007 8:48 PM Re: Inimical signs > , " sukhjez " <sukhjez wrote: >> >> , " rama_jayachandran " >> <rama_jayachandran@> wrote: >> > >> > Dear Professor, >> > >> > There is no dispositor for non-MT signs. So the rulership for Non-MT >> > signs are totally ignored. Likewise may I ignore the friendly and >> > inimical signs for non-MT? >> > >> > The significations of the houses having mooltrikona sign of an >> > afflicted planet are HARMED MORE when such planets are already weak >> > for other reasons. Planets have their placement elsewhere and also >> > owns non-MT, in this case may I consider the non-MT signs will never >> > get disturbed? >> > >> > Sorry for disturbance, I asked this question to remove my confusion >> > about non-MT signs. Classical say MT signs will predominate while >> > the non-MT signs to a lesser extent. >> > >> > jayachandran >> > >> Am I correct to say that in SA MT sign houses are weaker >> than Non MT houses cos MT houses are afflicted whenever their >> lords are afflicted by malefic planets by a close orb whereas >> Non MT houses are only afflicted when a malefic afflicts >> close to MEP of Non MT houses.In other words when a MT planet is >> closely afflicted, its MT house suffers ,not the Non MT HOUSE >> >> ........but in classical MT houses are stronger than Non MT >> houses.Compared to SA, classically a afflicted MT planet , the >> Non MT house suffers more than MT house. >> >> Thanks >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > , <siha@> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > Hello SG, >> > > >> > > The main thing is the functional nature of the planet. Inimical >> > relationship >> > > of the planet with the sign is less important to the extent of >> > being >> > > insignificant. That is why it has not been discussed in the case >> > studies. >> > > >> > > Best wishes, >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > - >> > > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g@> >> > > >> > > Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:53 PM >> > > Re: Inimical signs >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Sir, >> > > > >> > > > If the effect is less, then in many of the >> > > > case analysis appearing in the book/list why we >> > > > are not considering the impact of inimical signs >> > > > .The inimical sign's importance is not discussed >> > > > in the case studies .for eg , Mars in quaris for >> > > > Capricorn Lagna . 4th lord in 2nd house but in >> > > > enemy's sign . Assuming YOUNG Mars has no other >> > > > affliction still Mars subdasa in MEP may not give >> > > > full results as it is in enemy's sign. Am I correct >> > > > ? For Aquaris Lagna , Assuming Sun and Saturn are >> > > > in mutual aspect in 9/3 houses then will ever the >> > > > (Saturn/Sun enemy relationship apply though they >> > > > are functional benefics ? I mean there is a >> > > > general saying that for Leo lagna people marriage may >> > > > not be good as 7th lord is an enemy of Lagna >> > > > lord. But in SA, we are dealing only functional >> > > > .Hence the doubt . >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > >> > > > SG. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > >> > > > SG. >> > > > >> > > > --- siha@ wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> Hello SG, >> > > >> >> > > >> Not bad but less. >> > > >> >> > > >> Best wishes, >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> - >> > > >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " >> > > >> <sadasivan_g@> >> > > >> >> > > >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:25 PM >> > > >> Re: Inimical signs >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Dear Sir, >> > > >> > >> > > >> > When planets occupy signs of their enemies,they do >> > > >> not >> > > >> > find themselves comfortable to produce results >> > > >> > expected of them. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > DOES " NOT COMFORTABLE " MEAN THAT THE >> > > >> RESULTS >> > > >> > OF THE SUB PERIOD WILL BE BAD ? IS IT A >> > > >> WEAK >> > > >> > PLANET ? >> > > >> > >> > > >> > SG. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > --- siha@ wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Hello Mr. Sukhjez, >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> There are two groups. Sun, Moon, Mars and Jupiter >> > > >> >> and friends amongst >> > > >> >> themselves and rest of the planets are friends >> > > >> >> amongst themselves. >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Malefic planet is a planet which harms when >> > > >> >> afflicting closely. >> > > >> >> Inimical planet has a relationship with another >> > > >> >> planet and both of these can >> > > >> >> be functional benefic or malefic for a particular >> > > >> >> ascendant. >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Best wishes, >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> - >> > > >> >> " sukhjez " <sukhjez@> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:53 AM >> > > >> >> Inimical signs >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Self learning course 2004 edition pg 11 >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > IN INIMICAL SIGNS:When planets occupy signs >> > > >> of >> > > >> >> their >> > > >> >> > enemies,they do not find themselves >> > > >> comfortable >> > > >> >> to produce >> > > >> >> > results expected of them.However any sign >> > > >> from >> > > >> >> where a particular >> > > >> >> > planet aspects its own MT sign is an exception >> > > >> to >> > > >> >> this rule and >> > > >> >> > planet in such state does not find itself >> > > >> >> restricted to produce >> > > >> >> > results, >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Can PROF kindly provide me with SA grouping >> > > >> of >> > > >> >> such >> > > >> >> > signs/planets.This is will help many >> > > >> junior >> > > >> >> readers like me who >> > > >> >> > read your books. >> > > >> >> > In SA ,by what degree are Malefic planets >> > > >> more >> > > >> >> important than >> > > >> >> > Inimical planets? >> > > >> >> > Thank you for attending to this basic >> > > >> question >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.