Guest guest Posted January 14, 2007 Report Share Posted January 14, 2007 Dear Professor If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. What kind of results can I expect? Regards S.T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2007 Report Share Posted January 14, 2007 Hello ST, A planet gives the results as per the strength of its dispositor. Badly placed planet fails to protect, delays and is vulnerable to problems. Best wishes, - " S. T " <taurus.sudhir Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM Depositor > Dear Professor > > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. > What kind of results can I expect? > > Regards > S.T > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2007 Report Share Posted January 14, 2007 Dear Professor Thank you Kind regards S.T On 1/14/07, siha <siha wrote: > > > Hello ST, > > A planet gives the results as per the strength of its dispositor. Badly > placed planet fails to protect, delays and is vulnerable to problems. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > < <%40>> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM > Depositor > > > Dear Professor > > > > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. > > What kind of results can I expect? > > > > Regards > > S.T > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Dear , On page http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm out of the list of weakness in decending order, weakness due to depositor's weakness takes 9th place in the list of 10.. Does it mean weakness due to depositor's weakness is not a very serious weakness? regards On 1/14/07, siha <siha wrote: > > > Hello ST, > > A planet gives the results as per the strength of its dispositor. Badly > placed planet fails to protect, delays and is vulnerable to problems. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > < <%40>> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM > Depositor > > > Dear Professor > > > > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. > > What kind of results can I expect? > > > > Regards > > S.T > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Dear Rajeev , Even I have the same doubt . Dispositor weakness is common. Case 1 : For Aquaris Lagna, Saturn is exalted and young say . But if Venus is in 10th house and is in old age then Saturn is weak due to dispositor theory . Case 2: For Aquaruis Lagna , Satrun is debilitated and if its dispositor Mars is in Gemini in middle age without affliction Case 1 is better than Case 2 because disposiotr weakness is in the lower rung of the ladder than debilitation . SG. --- Rajeev Bharol <rajeev.bharol wrote: > Dear , > On page > http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm > out of the list of weakness in decending order, > weakness due to depositor's > weakness > takes 9th place in the list of 10.. > Does it mean weakness due to depositor's weakness is > not a very serious > weakness? > > regards > > On 1/14/07, siha > <siha wrote: > > > > > > Hello ST, > > > > A planet gives the results as per the strength of > its dispositor. Badly > > placed planet fails to protect, delays and is > vulnerable to problems. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > - > > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir > <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > > < > <%40>> > > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM > > Depositor > > > > > Dear Professor > > > > > > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly > placed. > > > What kind of results can I expect? > > > > > > Regards > > > S.T > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Hello Rajeev, The weakness of a planet due to weakness of dispositor is depended upon the strength of the dispositor. It is weak in proportion to the weakness of the dispositor. Best wishes, - " Rajeev Bharol " <rajeev.bharol Monday, January 15, 2007 9:59 AM Re: Depositor > Dear , > On page http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm > out of the list of weakness in decending order, weakness due to > depositor's > weakness > takes 9th place in the list of 10.. > Does it mean weakness due to depositor's weakness is not a very serious > weakness? > > regards > > On 1/14/07, siha <siha wrote: >> >> >> Hello ST, >> >> A planet gives the results as per the strength of its dispositor. Badly >> placed planet fails to protect, delays and is vulnerable to problems. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> - >> " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> >> < <%40>> >> Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM >> Depositor >> >> > Dear Professor >> > >> > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. >> > What kind of results can I expect? >> > >> > Regards >> > S.T >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Hello SG, I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below. Best wishes, - " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g Monday, January 15, 2007 11:04 AM Re: Depositor > Dear Rajeev , > > Even I have the same doubt . Dispositor weakness > is common. > > Case 1 : For Aquaris Lagna, Saturn is exalted and > young say . But if Venus is in 10th house and is > in old age then Saturn is weak due to dispositor > theory . RIGHT.. > > Case 2: For Aquaruis Lagna , Satrun is debilitated > and if its dispositor Mars is in Gemini in > middle age without affliction. SATURN IS WEAK DUE TO ITS OWN WEAKNESS. > > Case 1 is better than Case 2 because disposiotr > weakness is in the lower rung of the ladder > than debilitation . NO. WEAKNESS OF OLD AGE CAN BE TO THE EXTENT OF 10% TO 90%. JUST REMEMBER WEAKNESS DUE TO DISPOSITORS' WEAKNESS IS DEPENDENANT UPON THE STRENGTH OF THE DISPOSITOR. HERE RUNG OF THE LADDER BECOMES IRRELEVANT. > > SG. > --- Rajeev Bharol <rajeev.bharol wrote: > >> Dear , >> On page >> > http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm >> out of the list of weakness in decending order, >> weakness due to depositor's >> weakness >> takes 9th place in the list of 10.. >> Does it mean weakness due to depositor's weakness is >> not a very serious >> weakness? >> >> regards >> >> On 1/14/07, siha >> <siha wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hello ST, >> > >> > A planet gives the results as per the strength of >> its dispositor. Badly >> > placed planet fails to protect, delays and is >> vulnerable to problems. >> > >> > Best wishes, >> > >> > >> > >> > - >> > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir >> <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> >> > < >> <%40>> >> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM >> > Depositor >> > >> > > Dear Professor >> > > >> > > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly >> placed. >> > > What kind of results can I expect? >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > S.T >> > > >> > > >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been >> removed] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Dear Sir, From the site I understand that during the sub period of a planet all the impacts on the house reg MT will come into effect. ie if the MEP of a MT is influenced by a FB then the planet ruling MT will bless the native with good or very good results during the sub period even it is weak . ie why I asked about the influence of Venus on MEP on 4th house for Virgo Asdt and jup in 5th house keeping in mind the above principle. But you are saying that Venus also is weak due to weakness of Jupiter. I agree and every one knows that it is due to dispositor theory ..But then why the first para statement .It is understood that due to dispositor theory that the presence of Venus in MT of 4th house is not going to help as Venus is weak due to jupiters debilitation weakness . Thanks and reg SG. --- siha wrote: > > Hello SG, > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your > message appended below. > > Best wishes, > > > > > > - > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > <sadasivan_g > > Monday, January 15, 2007 11:04 AM > Re: Depositor > > > > Dear Rajeev , > > > > Even I have the same doubt . Dispositor > weakness > > is common. > > > > Case 1 : For Aquaris Lagna, Saturn is exalted > and > > young say . But if Venus is in 10th house and > is > > in old age then Saturn is weak due to > dispositor > > theory . > > RIGHT.. > > > > Case 2: For Aquaruis Lagna , Satrun is > debilitated > > and if its dispositor Mars is in Gemini in > > middle age without affliction. > > SATURN IS WEAK DUE TO ITS OWN WEAKNESS. > > > > Case 1 is better than Case 2 because > disposiotr > > weakness is in the lower rung of the ladder > > than debilitation . > > NO. WEAKNESS OF OLD AGE CAN BE TO THE EXTENT OF 10% > TO 90%. JUST REMEMBER > WEAKNESS DUE TO DISPOSITORS' WEAKNESS IS > DEPENDENANT UPON THE STRENGTH OF > THE DISPOSITOR. HERE RUNG OF THE LADDER BECOMES > IRRELEVANT. > > > > SG. > > --- Rajeev Bharol <rajeev.bharol wrote: > > > >> Dear , > >> On page > >> > > > http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm > >> out of the list of weakness in decending order, > >> weakness due to depositor's > >> weakness > >> takes 9th place in the list of 10.. > >> Does it mean weakness due to depositor's weakness > is > >> not a very serious > >> weakness? > >> > >> regards > >> > >> On 1/14/07, siha > >> <siha wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Hello ST, > >> > > >> > A planet gives the results as per the strength > of > >> its dispositor. Badly > >> > placed planet fails to protect, delays and is > >> vulnerable to problems. > >> > > >> > Best wishes, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > - > >> > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir > >> <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > >> > < > >> <%40>> > >> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM > >> > Depositor > >> > > >> > > Dear Professor > >> > > > >> > > If a strong planet is having its depositor > badly > >> placed. > >> > > What kind of results can I expect? > >> > > > >> > > Regards > >> > > S.T > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > >> removed] > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Hello SG, It is pity that you do not understand/follow what I am saying. There is priority which I have told you. Read everything in that context. Best wishes, - " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g Monday, January 15, 2007 1:32 PM Re: Depositor > Dear Sir, > >>From the site I understand that during the sub > period of a planet all the impacts on the house > reg MT will come into effect. ie if the MEP of > a MT is influenced by a FB then the planet > ruling MT will bless the native with good or > very good results during the sub period even it is > weak . > > ie why I asked about the influence of Venus > on MEP on 4th house for Virgo Asdt and jup in > 5th house keeping in mind the above principle. > But you are saying that Venus also is weak > due to weakness of Jupiter. I agree and every > one knows that it is due to dispositor theory > .But then why the first para statement .It is > understood that due to dispositor theory that > the presence of Venus in MT of 4th house is not > going to help as Venus is weak due to > jupiters debilitation weakness . > > Thanks and reg > > SG. > --- siha wrote: > >> >> Hello SG, >> >> I add my replies/comments to your questions in your >> message appended below. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " >> <sadasivan_g >> >> Monday, January 15, 2007 11:04 AM >> Re: Depositor >> >> >> > Dear Rajeev , >> > >> > Even I have the same doubt . Dispositor >> weakness >> > is common. >> > >> > Case 1 : For Aquaris Lagna, Saturn is exalted >> and >> > young say . But if Venus is in 10th house and >> is >> > in old age then Saturn is weak due to >> dispositor >> > theory . >> >> RIGHT.. >> > >> > Case 2: For Aquaruis Lagna , Satrun is >> debilitated >> > and if its dispositor Mars is in Gemini in >> > middle age without affliction. >> >> SATURN IS WEAK DUE TO ITS OWN WEAKNESS. >> > >> > Case 1 is better than Case 2 because >> disposiotr >> > weakness is in the lower rung of the ladder >> > than debilitation . >> >> NO. WEAKNESS OF OLD AGE CAN BE TO THE EXTENT OF 10% >> TO 90%. JUST REMEMBER >> WEAKNESS DUE TO DISPOSITORS' WEAKNESS IS >> DEPENDENANT UPON THE STRENGTH OF >> THE DISPOSITOR. HERE RUNG OF THE LADDER BECOMES >> IRRELEVANT. >> > >> > SG. >> > --- Rajeev Bharol <rajeev.bharol wrote: >> > >> >> Dear , >> >> On page >> >> >> > >> > http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm >> >> out of the list of weakness in decending order, >> >> weakness due to depositor's >> >> weakness >> >> takes 9th place in the list of 10.. >> >> Does it mean weakness due to depositor's weakness >> is >> >> not a very serious >> >> weakness? >> >> >> >> regards >> >> >> >> On 1/14/07, siha >> >> <siha wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Hello ST, >> >> > >> >> > A planet gives the results as per the strength >> of >> >> its dispositor. Badly >> >> > placed planet fails to protect, delays and is >> >> vulnerable to problems. >> >> > >> >> > Best wishes, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > - >> >> > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir >> >> <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> >> >> > < >> >> <%40>> >> >> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM >> >> > Depositor >> >> > >> >> > > Dear Professor >> >> > > >> >> > > If a strong planet is having its depositor >> badly >> >> placed. >> >> > > What kind of results can I expect? >> >> > > >> >> > > Regards >> >> > > S.T >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been >> >> removed] >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Dear Professor, What can we expect if the depositor is young and well placed but the planet is weak with 50% strength. Will the results be good with delay Kind Regards S.T On 1/14/07, S. T <taurus.sudhir wrote: > > Dear Professor > > If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. > What kind of results can I expect? > > Regards > S.T > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Dear Sir, It is indeed pitiable to note that you add certain colourful concepts to draw attention which are unecessary. See the latest Star Teller Page No 48 .Top section . Read my question in that context. You will understand it . SG . --- siha wrote: > > Hello SG, > > It is pity that you do not understand/follow what I > am saying. There is > priority which I have told you. Read everything in > that context. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > <sadasivan_g > > Monday, January 15, 2007 1:32 PM > Re: Depositor > > > > Dear Sir, > > > >>From the site I understand that during the > sub > > period of a planet all the impacts on the > house > > reg MT will come into effect. ie if the MEP > of > > a MT is influenced by a FB then the planet > > ruling MT will bless the native with good > or > > very good results during the sub period even it > is > > weak . > > > > ie why I asked about the influence of > Venus > > on MEP on 4th house for Virgo Asdt and jup > in > > 5th house keeping in mind the above > principle. > > But you are saying that Venus also is weak > > due to weakness of Jupiter. I agree and > every > > one knows that it is due to dispositor > theory > > .But then why the first para statement .It > is > > understood that due to dispositor theory > that > > the presence of Venus in MT of 4th house is > not > > going to help as Venus is weak due to > > jupiters debilitation weakness . > > > > Thanks and reg > > > > SG. > > --- siha wrote: > > > >> > >> Hello SG, > >> > >> I add my replies/comments to your questions in > your > >> message appended below. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " > >> <sadasivan_g > >> > >> Monday, January 15, 2007 11:04 AM > >> Re: Depositor > >> > >> > >> > Dear Rajeev , > >> > > >> > Even I have the same doubt . Dispositor > >> weakness > >> > is common. > >> > > >> > Case 1 : For Aquaris Lagna, Saturn is > exalted > >> and > >> > young say . But if Venus is in 10th house > and > >> is > >> > in old age then Saturn is weak due to > >> dispositor > >> > theory . > >> > >> RIGHT.. > >> > > >> > Case 2: For Aquaruis Lagna , Satrun is > >> debilitated > >> > and if its dispositor Mars is in Gemini > in > >> > middle age without affliction. > >> > >> SATURN IS WEAK DUE TO ITS OWN WEAKNESS. > >> > > >> > Case 1 is better than Case 2 because > >> disposiotr > >> > weakness is in the lower rung of the > ladder > >> > than debilitation . > >> > >> NO. WEAKNESS OF OLD AGE CAN BE TO THE EXTENT OF > 10% > >> TO 90%. JUST REMEMBER > >> WEAKNESS DUE TO DISPOSITORS' WEAKNESS IS > >> DEPENDENANT UPON THE STRENGTH OF > >> THE DISPOSITOR. HERE RUNG OF THE LADDER BECOMES > >> IRRELEVANT. > >> > > >> > SG. > >> > --- Rajeev Bharol <rajeev.bharol > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Dear , > >> >> On page > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm > >> >> out of the list of weakness in decending > order, > >> >> weakness due to depositor's > >> >> weakness > >> >> takes 9th place in the list of 10.. > >> >> Does it mean weakness due to depositor's > weakness > >> is > >> >> not a very serious > >> >> weakness? > >> >> > >> >> regards > >> >> > >> >> On 1/14/07, siha > >> >> <siha wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Hello ST, > >> >> > > >> >> > A planet gives the results as per the > strength > >> of > >> >> its dispositor. Badly > >> >> > placed planet fails to protect, delays and > is > >> >> vulnerable to problems. > >> >> > > >> >> > Best wishes, > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > - > >> >> > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir > >> >> <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > >> >> > < > >> >> <%40>> > >> >> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM > >> >> > Depositor > >> >> > > >> >> > > Dear Professor > >> >> > > > >> >> > > If a strong planet is having its depositor > >> badly > >> >> placed. > >> >> > > What kind of results can I expect? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Regards > >> >> > > S.T > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > >> >> removed] > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Hello Mr. SG, If you find SA as colorful concepts, then you may better spend your time on more advantageous things. Best wishes, - " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " <sadasivan_g Monday, January 15, 2007 6:16 PM Re: Depositor > Dear Sir, > > It is indeed pitiable to note that you add > certain colourful concepts to draw attention > which are unecessary. See the latest Star Teller > Page No 48 .Top section . Read my question in > that context. You will understand it . > > SG . > --- siha wrote: > >> >> Hello SG, >> >> It is pity that you do not understand/follow what I >> am saying. There is >> priority which I have told you. Read everything in >> that context. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> - >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " >> <sadasivan_g >> >> Monday, January 15, 2007 1:32 PM >> Re: Depositor >> >> >> > Dear Sir, >> > >> >>From the site I understand that during the >> sub >> > period of a planet all the impacts on the >> house >> > reg MT will come into effect. ie if the MEP >> of >> > a MT is influenced by a FB then the planet >> > ruling MT will bless the native with good >> or >> > very good results during the sub period even it >> is >> > weak . >> > >> > ie why I asked about the influence of >> Venus >> > on MEP on 4th house for Virgo Asdt and jup >> in >> > 5th house keeping in mind the above >> principle. >> > But you are saying that Venus also is weak >> > due to weakness of Jupiter. I agree and >> every >> > one knows that it is due to dispositor >> theory >> > .But then why the first para statement .It >> is >> > understood that due to dispositor theory >> that >> > the presence of Venus in MT of 4th house is >> not >> > going to help as Venus is weak due to >> > jupiters debilitation weakness . >> > >> > Thanks and reg >> > >> > SG. >> > --- siha wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Hello SG, >> >> >> >> I add my replies/comments to your questions in >> your >> >> message appended below. >> >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> " SADASIVAN GOPALAKRISHNAN " >> >> <sadasivan_g >> >> >> >> Monday, January 15, 2007 11:04 AM >> >> Re: Depositor >> >> >> >> >> >> > Dear Rajeev , >> >> > >> >> > Even I have the same doubt . Dispositor >> >> weakness >> >> > is common. >> >> > >> >> > Case 1 : For Aquaris Lagna, Saturn is >> exalted >> >> and >> >> > young say . But if Venus is in 10th house >> and >> >> is >> >> > in old age then Saturn is weak due to >> >> dispositor >> >> > theory . >> >> >> >> RIGHT.. >> >> > >> >> > Case 2: For Aquaruis Lagna , Satrun is >> >> debilitated >> >> > and if its dispositor Mars is in Gemini >> in >> >> > middle age without affliction. >> >> >> >> SATURN IS WEAK DUE TO ITS OWN WEAKNESS. >> >> > >> >> > Case 1 is better than Case 2 because >> >> disposiotr >> >> > weakness is in the lower rung of the >> ladder >> >> > than debilitation . >> >> >> >> NO. WEAKNESS OF OLD AGE CAN BE TO THE EXTENT OF >> 10% >> >> TO 90%. JUST REMEMBER >> >> WEAKNESS DUE TO DISPOSITORS' WEAKNESS IS >> >> DEPENDENANT UPON THE STRENGTH OF >> >> THE DISPOSITOR. HERE RUNG OF THE LADDER BECOMES >> >> IRRELEVANT. >> >> > >> >> > SG. >> >> > --- Rajeev Bharol <rajeev.bharol >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Dear , >> >> >> On page >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > http://www.yournetastrologer.com/timing_of_events.htm >> >> >> out of the list of weakness in decending >> order, >> >> >> weakness due to depositor's >> >> >> weakness >> >> >> takes 9th place in the list of 10.. >> >> >> Does it mean weakness due to depositor's >> weakness >> >> is >> >> >> not a very serious >> >> >> weakness? >> >> >> >> >> >> regards >> >> >> >> >> >> On 1/14/07, siha >> >> >> <siha wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hello ST, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > A planet gives the results as per the >> strength >> >> of >> >> >> its dispositor. Badly >> >> >> > placed planet fails to protect, delays and >> is >> >> >> vulnerable to problems. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Best wishes, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - >> >> >> > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir >> >> >> <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> >> >> >> > < >> >> >> <%40>> >> >> >> > Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:02 PM >> >> >> > Depositor >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > Dear Professor >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > If a strong planet is having its depositor >> >> badly >> >> >> placed. >> >> >> > > What kind of results can I expect? >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Regards >> >> >> > > S.T >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have >> been >> >> >> removed] >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Yes, Mr. ST. Best wishes, - " S. T " <taurus.sudhir Monday, January 15, 2007 5:56 PM Re: Depositor > Dear Professor, > > What can we expect if the depositor is young and well placed but the > planet > is weak with 50% strength. > Will the results be good with delay > > Kind Regards > S.T > > > On 1/14/07, S. T <taurus.sudhir wrote: >> >> Dear Professor >> >> If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. >> What kind of results can I expect? >> >> Regards >> S.T >> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2007 Report Share Posted January 16, 2007 Dear Professor, Thank you. Would the results depend on the functional nature of depositor. Kind regards S.T On 1/15/07, siha <siha wrote: > > Yes, Mr. ST. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > < <%40>> > Monday, January 15, 2007 5:56 PM > Re: Depositor > > > Dear Professor, > > > > What can we expect if the depositor is young and well placed but the > > planet > > is weak with 50% strength. > > Will the results be good with delay > > > > Kind Regards > > S.T > > > > > > On 1/14/07, S. T <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> > >> Dear Professor > >> > >> If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. > >> What kind of results can I expect? > >> > >> Regards > >> S.T > >> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2007 Report Share Posted January 16, 2007 Hello ST, No. It is based on strength. Best wishes, - " S. T " <taurus.sudhir Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:57 AM Re: Re: Depositor > Dear Professor, > > Thank you. > > Would the results depend on the functional nature of depositor. > > Kind regards > S.T > > > On 1/15/07, siha <siha wrote: >> >> Yes, Mr. ST. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> - >> " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> >> < <%40>> >> Monday, January 15, 2007 5:56 PM >> Re: Depositor >> >> > Dear Professor, >> > >> > What can we expect if the depositor is young and well placed but the >> > planet >> > is weak with 50% strength. >> > Will the results be good with delay >> > >> > Kind Regards >> > S.T >> > >> > >> > On 1/14/07, S. T <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear Professor >> >> >> >> If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. >> >> What kind of results can I expect? >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> S.T >> >> >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2007 Report Share Posted January 16, 2007 Thanks Professor. Now I understand the principle clearly. On 1/16/07, siha <siha wrote: > > > Hello ST, > > No. It is based on strength. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > < <%40>> > Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:57 AM > Re: Re: Depositor > > > Dear Professor, > > > > Thank you. > > > > Would the results depend on the functional nature of depositor. > > > > Kind regards > > S.T > > > > > > On 1/15/07, siha <siha%40yournetastrologer.com> < > siha <siha%40yournetastrologer.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Yes, Mr. ST. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> " S. T " <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com> < > taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > >> < <%40><%40gr > oups.com>> > >> Monday, January 15, 2007 5:56 PM > >> Re: Depositor > >> > >> > Dear Professor, > >> > > >> > What can we expect if the depositor is young and well placed but the > >> > planet > >> > is weak with 50% strength. > >> > Will the results be good with delay > >> > > >> > Kind Regards > >> > S.T > >> > > >> > > >> > On 1/14/07, S. T <taurus.sudhir <taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>< > taurus.sudhir%40gmail.com>> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dear Professor > >> >> > >> >> If a strong planet is having its depositor badly placed. > >> >> What kind of results can I expect? > >> >> > >> >> Regards > >> >> S.T > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.