Guest guest Posted August 9, 2006 Report Share Posted August 9, 2006 Sorry Moonfinder, I did my best at the time. Go for it! Aloha, Sally On 8/8/06, moonfinder2 <moonfinder2 wrote: > > Dear List Members: > > Sorry to chime in here unexpectedly, but as a > private-study student of SA and an outside > observer... goodness, this explanation is barely > understandable. Is it possible to slow down, not > rush so much and break down the various factors > more clearly and logically? > > If I understand the distinction correctly... > > Malefic transits over the Asc affect the MEP of the > Asc and the MEP of the houses it aspects. If Saturn, > Saturn would aspect H1, H3, H7 and H10 and cause > interference, stress or delays according to its nature > on these houses. Different malefic planets will cause > problems according to their nature. Even though the > H1 lord is not being directly aspected, look to the > strength of the Asc lord to evaluate to what extent > the affairs of H1 will be able to withstand this type of > malefic impact. Look to the strength or weakness of the > other house lords to evaluate the same thing. > > Malefic transits to the Asc lord do not have to directly > aspect the Asc in order to still affect H1 affairs anyway. > The significations of the Asc lord will also be stressed or > blocked in keeping with the nature of the transiting malefic > planet. In addition to affecting H1 affairs by aspecting its > lord, the transiting planet will affect the significations of > the house it's passing through and those houses it aspects. > If Saturn is transiting the Moon in Virgo under a Cancer > lagna, it would cause problems or delays with H1 of > personal affairs because of its aspect to H1 lord, then > affect the significations of H3 of blocked initiatives--the > house it's transiting through--and adversely affect H5 of > creative intelligence or progeny and H9 of good fortune > and spiritual pursuits. > > In both instances the affairs of H1 are affected; but > according to whether the H1 lord is aspected, or the > Asc directly aspected, different house significations will > come into play in keeping with what house that malefic > transit happens to be passing through and the houses > it aspects. > > I'm sure others will fill in anything that was inadvertently > left out in the above description. Sorry to jump in here from > out of the blue. It's just that I happen to privately value > clarity, patience and logic in trying to understand the subtle > distinctions in the practice of SA, and I feel that clearness > of language and concept are very important, particularly > for new students of this wonderful systematic approach. > > MoonFinder > > <%40>, " Sally > Spencer " <sally234 wrote: > > > > Hello JV, > > > > Transit over the lord it's general and specific significations are > hurt. If > > the ascendant, the other houses get affected as well as the lord. > All are > > factored in to the equation. I would say the ascendant one is more > > deleterious then. But if the lord affects others then that needs to > come > > into play too. And remember to factor in strength too. > > > > Aloha, > > Sally > > > > On 8/7/06, jyotishvisharada <jyotishvisharada wrote: > > > > > > Learned members, > > > > > > As we know, for delineation of any house, three factors are considered > > > important viz bhav/bhavesh/karka. > > > > > > But I have doubts on importacne of each factor. for example if a > > > malefic is transiting over ascendant; what could be results. If a > > > malefic is transiting over ascendant lord, what could be the result > > > > > > please sugges > > > regard > > > JV > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.