Guest guest Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 , <siha wrote: > > Hello Vyas, Respected Sir, Pl accept my regards for your valuable guidence from time to time Pl guide for studies on subject of astro palmistry, Somesh Duggal> > Nobody is above law including the Kavach. Kavach created during strong > planetary influences is comparatively less vulnerable to transit > afflictions. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:51 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > > > Dear Professor, > > > > Thank you. Once the affliction isn't exact, we don't bother with the > > proportional study extending to the 5 degree orb. This 5 degree orb has > > importance during transit afflictions. > > > > This may seem an odd question, but it has relevance to this discussion. > > Does > > the strength of the kavach fluctuate during transit? If it doesn't, then > > what's the need in muhurta selection for their creation to ensure that FMs > > are outside the 5 degree orb of FMs and MEPs? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vyas Munidas > > > > > > > > - > > <siha > > > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:58 AM > > Re: Re: (unknown) > > > > > >> > >> Hello Vyas, > >> > >> Once out of the orb of affliction, the principle of proportional malefic > >> influence does not work. It is the transit weakness of the planet which > >> becomes vulnerable to transit afflictions. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> www.YourNetAstrologer.com > >> www.JyotishRemedies121.com > >> A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) > >> Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > >> Mobile 98110 16333 > >> > >> > >> - > >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > >> > >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:12 AM > >> Re: Re: (unknown) > >> > >> > >>> Thanks Professor. > >>> > >>> Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. > >>> > >>> The intensity of the signification suffering for short durations, for an > >>> otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic > >>> influence > >>> is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are much > >>> less > >>> than 2:38 away. > >>> > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Vyas Munidas > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - > >>> <siha > >>> > >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM > >>> Re: Re: (unknown) > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Hello Vyas, > >>>> > >>>> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then > >>>> the > >>>> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived > >>>> durations. > >>>> > >>>> Best wishes, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> - > >>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > >>>> > >>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM > >>>> Re: Re: (unknown) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Professor, > >>>>> > >>>>> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when > >>>>> it's > >>>>> only closely afflicted? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Vyas Munidas > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>> <siha > >>>>> > >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM > >>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello Vyas, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree > >>>>>> under > >>>>>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited > >>>>>> from > >>>>>> Mr. > >>>>>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best wishes, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - > >>>>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM > >>>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Arun, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's > >>>>>>> error. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen > >>>>>>> cases > >>>>>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a > >>>>>>> malefic > >>>>>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted > >>>>>>> amount > >>>>>>> of > >>>>>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Vyas Munidas > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - > >>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM > >>>>>>> Re: (unknown) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Dear Vyas, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, > >>>>>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an > >>>>>>>> orb of 2 degrees. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) > >>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its > >>>>>>>> significations. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best Wishes, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Arun > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear Arun, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It > >>>>>>>>> certainly > >>>>>>>> is a > >>>>>>>>> fortunate chart. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less > >>>>>>>>> than > >>>>>>>>> 3 > >>>>>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the > >>>>>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but > >>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> further > >>>>>>>>> this understanding. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Vyas Munidas > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM > >>>>>>>>> Re: (unknown) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of > >>>>>>>>> > Rahu. > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > Best Wishes, > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > Arun Rao > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> > >>>>>>>>> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> Dear Professor, > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets > >>>>>>>>> >> you > >>>>>>>>> > mentioned > >>>>>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the > >>>>>>>> close 5 > >>>>>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> - > >>>>>>>>> >> <siha@> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM > >>>>>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and > >>>>>>>> Moon as > >>>>>>>>> >> > strong > >>>>>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and > >>>>>>>>> >> > Ketu > >>>>>>>>> > do not > >>>>>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well > >>>>>>>>> >> > for > >>>>>>>>> > the child > >>>>>>>>> >> > and for the family. > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > Best wishes, > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com > >>>>>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com > >>>>>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) > >>>>>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > >>>>>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > - > >>>>>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM > >>>>>>>>> >> > (unknown) > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on > >>>>>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 > >>>>>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) > >>>>>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members > >>>>>>>> horoscope, > >>>>>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and > >>>>>>>> weaknesses > >>>>>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. > >>>>>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Dear Mr Somesh Duggal, From what I have heard from reliable sources, astro-palmistry is a valid science. Like anything else in this realm (SA), proper teachers are rare. My brother-in-law, a usual non-supporter of the occult sciences, once met a palmist who accurately predicted many years ago that he was migrating within a week and would have a wife of a particular descripton and two daughters. I haven't explored enough to recommed books on the hybrid subject. If you or any of the forum's members know of something worthy, I'd love to hear. Best regards, Vyas Munidas - " someshduggal " <someshduggal Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:11 AM Astro-palmistry > , <siha wrote: >> >> Hello Vyas, > Respected Sir, > Pl accept my regards for your valuable guidence from time to time > Pl guide for studies on subject of astro palmistry, > Somesh Duggal> >> Nobody is above law including the Kavach. Kavach created during strong >> planetary influences is comparatively less vulnerable to transit >> afflictions. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> - >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:51 AM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >> > Dear Professor, >> > >> > Thank you. Once the affliction isn't exact, we don't bother with the >> > proportional study extending to the 5 degree orb. This 5 degree > orb has >> > importance during transit afflictions. >> > >> > This may seem an odd question, but it has relevance to this > discussion. >> > Does >> > the strength of the kavach fluctuate during transit? If it > doesn't, then >> > what's the need in muhurta selection for their creation to ensure > that FMs >> > are outside the 5 degree orb of FMs and MEPs? >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Vyas Munidas >> > >> > >> > >> > - >> > <siha >> > >> > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:58 AM >> > Re: Re: (unknown) >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Hello Vyas, >> >> >> >> Once out of the orb of affliction, the principle of proportional > malefic >> >> influence does not work. It is the transit weakness of the > planet which >> >> becomes vulnerable to transit afflictions. >> >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> >> www.YourNetAstrologer.com >> >> www.JyotishRemedies121.com >> >> A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >> >> Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >> >> Mobile 98110 16333 >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:12 AM >> >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks Professor. >> >>> >> >>> Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. >> >>> >> >>> The intensity of the signification suffering for short > durations, for an >> >>> otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic >> >>> influence >> >>> is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are > much >> >>> less >> >>> than 2:38 away. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> >> >>> Vyas Munidas >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> - >> >>> <siha >> >>> >> >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM >> >>> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hello Vyas, >> >>>> >> >>>> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb > then >> >>>> the >> >>>> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for > short lived >> >>>> durations. >> >>>> >> >>>> Best wishes, >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> - >> >>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >>>> >> >>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM >> >>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi Professor, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet > affected when >> >>>>> it's >> >>>>> only closely afflicted? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Vyas Munidas >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - >> >>>>> <siha >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >> >>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Hello Vyas, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two > degree >> >>>>>> under >> >>>>>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is > awaited >> >>>>>> from >> >>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will > change. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Best wishes, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> - >> >>>>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >> >>>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi Arun, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's >> >>>>>>> error. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've > seen >> >>>>>>> cases >> >>>>>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely > afflicted by a >> >>>>>>> malefic >> >>>>>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the > limted >> >>>>>>> amount >> >>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> - >> >>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >> >>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Dear Vyas, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is > minimal, >> >>>>>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we > would use an >> >>>>>>>> orb of 2 degrees. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this > case) >> >>>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >> >>>>>>>> significations. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Arun >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Dear Arun, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It >> >>>>>>>>> certainly >> >>>>>>>> is a >> >>>>>>>>> fortunate chart. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu > (less >> >>>>>>>>> than >> >>>>>>>>> 3 >> >>>>>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >> >>>>>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but >> >>>>>>>>> still >> >>>>>>>> there >> >>>>>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment > further >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> further >> >>>>>>>>> this understanding. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> - >> >>>>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >> >>>>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the > aspect of >> >>>>>>>>> > Rahu. >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > Best Wishes, >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > Arun Rao >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> >> >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Dear Professor, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four > planets >> >>>>>>>>> >> you >> >>>>>>>>> > mentioned >> >>>>>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is > within the >> >>>>>>>> close 5 >> >>>>>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Best regards, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> - >> >>>>>>>>> >> <siha@> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >> >>>>>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, > Sun and >> >>>>>>>> Moon as >> >>>>>>>>> >> > strong >> >>>>>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. > Rahu and >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Ketu >> >>>>>>>>> > do not >> >>>>>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart > augers well >> >>>>>>>>> >> > for >> >>>>>>>>> > the child >> >>>>>>>>> >> > and for the family. >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Best wishes, >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > - >> >>>>>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >> >>>>>>>>> >> > (unknown) >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family > members >> >>>>>>>> horoscope, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / > strengths and >> >>>>>>>> weaknesses >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.