Guest guest Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 Dear Esteemed , Is it ok to choose an auspicious time for a particular ascendant when either one or both nodes are badly placed, so long as they are away from the MEP and are not closely afflicting any planets? In such a case, all other planets would have to be well-placed and as strong as possible. For any other usable ascendants (<= 3 FM planets) in this hypothetical scenario, at least one of Jupiter or Saturn would have to be badly placed for a prolonged period of time to justify the use of the Asc. w/the badly placed node(s). So, does the particular Asc. with the badly placed node(s) become comparatively better than the aforementioned ones, who have at least one of Jupiter or Saturn being badly placed? My inference is in the affirmative, since the nodes don't have any particular significations to protect or promote. Many thanks for all of your help. Best Wishes, Arun Rao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 Hello Arun, There is no hard and fast rule and one has to balance the planetary position in the available planetary influenes. Now, say for example after first week of August, 2006, for about a period of 15 months there is not going to be an auspicious time which meets the standards. I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below. Best wishes, www.YourNetAstrologer.com www.JyotishRemedies121.com A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122101 (India) Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 Mobile 98110 16333 - " arunrao9 " <arunrao9 Saturday, June 10, 2006 9:46 AM Auspicious Time Selection Dear Esteemed , Is it ok to choose an auspicious time for a particular ascendant when either one or both nodes are badly placed, so long as they are away from the MEP and are not closely afflicting any planets? ONE CAN, IF THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE. In such a case, all other planets would have to be well-placed and as strong as possible. EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE IN THAT DIRECTION. For any other usable ascendants (<= 3 FM planets) in this hypothetical scenario, at least one of Jupiter or Saturn would have to be badly placed for a prolonged period of time to justify the use of the Asc. w/the badly placed node(s). So, does the particular Asc. with the badly placed node(s) become comparatively better than the aforementioned ones, who have at least one of Jupiter or Saturn being badly placed? I CAN COMMENT ON SOME GIVEN EXAMPLE. My inference is in the affirmative, since the nodes don't have any particular significations to protect or promote. THAT IS ONE ASPECT. Many thanks for all of your help. Best Wishes, Arun Rao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 Dear Esteemed , Many thanks for the detailed reply. Right, after Gemini rising on August 2, 2006, nothing else looks good for quite some time. An example of this phenomenon occurred back in November 2005. Using Libra Asc., the dates of November 8 and November 10, 2005 produce a very auspicious planetary alignment. Only the Sun is debilitated and the nodes are badly placed. Rahu's aspect on Saturn is not within 2 degrees, though it is close. Would this be deemed a permissible auspicious time in spite of the nodes being badly placed? In the above case, none of the other usable ascendants are permissible. Sincere thanks for all the help. Best Wishes, Arun Rao , <siha wrote: > > > Hello Arun, > > There is no hard and fast rule and one has to balance the planetary position > in the available planetary influenes. > > Now, say for example after first week of August, 2006, for about a period of > 15 months there is not going to be an auspicious time which meets the > standards. > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below. > > Best wishes, > > > www.YourNetAstrologer.com > www.JyotishRemedies121.com > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122101 (India) > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > Mobile 98110 16333 > > > - > " arunrao9 " <arunrao9 > > Saturday, June 10, 2006 9:46 AM > Auspicious Time Selection > > > Dear Esteemed , > > Is it ok to choose an auspicious time for a particular ascendant when > either one or both nodes are badly placed, so long as they are away > from the MEP and are not closely afflicting any planets? > ONE CAN, IF THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE. > In such a > case, all other planets would have to be well-placed and as strong as > possible. > EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE IN THAT DIRECTION. > For any other usable ascendants (<= 3 FM planets) in this hypothetical > scenario, at least one of Jupiter or Saturn would have to be badly > placed for a prolonged period of time to justify the use of the Asc. > w/the badly placed node(s). So, does the particular Asc. with the > badly placed node(s) become comparatively better than the > aforementioned ones, who have at least one of Jupiter or Saturn being > badly placed? > I CAN COMMENT ON SOME GIVEN EXAMPLE. > > My inference is in the affirmative, since the nodes don't have any > particular significations to protect or promote. > > THAT IS ONE ASPECT. > > Many thanks for all of your help. > > Best Wishes, > > Arun Rao > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 Hello Arun, If necessary and no good auspicious time in near future of 8th November, 2005, one can make use of such planetary influences. Best wishes, - " arunrao9 " <arunrao9 Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:46 AM Re: Auspicious Time Selection > Dear Esteemed , > > Many thanks for the detailed reply. Right, after Gemini rising on > August 2, 2006, nothing else looks good for quite some time. > > An example of this phenomenon occurred back in November 2005. Using > Libra Asc., the dates of November 8 and November 10, 2005 produce a > very auspicious planetary alignment. Only the Sun is debilitated and > the nodes are badly placed. Rahu's aspect on Saturn is not within 2 > degrees, though it is close. Would this be deemed a permissible > auspicious time in spite of the nodes being badly placed? > > In the above case, none of the other usable ascendants are permissible. > > Sincere thanks for all the help. > > Best Wishes, > > Arun Rao > > > , <siha wrote: >> >> >> Hello Arun, >> >> There is no hard and fast rule and one has to balance the planetary > position >> in the available planetary influenes. >> >> Now, say for example after first week of August, 2006, for about a > period of >> 15 months there is not going to be an auspicious time which meets the >> standards. >> >> I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended > below. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> www.YourNetAstrologer.com >> www.JyotishRemedies121.com >> A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122101 (India) >> Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >> Mobile 98110 16333 >> >> >> - >> " arunrao9 " <arunrao9 >> >> Saturday, June 10, 2006 9:46 AM >> Auspicious Time Selection >> >> >> Dear Esteemed , >> >> Is it ok to choose an auspicious time for a particular ascendant when >> either one or both nodes are badly placed, so long as they are away >> from the MEP and are not closely afflicting any planets? >> ONE CAN, IF THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE. >> In such a >> case, all other planets would have to be well-placed and as strong as >> possible. >> EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE IN THAT DIRECTION. >> For any other usable ascendants (<= 3 FM planets) in this hypothetical >> scenario, at least one of Jupiter or Saturn would have to be badly >> placed for a prolonged period of time to justify the use of the Asc. >> w/the badly placed node(s). So, does the particular Asc. with the >> badly placed node(s) become comparatively better than the >> aforementioned ones, who have at least one of Jupiter or Saturn being >> badly placed? >> I CAN COMMENT ON SOME GIVEN EXAMPLE. >> >> My inference is in the affirmative, since the nodes don't have any >> particular significations to protect or promote. >> >> THAT IS ONE ASPECT. >> >> Many thanks for all of your help. >> >> Best Wishes, >> >> Arun Rao >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 Dear Esteemed , Right, it is a good time, but obviously not as optimal as possible since the nodes are badly placed. If one were to use this ascendant for childbirth especially, he or she would have to be very careful to select a time after the nodes are more than 5 degrees away from the MEP. If by chance the nodes are within 2 degrees of the MEP, the chart becomes seriously afflicted. Badly placed nodes near the MEP are especially severe, and can be seen in the charts of those suffering from incurable ailments. Even with proper care, a caesarian operation could get delayed past an appropriate time window. So it remains a somewhat dicey scenario. I guess this is why utmost care must be taken while choosing auspicious times. As you have written, many many possibilities should be exhausted before arriving at the proper choice. Thank you for your help and best wishes always, Arun Rao , <siha wrote: > > > Hello Arun, > > If necessary and no good auspicious time in near future of 8th November, > 2005, one can make use of such planetary influences. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " arunrao9 " <arunrao9 > > Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:46 AM > Re: Auspicious Time Selection > > > > Dear Esteemed , > > > > Many thanks for the detailed reply. Right, after Gemini rising on > > August 2, 2006, nothing else looks good for quite some time. > > > > An example of this phenomenon occurred back in November 2005. Using > > Libra Asc., the dates of November 8 and November 10, 2005 produce a > > very auspicious planetary alignment. Only the Sun is debilitated and > > the nodes are badly placed. Rahu's aspect on Saturn is not within 2 > > degrees, though it is close. Would this be deemed a permissible > > auspicious time in spite of the nodes being badly placed? > > > > In the above case, none of the other usable ascendants are permissible. > > > > Sincere thanks for all the help. > > > > Best Wishes, > > > > Arun Rao > > > > > > , <siha@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hello Arun, > >> > >> There is no hard and fast rule and one has to balance the planetary > > position > >> in the available planetary influenes. > >> > >> Now, say for example after first week of August, 2006, for about a > > period of > >> 15 months there is not going to be an auspicious time which meets the > >> standards. > >> > >> I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended > > below. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> www.YourNetAstrologer.com > >> www.JyotishRemedies121.com > >> A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122101 (India) > >> Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > >> Mobile 98110 16333 > >> > >> > >> - > >> " arunrao9 " <arunrao9@> > >> > >> Saturday, June 10, 2006 9:46 AM > >> Auspicious Time Selection > >> > >> > >> Dear Esteemed , > >> > >> Is it ok to choose an auspicious time for a particular ascendant when > >> either one or both nodes are badly placed, so long as they are away > >> from the MEP and are not closely afflicting any planets? > >> ONE CAN, IF THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE. > >> In such a > >> case, all other planets would have to be well-placed and as strong as > >> possible. > >> EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE IN THAT DIRECTION. > >> For any other usable ascendants (<= 3 FM planets) in this hypothetical > >> scenario, at least one of Jupiter or Saturn would have to be badly > >> placed for a prolonged period of time to justify the use of the Asc. > >> w/the badly placed node(s). So, does the particular Asc. with the > >> badly placed node(s) become comparatively better than the > >> aforementioned ones, who have at least one of Jupiter or Saturn being > >> badly placed? > >> I CAN COMMENT ON SOME GIVEN EXAMPLE. > >> > >> My inference is in the affirmative, since the nodes don't have any > >> particular significations to protect or promote. > >> > >> THAT IS ONE ASPECT. > >> > >> Many thanks for all of your help. > >> > >> Best Wishes, > >> > >> Arun Rao > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.