Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 hello professor sir on one side we say that the weak fms cause more trouble than the strong well placed fm s than why the strengthening of weak fm is not indicated ..normally lord of the ascendant is told to be strengthened always if lord of asc is fm say mars for sco . Its not advisable to strengthen but all the literature i have seen regardin gems say the coral is best for sco . Pl explain thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 Hello Dr. Arya, You must first learn fundamentals before raising trivial questions. In SA a planet is considered the lord of a house only if there is an MT sign in that house. A functional malefic Mars being lord of sixth house is not considered the lord of the ascendant. Best wishes, - " Dr. Sumit Arya " <sumit_kits Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:10 PM contradiction about strength of fms. > hello professor > sir on one side we say > that the weak fms cause > more trouble than the > strong well placed fm s > than why the > strengthening of weak fm > is not indicated ..normally > lord of the ascendant is > told to be strengthened > always if lord of asc is fm > say mars for sco . Its not > advisable to strengthen > but all the literature i > have seen regardin gems > say the coral is best for > sco . Pl explain > thanks > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 , <siha wrote: > sorry to upset you professor didnt mean to upset you at all but according to all the literature about gems i have seen the coral is indicated for scorpio ascendant (as its ruler {not Lord} is Mars ) but the other main question still remain unanswered. one side we say > > that the weak fms cause > > more trouble than the > > strong well placed fm s > > than why the > > strengthening of weak fm > > is not indicated its not to contradict you or trying to be smart its just an confusion i thought you might help and learning is never ending thing and forums ,i thought are for sincere doubts pls if you can help regards Hello Dr. Arya, > > You must first learn fundamentals before raising trivial questions. In SA a > planet is considered the lord of a house only if there is an MT sign in that > house. > > A functional malefic Mars being lord of sixth house is not considered the > lord of the ascendant. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " Dr. Sumit Arya " <sumit_kits > > Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:10 PM > contradiction about strength of fms. > > > > hello professor > > sir on one side we say > > that the weak fms cause > > more trouble than the > > strong well placed fm s > > than why the > > strengthening of weak fm > > is not indicated ..normally > > lord of the ascendant is > > told to be strengthened > > always if lord of asc is fm > > say mars for sco . Its not > > advisable to strengthen > > but all the literature i > > have seen regardin gems > > say the coral is best for > > sco . Pl explain > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 Hello Dr. Arya, There is a difference between Systems'Approach and other literature. This forum is only for SA discussion. Best wishes, - " Dr. Sumit Arya " <sumit_kits Tuesday, March 28, 2006 1:30 PM Re: contradiction about strength of fms. > , <siha wrote: >> > sorry to upset you professor > > didnt mean to upset you at all > > but according to all the literature about gems i have seen the coral > is indicated for scorpio ascendant (as its ruler {not Lord} is Mars ) > but the other main question still remain unanswered. > > > one side we say >> > that the weak fms cause >> > more trouble than the >> > strong well placed fm s >> > than why the >> > strengthening of weak fm >> > is not indicated > > > its not to contradict you or trying to be smart its just an confusion > i thought you might help and learning is never ending thing and > forums ,i thought are for sincere doubts > > pls if you can help > > regards > > > > > Hello Dr. Arya, >> >> You must first learn fundamentals before raising trivial > questions. In SA a >> planet is considered the lord of a house only if there is an MT > sign in that >> house. >> >> A functional malefic Mars being lord of sixth house is not > considered the >> lord of the ascendant. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> - >> " Dr. Sumit Arya " <sumit_kits >> >> Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:10 PM >> contradiction about strength of fms. >> >> >> > hello professor >> > sir on one side we say >> > that the weak fms cause >> > more trouble than the >> > strong well placed fm s >> > than why the >> > strengthening of weak fm >> > is not indicated ..normally >> > lord of the ascendant is >> > told to be strengthened >> > always if lord of asc is fm >> > say mars for sco . Its not >> > advisable to strengthen >> > but all the literature i >> > have seen regardin gems >> > say the coral is best for >> > sco . Pl explain >> > thanks >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.