Confusion Regarding Significations

[Guest guest]

Hello dear Jorge and list members,

 

The following order can be followed for identifying the significations of

wealth:

 

1.Wealth: 2nd House, (If the second house does not contain a moolatrikona

sign then the wealth is ruled by the fourth house; if the fourth house does

not contain a moolatrikona sign then the wealth is ruled by the ninth house;

and if the ninth house, too, does not contain a moolatrikona sign then the

wealth is ruled by the lord of the ascendant. From the signs Aries to Pisces

the planets, the Moon, the Sun, the Moon, the Sun, Mercury, Venus, Venus,

Jupiter, the Sun, Saturn, Venus and Mars become the prime indicators of

wealth in seriatim. )

 

2. Wealth givers - 11th House, 5th House, Moon and Jupiter;

 

3. Accumulated Wealth - Venus.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

www.YourNetAstrologer.com

www.JyotishRemedies121.com

A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122101 (India)

Phones: 91 124 - 2219240

Mobile 98110 16333

 

 

-

" Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino

<siha

Sunday, March 12, 2006 6:37 PM

FW: Confusion Regarding Significations

 

 

My dear Professor,

 

The question is regarding which order should be followed.

 

Best wishes,

 

Jorge

 

 

On Behalf

Of siha

domingo, 12 de Março de 2006 12:07

 

Re: Confusion Regarding Significations

 

 

Hello Mr. Rao,

 

2nd is the prime house of wealth. The houses mentioned on page theory/t03

are alternate houses to 2H, if the 2H does not contain a mooltrikona sign.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

 

 

-

" arunrao9 " <arunrao9

 

Sunday, March 12, 2006 4:38 PM

Confusion Regarding Significations

 

 

> Dear Esteemed ,

>

> Under the page entitled " Order of Significations "

> (http://www.yournetastrologer.com/basic/signi.htm), the order of

> examining wealth is listed as the MT-rulers of the 2nd, 11th, 5th,

> Moon and Jupiter. However, on another page

> (http://www.yournetastrologer.com/theory/t03.htm), it is listed in the

> order of the 2nd, 4th, 9th, 1st, Venus and Jupiter. Which of the two

> orders should one use to ascertain the primary significator of wealth?

> Thank you.

>

> Best Wishes,

>

> Arun Rao

>